Fix CALIB_SCALE key in analysis.yaml

[HealthyPear]

Fix a typo in the example config file of the analysis which would disable CALIB_SCALE if not fixed by the user

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #153 (4f73af1) into master (bc24635) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #153   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   66.93%   66.93%           
=======================================
  Files          23       23           
  Lines        2238     2238           
=======================================
  Hits         1498     1498           
  Misses        740      740           

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update bc24635...4f73af1. Read the comment docs.

[kosack]

this reminds me that if we use yaml config files, we should use a schema to validate them. But if all this will use ctapipe's config system in the future, there is no problem (it already does validation)

[HealthyPear]

this reminds me that if we use yaml config files, we should use a schema to validate them. But if all this will use ctapipe's config system in the future, there is no problem (it already does validation)

sure, no need to make it fancier here (aside from these bugs which are anyway rare now...)

We just need to make sure that all the small important options that I add in protopipe from the CTAMARS comparison will be available from ctapipe-process