Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ELMFunctionalVisitor #1300

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 5, 2023
Merged

ELMFunctionalVisitor #1300

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 5, 2023

Conversation

JPercival
Copy link
Contributor

  • Adds a new ElmFunctionalVisitor class and tests for same.
  • This class is intended to be used in cases where a simple function definition can determine the visitor behavior. Potential use cases include
    • Unit tests
    • Simple ELM edits
    • Implementing compiler warnings

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 5, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (ddc078b) 61.53% compared to head (40d7dbf) 61.53%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #1300      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     61.53%   61.53%   -0.01%     
+ Complexity     6149     6148       -1     
============================================
  Files           468      468              
  Lines         23591    23591              
  Branches       4565     4565              
============================================
- Hits          14517    14516       -1     
- Misses         6965     6966       +1     
  Partials       2109     2109              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@JPercival JPercival merged commit d05cc60 into master Dec 5, 2023
3 checks passed
@JPercival JPercival deleted the feature-elm-functional-visitor branch December 5, 2023 18:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants