Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ibc-go v3.1.0 with sdk 46 #1707

Closed
wants to merge 8 commits into from

Conversation

faddat
Copy link
Contributor

@faddat faddat commented Jul 14, 2022

Description

I'd like to get this into a tagged release form after review

This is a notional-umee collaboration.

On today's cosmos SDK call there was some lamentation of the lack of 46 support, and Robert pointed out something pretty important to me: the v4/main I am building against in #1653 isn't yet stable and that could lead to yet more unplesantry.

Robert got this kicked off, and I finished it up. Should be a nice, stable solution for using 46, and I have a specific ask:

can we please tag this so that those of us working with 46 do not need to litter go.mod with a bunch of replace statements?

I was thinking something like:

v3.1.0-46

Cant targeta a PR to a branch that doesn't exist, but might also be a good idea to make a branch like:

release/v3.1.0-46

The list of teams attempting to use 46 and hitting friction because there's not a tagged release of ibc-go that supports 46 is long and getting longer.

  • craft
  • pylons
  • dig
  • umee (maybe)
  • quicksilver
  • sei
  • wasmd
  • juno

....and more


Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

  • Targeted PR against correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md)
  • Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Code follows the module structure standards.
  • Wrote unit and integration tests
  • Updated relevant documentation (docs/) or specification (x/<module>/spec/)
  • Added relevant godoc comments.
  • Added a relevant changelog entry to the Unreleased section in CHANGELOG.md
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer
  • Review Codecov Report in the comment section below once CI passes

@crodriguezvega
Copy link
Contributor

crodriguezvega commented Jul 14, 2022

hey @faddat, thanks a lot for opening this PR. Let's work together to get this passing the tests as soon as possible! 👍

Can you please rebase your branch with the branch release/v3.3.x and target the PR against the branch release/v3.3.x? I think some tests are failing now because the require go 1.18 and release/v3.1.x is using go 1.17.

We will most likely release the upgrade to SDK 0.46 as v3.3.0. There is already a release/v3.2.x but that will be used to continue releasing new patch versions of SDK 0.45.

@faddat
Copy link
Contributor Author

faddat commented Jul 15, 2022

got it! yeah happy to do so. Will get on that now.

@faddat
Copy link
Contributor Author

faddat commented Jul 15, 2022

For the sake of convenience, I'm just going to close this pull request and open a new one.

@faddat faddat closed this Jul 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants