Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: typos and improve phrasing #23169

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

leopardracer
Copy link

@leopardracer leopardracer commented Jan 3, 2025

This pull request contains changes to improve clarity, correctness and structure.

Description correction:
Corrected used for only store to used only for store
Corrected duplicate to duplicates (in the context of the code, it might be more logical to use the word duplicates in the plural, since we are talking about multiple accounts)

Please review the changes and let me know if any additional changes are needed.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated comment documentation for PebbleDB with minor grammatical improvement
    • Modified error message in ValidateGenAccounts function to use "duplicates" instead of "duplicate"

These changes are purely textual and do not impact the functional behavior of the code.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 3, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request involves two minor textual modifications in different files. In store/v2/db/pebbledb.go, a comment documentation for the PebbleDB struct has been slightly rephrased from "It is used for only store v2 migration" to "It is used only for store v2 migration." In x/auth/types/genesis.go, the error message in the ValidateGenAccounts function has been updated from "duplicate account found" to "duplicates account found". These changes do not impact the functional behavior of the code.

Changes

File Change Summary
store/v2/db/pebbledb.go Minor comment documentation text modification
x/auth/types/genesis.go Updated error message text in ValidateGenAccounts function

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

C:Store, C:x/auth

Suggested reviewers

  • akhilkumarpilli
  • lucaslopezf
  • testinginprod
  • sontrinh16

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d8c8458 and 4333750.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • store/v2/db/pebbledb.go (1 hunks)
  • x/auth/types/genesis.go (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • x/auth/types/genesis.go
  • store/v2/db/pebbledb.go

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@aljo242
Copy link
Contributor

aljo242 commented Jan 3, 2025

Closing as this goes against our CONTRIBUTING guidelines

@aljo242 aljo242 closed this Jan 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants