Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

QI-Core STU 6 Model Info SimpleObservation.value #1461

Closed
JSRankins opened this issue Dec 4, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

QI-Core STU 6 Model Info SimpleObservation.value #1461

JSRankins opened this issue Dec 4, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
@brynrhodes
Labels
bug md impact tracking The issue is impacting measure development
Milestone
Maintenance

Comments

@JSRankins
Copy link
Contributor

Good morning. Working through some QI-Core STU 6 logic updates, and an issue was encountered with SimpleObservation.value. In the model info, value seems to be specifically tied to System.Concept. However, the QI-Core STU 6 Simple Observation seems to support more than this type. Thoughts?
@jenseeman jenseeman added the md impact tracking The issue is impacting measure development label Dec 5, 2024
@brynrhodes brynrhodes added the bug label Dec 17, 2024
@brynrhodes brynrhodes added this to the Maintenance milestone Dec 17, 2024
@brynrhodes brynrhodes self-assigned this Dec 17, 2024
brynrhodes added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 17, 2024
@brynrhodes
#1461: Fixed the value representation of the SimpleObservation profile
67d944c
JPercival added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 19, 2024
@brynrhodes @JPercival
#1461: Fixed the value representation of the SimpleObservation profile (
fc58202 
#1477)

Co-authored-by: JP <jonathan.i.percival@gmail.com>
@JPercival
Copy link
Contributor

Resolved by #1477

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@brynrhodes brynrhodes

Labels
bug md impact tracking The issue is impacting measure development
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Maintenance
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@brynrhodes @JSRankins @JPercival @jenseeman