mempool: Optimize orphan map limiting. #1117
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR contains the following upstream commits:
This optimizes the way in which the mempool oprhan map is limited in the
same way the server block manager maps were previously optimized.
Previously the code would read a cryptographically random value large
enough to construct a hash, find the first entry larger than that value,
and evict it.
That approach is quite inefficient and could easily become a
bottleneck when processing transactions due to the need to read from a
source such as /dev/urandom and all of the subsequent hash comparisons.
Luckily, strong cryptographic randomness is not needed here. The primary
intent of limiting the maps is to control memory usage with a secondary
concern of making it difficult for adversaries to force eviction of
specific entries.
Consequently, this changes the code to make use of the pseudorandom
iteration order of Go's maps along with the preimage resistance of the
hashing function to provide the desired functionality. It has
previously been discussed that the specific pseudorandom iteration order
is not guaranteed by the Go spec even though in practice that is how it
is implemented. This is not a concern however because even if the
specific compiler doesn't implement that, the preimage resistance of the
hashing function alone is enough.
The following is a before and after comparison of the function for both
speed and memory allocations: