Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

chore: Translations 2024-12 #6460

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 10, 2024
Merged

chore: Translations 2024-12 #6460

merged 5 commits into from
Dec 10, 2024

Conversation

UdjinM6
Copy link

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 commented Dec 7, 2024

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

What was done?

How Has This Been Tested?

Breaking Changes

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone (for repository code-owners and collaborators only)

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 added this to the 22 milestone Dec 7, 2024
@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 changed the title chore: Translations 2024-11 chore: Translations 2024-12 Dec 7, 2024
@knst
Copy link
Collaborator

knst commented Dec 7, 2024

no updates for Spanish language? maybe there's a bug of data collection or task creation?
I thought we have (had?) big market share in Venezuela, so, translation to Spanish I'd consider as important

@UdjinM6
Copy link
Author

UdjinM6 commented Dec 7, 2024

It dropped below 80% but that's not a big deal really because most common strings are translated already and we can always update translations even in some minor versions later.

knst
knst approved these changes Dec 7, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@knst knst left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK 1d36a40

Russian looks good overall

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta mentioned this pull request Dec 7, 2024
Open
42 tasks
@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta merged commit bf22090 into dashpay:develop Dec 10, 2024
20 checks passed
PastaPastaPasta added a commit to PastaPastaPasta/dash that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2024
@PastaPastaPasta
Merge dashpay#6460: chore: Translations 2024-12
9a8b685 
1d36a40 80%+: it, pl, th, zh_CN (UdjinM6)
adfdb59 90%+: fr (UdjinM6)
bfff3c9 100%: ru (UdjinM6)
ed5f02d en (UdjinM6)
d373f85 dashstrings.cpp (UdjinM6)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented

  ## What was done?

  ## How Has This Been Tested?

  ## Breaking Changes

  ## Checklist:
  - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

ACKs for top commit:
  knst:
    utACK 1d36a40

Tree-SHA512: 5d860d2d78e354eeae2157e5d40e8ff659963a258b9eb216d15ec72c1c589e254c2f246173be9e3d1892f9c18acae6cfecc1f18956460be5ff13c5c84d6d0ba6
PastaPastaPasta added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2024
@PastaPastaPasta
Merge #6476: [v22.0.x] backport: final backports for v22.0.0
b602413 
c90339e Merge #6459: docs: add release notes for v22.0.0 (pasta)
a6f1fc5 Merge #6475: chore: bumped chain assumed sizes based on latest usage (pasta)
d7cd9f1 Merge #6464: chore: update man pages for v22 (pasta)
212f91c Merge #6461: docs: update supported versions in SECURITY.md (pasta)
9a8b685 Merge #6460: chore: Translations 2024-12 (pasta)
2f71f4d Merge #6458: chore: bump MIN_MASTERNODE_PROTO_VERSION to latest proto (pasta)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  Batch of backports going into v22.0.x recently merged into develop

  ## What was done?
  See commits

  ## How Has This Been Tested?
  compiles

  ## Breaking Changes
  see release notes

  ## Checklist:
    _Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
  - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

ACKs for top commit:
  kwvg:
    utACK c90339e
  UdjinM6:
    utACK c90339e

Tree-SHA512: 124643d4b17f126c56225269d291672adf567848f440cd33f53358b3f76f0e5cf801c618493e1e24162e00c525a5d43f1bfa461e8928e04e046b37a94d13ae1c
PastaPastaPasta added a commit to PastaPastaPasta/dash that referenced this pull request Dec 14, 2024
@PastaPastaPasta
Merge dashpay#6484: chore: Merge master 22.0.0 back into develop
779e429 
1c7bfcb chore: set release true (pasta)
c90339e Merge dashpay#6459: docs: add release notes for v22.0.0 (pasta)
a6f1fc5 Merge dashpay#6475: chore: bumped chain assumed sizes based on latest usage (pasta)
d7cd9f1 Merge dashpay#6464: chore: update man pages for v22 (pasta)
212f91c Merge dashpay#6461: docs: update supported versions in SECURITY.md (pasta)
9a8b685 Merge dashpay#6460: chore: Translations 2024-12 (pasta)
2f71f4d Merge dashpay#6458: chore: bump MIN_MASTERNODE_PROTO_VERSION to latest proto (pasta)
fa29ed5 Merge dashpay#6456: fix(qt): allow refreshing wallet data without crashing (pasta)
758cd64 Merge dashpay#6452: fix: store ready queues on the mixing masternode (pasta)
395447b Merge dashpay#6451: depends: update 'src/dashbls' to dashpay/bls-signatures@7e747e8a as 62fa665 (pasta)
c7b0d80 Merge dashpay#6441: fix: hold wallet shared pointer in CJ Manager/Sessions to prevent concurrent unload (pasta)
c074e09 Merge dashpay#6444: fix: add platform transfer to "most common" filter (pasta)
cb04114 Merge dashpay#6442: fix: coin selection with `include_unsafe` option should respect `nCoinType` (pasta)
db5b53a Merge dashpay#6434: fix: early EHF and buried EHF are indistinguish (pasta)
8b88ff7 Merge dashpay#6414: chore: bump seeds for v22 (pasta)
02ad523 Merge dashpay#6411: chore: update nMinimumChainWork, defaultAssumeValid, checkpointData, chainTxData for mainnet and testnet (pasta)
3bbcd3d Merge dashpay#6393: docs: mention building for some HOSTs only in `release-process.md` (pasta)
18f636f Merge dashpay#6426: fix: respect SENDDSQUEUE message, move DSQ relay into net processing / peerman (pasta)
9fed456 Merge dashpay#6407: fix: dataraces (pasta)
86105da Merge dashpay#6408: refactor: removed pre-MN_RR logic of validation of CL (pasta)
a1f7e96 Merge dashpay#6406: ci: use `actions/cache` to manage depends cache (pasta)
90a3807 Merge dashpay#6402: ci: cache built (pasta)
66f6787 Merge dashpay#6401: ci: deduplicate depends building (pasta)
7ca5663 Merge dashpay#6397: ci: add powerpc64 to GH Guix job matrix (pasta)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented

  ## What was done?
  Suppressed changes from 1c7bfcb and resolved merge conflicts.

  ```
  Auto-merging .github/workflows/build.yml
  Auto-merging configure.ac
  Auto-merging src/chainparams.cpp
  Auto-merging src/coinjoin/client.cpp
  CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/coinjoin/client.cpp
  Auto-merging src/coinjoin/client.h
  CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/coinjoin/client.h
  Auto-merging src/coinjoin/util.cpp
  CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/coinjoin/util.cpp
  Auto-merging src/coinjoin/util.h
  CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/coinjoin/util.h
  Auto-merging src/evo/specialtxman.cpp
  Auto-merging src/init.cpp
  Auto-merging src/net_processing.cpp
  CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/net_processing.cpp
  Auto-merging src/net_processing.h
  Auto-merging src/qt/transactiontablemodel.cpp
  Auto-merging src/wallet/wallet.cpp
  Auto-merging src/wallet/wallet.h
  CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/wallet/wallet.h
  Auto-merging test/functional/feature_llmq_chainlocks.py
  CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in test/functional/feature_llmq_chainlocks.py
  ```

  ## How Has This Been Tested?

  ## Breaking Changes

  ## Checklist:
  - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

ACKs for top commit:
  PastaPastaPasta:
    utACK d108579; no diff to develop

Tree-SHA512: 3f063011224880fee35edb04ce265dff33a52273c3d45ef1dbcebcecb22c25d8ad7c91b83514f36142716a6fbd0ddd3a8a3f2a9b59ce78ce975bbce69a2a13b5
@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 mentioned this pull request Dec 18, 2024
Merged
5 tasks
PastaPastaPasta added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2025
@PastaPastaPasta
Merge #6495: chore: Translations 2024-12 (more lang updates only)
24a0fdd 
d0fe1b5 80%+: pl (UdjinM6)
d3527cc 100%: fr, it, zh_CN, zh_TW (UdjinM6)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  No changes in `en`/`dashstrings.cpp` this time, just a follow-up to #6460 with recent updates from transifex

  ## What was done?

  ## How Has This Been Tested?

  ## Breaking Changes

  ## Checklist:
  - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

ACKs for top commit:
  PastaPastaPasta:
    utACK d0fe1b5

Tree-SHA512: 2671cbede0f73ea2fd62b5682df49e6f48aa471160fe716b079088d1ed5fb0cf330fc7ea8dbb229f97296e83750551829f621f458cb322c988d15f1ee71477af
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@knst knst knst approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
22
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@UdjinM6 @knst @PastaPastaPasta