-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 304
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DAOS-16052 test: Skip wal tests if fault injection feature is disabled #14600
Conversation
Ticket title is 'UTEST_VOS_md_on_ssd tests failing in 2.6 rc1 tag PR' |
some tests required fault injection, skip these tests if this feature is not enabled. Skip-func-hw-test: true Required-githooks: true Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <shilong.wang@intel.com>
54ae391
to
308635f
Compare
I've kicked off https://build.hpdd.intel.com/job/daos-stack/job/daos/job/PR-14600/3/ with |
Test stage NLT on EL 8.8 completed with status UNSTABLE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com/job/daos-stack/job/daos//view/change-requests/job/PR-14600/3/testReport/ |
Skip-func-test: true Required-githooks: true Signed-off-by: Phil Henderson <phillip.henderson@intel.com>
cef3b2f
https://build.hpdd.intel.com/job/daos-stack/job/daos/job/PR-14600/4/ (includes Valgrind suppression; BUILD_TYPE=dev) did not report any failures but NLT timed out and aborted the build. I've started https://build.hpdd.intel.com/job/daos-stack/job/daos/job/PR-14600/5/ (includes Valgrind suppression; BUILD_TYPE=rebuild) |
Build https://build.hpdd.intel.com/job/daos-stack/job/daos/job/PR-14600/5/ passed w/ |
#14600) (#14605) Some tests required fault injection, skip these tests if this feature is not enabled. Adding Valgrind suppressions. Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <shilong.wang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Phil Henderson <phillip.henderson@intel.com> Co-authored-by: Phil Henderson <phillip.henderson@intel.com>
some tests required fault injection, skip these tests if this feature is not enabled.
Required-githooks: true
Before requesting gatekeeper:
Features:
(orTest-tag*
) commit pragma was used or there is a reason documented that there are no appropriate tags for this PR.Gatekeeper: