-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 509
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RFC: Migration to R 4.0 #629
Comments
Issue can be closed since the deadline for commenting on the blog post has passed. |
Ultimately, it's up to the maintainers of this repo. My instinct would be to close this issue once the lesson itself is compliant with R 4.0. |
The issue is about a "request for comment (RFC)" on a blog post that was released in July, not about compatibility with R >4.0. Regarding the latter, there are a handful of more or less general issues to keep track of it (see for example #608, #609). |
I agree the other issues are tracked elsewhere |
During the June Maintainer meeting, we asked for comments and experiences with the migration to R 4.0 so that we could create guidance for maintainers and instructors. We have drafted a short blog post (carpentries/carpentries.org#830) to be released next week (2020-08-03) that describes our recommendations for migration. You can find a preview of the blog post here. Please look over the blog posts and make comments by 2020-07-30 so that we can incoroporate any changes before the post goes live.
To help identify the differences between R 3.6 and R 4.0, I have run this lesson in both versions and posted the results that show the differences in output chunks and entire markdown files.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: