You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Some testcases become tricky to fit into the general pattern of table structured tests we follow within ibc-go.
This testcase will require creating an additional test function.
In a channel upgrade crossing hello scenario both parties may perform both INIT and TRY steps.
A timing sensitive case allows both parties to also perform the TRY step. Consider chainA(INIT), chainB(INIT), chainA(TRY) and chainB(TRY) - chainB(TRY) will only succeed if a historical proof is submitted of the channel state prior to chainA(TRY).
For Admin Use
Not duplicate issue
Appropriate labels applied
Appropriate contributors tagged/assigned
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Summary
Some testcases become tricky to fit into the general pattern of table structured tests we follow within ibc-go.
This testcase will require creating an additional test function.
See thread
In a channel upgrade crossing hello scenario both parties may perform both INIT and TRY steps.
A timing sensitive case allows both parties to also perform the TRY step. Consider chainA(INIT), chainB(INIT), chainA(TRY) and chainB(TRY) - chainB(TRY) will only succeed if a historical proof is submitted of the channel state prior to chainA(TRY).
For Admin Use
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: