Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate databricks_cluster_policy data source to Go SDK #2155

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 24, 2023

Conversation

nkvuong
Copy link
Contributor

@nkvuong nkvuong commented Mar 24, 2023

No description provided.

@nfx nfx enabled auto-merge (squash) March 24, 2023 12:11
@nkvuong nkvuong force-pushed the sdk/data-cluster-policy branch from 296ce4e to 8ad3599 Compare March 24, 2023 12:11
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #2155 (296ce4e) into master (4b52883) will decrease coverage by 0.05%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Current head 296ce4e differs from pull request most recent head 8ad3599. Consider uploading reports for the commit 8ad3599 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2155      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.03%   88.99%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         137      137              
  Lines       11196    11181      -15     
==========================================
- Hits         9968     9950      -18     
- Misses        823      827       +4     
+ Partials      405      404       -1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
policies/data_cluster_policy.go 100.00% <100.00%> (+6.66%) ⬆️
sql/resource_sql_global_config.go 85.71% <100.00%> (+0.52%) ⬆️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

@nfx nfx disabled auto-merge March 24, 2023 13:38
@nfx nfx merged commit 9671881 into master Mar 24, 2023
@nfx nfx deleted the sdk/data-cluster-policy branch March 24, 2023 13:39
@nfx nfx mentioned this pull request Mar 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants