-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 304
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DAOS-16037 pool: Fix upgrade for svc_ops #14753
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The change to this function seems good. No change requested since this form seems cleaner.
Just for confirmation, if the changes to this function were omitted from this patch, the issues in the ticket resulting from the pool upgrade bug would be resolved via the other change in this patch to pool_upgrade_props()? i.e., For a daos 2.4 pool whose svc_ops_{enabled,age,max} all do not exist, functionally with or without the change to this function, in both cases itt will result in the same svc->ps_ops_enabled = 0, svc->svc_ops_max = 0, svc->svc_ops_age = 0 ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@kccain, yes, I think things should work without the changes in
read_db_for_stepping_up
. Do you prefer not to make these changes?This question reminds me: To make the code easier to understand, I should have written an
else
branch that setsenabled
,max
, andage
to 0. What do you think?(Since the CI job has already failed during
git fetch
, I'll refresh the PR to add theelse
branch. But please feel free to share any concern/objection.)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No objection, I think your change is an improvement, including the most recent change to add the else branch and improve code readability.