[ENH] add basic QC (Sourcery refactored)

[sourcery-ai]

Pull Request #102 refactored by Sourcery.

Since the original Pull Request was opened as a fork in a contributor's
repository, we are unable to create a Pull Request branching from it.

To incorporate these changes, you can either:

1. Merge this Pull Request instead of the original, or

2. Ask your contributor to locally incorporate these commits and push them to
   the original Pull Request

   Incorporate changes via command line

   git fetch https://github.com/cpp-lln-lab/bidsMReye pull/102/head
   git merge --ff-only FETCH_HEAD
   git push

NOTE: As code is pushed to the original Pull Request, Sourcery will
re-run and update (force-push) this Pull Request with new refactorings as
necessary. If Sourcery finds no refactorings at any point, this Pull Request
will be closed automatically.

See our documentation here.

Run Sourcery locally

Reduce the feedback loop during development by using the Sourcery editor plugin:

• VS Code
• PyCharm

Help us improve this pull request!

[sourcery-ai]

Sourcery Code Quality Report

✅  Merging this PR will increase code quality in the affected files by 1.23%.

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity	3.50 ⭐	2.47 ⭐	-1.03 👍
Method Length	74.60 🙂	77.32 🙂	2.72 👎
Working memory	7.02 🙂	6.92 🙂	-0.10 👍
Quality	71.61% 🙂	72.84% 🙂	1.23% 👍

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines	1029	1754	725

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
bidsmreye/generalize.py	64.54% 🙂	66.72% 🙂	2.18% 👍
bidsmreye/prepare_data.py	64.46% 🙂	68.35% 🙂	3.89% 👍
bidsmreye/quality_control.py		61.40% 🙂
bidsmreye/utils.py	75.13% ⭐	76.08% ⭐	0.95% 👍
bidsmreye/visualize.py		64.15% 🙂
tests/test_generalize.py	90.60% ⭐	85.83% ⭐	-4.77% 👎
tests/test_quality_control.py		90.20% ⭐
tests/test_visualize.py		93.69% ⭐
tests/utils.py		84.76% ⭐

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation
bidsmreye/quality_control.py	compute_robust_outliers	6 ⭐	300 ⛔	14 😞	40.66% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
bidsmreye/visualize.py	plot_time_series	4 ⭐	274 ⛔	13 😞	44.99% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
bidsmreye/generalize.py	process_subject	4 ⭐	216 ⛔	12 😞	49.66% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
bidsmreye/utils.py	Config.check_argument	11 🙂	177 😞	9 🙂	51.74% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods
bidsmreye/utils.py	Config.__attrs_post_init__	9 🙂	214 ⛔	7 🙂	55.23% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

• ⭐ excellent
• 🙂 good
• 😞 poor
• ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

---

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Help us improve this quality report!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 88.08511% with 28 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 75.00%. Comparing base (001c90c) to head (7ce73b3).
Report is 169 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
bidsmreye/utils.py	57.14%	8 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
bidsmreye/prepare_data.py	42.85%	8 Missing ⚠️
bidsmreye/quality_control.py	94.21%	3 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
bidsmreye/generalize.py	75.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
bidsmreye/visualize.py	98.50%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #104      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   65.45%   75.00%   +9.54%     
==========================================
  Files           7        9       +2     
  Lines         576      776     +200     
  Branches       88      104      +16     
==========================================
+ Hits          377      582     +205     
+ Misses        167      151      -16     
- Partials       32       43      +11     

Flag	Coverage Δ
tests	74.87% <87.65%> (+9.41%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.