Hide quality score for specific harvest backends #362
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks. |
It depends whether the means of action are on our side or on the side of the harvested platforms I think. Probably a few months. |
|
Allright I think we need to say somehow that we are working on improving this. Maybe just add "We are working on the issue". |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a proposal to start harvesting some plateforms (ex with opendatateam/udata#2957) without penalizing them due to harvest issues.
Indeed, if quality errors shows prominently, some producers won't want to be harvested.
We could remove this when we're sure the quality issues are no more the consequences of the harvest mapping.
It would show like this on a Dataset page:
Detailed items are still available in the toggle, but not warning shown directly.
On the Dataset card, the quality metadata would simply not be shown.
What do you think @agarrone?