Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add-on should depend on Spring Security 5.5 #146

Closed
gorbunkov opened this issue Feb 27, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed

Add-on should depend on Spring Security 5.5 #146

gorbunkov opened this issue Feb 27, 2023 · 4 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@gorbunkov
Copy link
Contributor

gorbunkov commented Feb 27, 2023

In CUBA issue cuba-platform/cuba#3282 Spring Security dependency has been upgraded to version 5.5. REST API add-on takes Spring Security version from CUBA BOM file. In order to actually update Spring Security dependency in REST API we need to build the new add-on release.

This should also fix SAML add-on issue cuba-platform/saml-addon#30, because that issue is only relevant to specific Spring Security 5.2 versions. After REST API add-on depends on Spring Security 5.5, the SAML issue should disappear.

@gorbunkov gorbunkov self-assigned this Feb 27, 2023
@gorbunkov gorbunkov added this to the Release 7.2 milestone Feb 27, 2023
@gorbunkov
Copy link
Contributor Author

For QA: please do a smoke-testing of the restapi add-on

@igisho
Copy link

igisho commented May 3, 2023

After update /app/dispatch/ endpoint startet to fail https://doc.cuba-platform.com/manual-latest/dispatcher-spring.xml.html

@gorbunkov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@igisho I've just tried to create a new project with CUBA 7.2.20 and REST 7.2.6 - dispatcher controllers seem to work fine.

Please create a separate issue with steps describing how to reproduce the problem.

@igisho
Copy link

igisho commented May 12, 2023

@gorbunkov done: cuba-platform/cuba#3298

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants