Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update doc for databricks_model_serving to include new fields #2579

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 14, 2023

Conversation

alexott
Copy link
Contributor

@alexott alexott commented Aug 14, 2023

Changes

Tests

  • make test run locally
  • relevant change in docs/ folder
  • covered with integration tests in internal/acceptance
  • relevant acceptance tests are passing
  • using Go SDK

@alexott alexott requested review from a team as code owners August 14, 2023 07:04
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #2579 (90a4d89) into master (84696ff) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2579   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.09%   88.09%           
=======================================
  Files         145      145           
  Lines       12108    12108           
=======================================
  Hits        10667    10667           
  Misses        944      944           
  Partials      497      497           

Copy link
Contributor

@mgyucht mgyucht left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mgyucht mgyucht added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 14, 2023
Merged via the queue into master with commit 8eba8cb Aug 14, 2023
@tanmay-db tanmay-db mentioned this pull request Aug 25, 2023
5 tasks
@nkvuong nkvuong deleted the model-serving-new-fields-doc branch February 23, 2024 10:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants