-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 636
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
IsFrozen() changed to Status() #140
Merged
Merged
Changes from 12 commits
Commits
Show all changes
23 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8a5ab72
initial work, pause for feedback
colin-axner 7afeca9
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:cosmos/ibc-go into colin/98-client-…
colin-axner 0db05e6
IsFrozen() -> Status()
colin-axner 47448e1
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:cosmos/ibc-go into colin/98-client-…
colin-axner 7899060
fix bug
colin-axner 400e719
fix tests
colin-axner e34a9af
remove typo
colin-axner 9c4c899
add verify tests
colin-axner dc26cd3
error message and code cleanup
colin-axner 94cafbe
self review fixes
colin-axner 3ed46b2
Update modules/core/02-client/keeper/client.go
colin-axner 2ae5339
Merge branch 'main' into colin/98-client-status
colin-axner ffd9e1b
add gRPC route to proto
colin-axner 2f67828
add gRPC route and tests
colin-axner ea8644a
update changelog
colin-axner cb0eb3f
apply review suggestions
colin-axner 0ac6588
Update modules/light-clients/06-solomachine/types/client_state_test.go
colin-axner 8c4b1f1
code ordering
colin-axner d3e203c
Merge branch 'colin/98-client-status' of github.com:cosmos/ibc-go int…
colin-axner 470dff8
Merge branch 'main' into colin/98-client-status
colin-axner 90c9f29
add set consensus state helper function
colin-axner cca717d
use typed string for status
colin-axner 2ad2e25
Merge branch 'main' into colin/98-client-status
colin-axner File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why don't you have this check in future function?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added this because the consensus state is required to know the correct timestamp. The future function doesn't need to pass in a timestamp and thus the consensus state isn't needed. Checking for the existence of the consensus state would break a test case below, I'm fairly sure - "consensus state not found"