Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

535 measure evaluation should respect improvement notation specified on group #540

Conversation

Capt-Mac
Copy link
Contributor

@Capt-Mac Capt-Mac commented Oct 2, 2024

closes #535

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 2, 2024

Formatting check succeeded!

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 2, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 90.90909% with 10 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 72.63%. Comparing base (bd2018d) to head (3aaf36f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
.../fhir/cr/measure/dstu3/Dstu3MeasureDefBuilder.java 45.45% 4 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
.../cqf/fhir/cr/measure/r4/R4MeasureReportScorer.java 91.17% 1 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
...hir/cr/measure/dstu3/Dstu3MeasureReportScorer.java 80.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #540      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     72.61%   72.63%   +0.02%     
  Complexity       19       19              
============================================
  Files           362      362              
  Lines         18603    18650      +47     
  Branches       2874     2875       +1     
============================================
+ Hits          13508    13546      +38     
- Misses         3734     3740       +6     
- Partials       1361     1364       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Oct 4, 2024

@Capt-Mac Capt-Mac merged commit 167429f into master Oct 4, 2024
8 checks passed
@Capt-Mac Capt-Mac deleted the 535-measure-evaluation-should-respect-improvement-notation-specified-on-group branch October 4, 2024 21:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Measure Evaluation should respect 'Improvement Notation' specified on Group
2 participants