-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 163
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Proposal: Deprecate POP3 support if no one steps up to maintain it #452
Comments
I agree. If we end up removing it I might archive in its own repo with the hope someone someday wants to revisit :) |
I removed POP3 issues from blockers to release 1.2: |
There might, for some VERY strange reason, Mx providers that will not allow IMAP but only POP3 ... Even though they'd deserve a good slap! Are you seeking to remove the support for POP3 completely to get it out of the current repo? If so, would it make sense to build a new repo that supplies a module that would enable POP3 again - but can be supported without touching the main repo? Just my 2 cents. K |
Mostly, I want to align expectations with reality. If we don't expect to have brainpower to maintain a feature, we should remove it, or tag it as experimental (help wanted). |
I agree. I don't think we must call it "experimental" because in my perspectice it seems like it is a kind of early stage feature that WILL be updated. I recommend to just call it deprecated for a future release and just give it a deprecation deadline. I know some people still use POP3 but honestly, it is an outdated old protocol that most people will avoid. |
+1 for "deprecated" |
+1 for getting rid of POP3 support entirely. Away with the cruft for developers to be able to concentrate on more important stuff. |
RFC 9899 IMAP v POP |
So upcoming Cypht 1.5 will no longer have POP support. |
We have multiple issues with POP3:
https://github.com/jasonmunro/cypht/labels/pop3
Clearly, it's not working very well.
Our energy should be on the present and the future, not the past. We should focus on making IMAP rock stable. I see no reason to use POP3. Please someone explain to me the use case.
And then, get JMAP rock stable:
#180
And then, with any remaining energy, support EWS:
#247
Now, I know there are some POP3 users and fans. This is your time to step up and say "I will help". We need coders. If you can't code, we need someone to lead a fundraising campaign so we can hire coders.
I propose to give community members 2 months to come up with a plan. In the absence of one, we mark POP3 issues / code / etc. as deprecated. And in the issues, we indicate that we are looking for help. If no one steps up by 2021-12-31, we remove all POP3 related code from Cypht.
Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: