Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(sims): Do not panic on legacy proposals #21784

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

alpe
Copy link
Contributor

@alpe alpe commented Sep 17, 2024

Description

This code slipped in from app v2 testing. No need to panic for legacy proposals in v1


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Removed panic conditions related to legacy proposals, allowing for more flexible handling of legacy data without runtime errors.

@alpe alpe added the backport/v0.52.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.52's next stable release label Sep 17, 2024
@alpe alpe requested a review from a team as a code owner September 17, 2024 16:41
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 17, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve the removal of panic conditions in the prepareWeightedOps function of the simsx/runner.go file. Specifically, the checks for the presence of legacy proposals and legacy proposal contents have been eliminated, allowing these collections to potentially contain elements without triggering a runtime error. This adjustment simplifies the control flow related to legacy data handling within the function.

Changes

File Change Summary
simsx/runner.go Removed panic conditions related to legacy proposals and contents in the prepareWeightedOps function.

Possibly related PRs

  • test: fix sims #21735: Modifications in testutils/sims/runner.go to prevent runtime panics, aligning with the focus on improving error handling in the main PR.

Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ffc1609 and 4ed24ea.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • simsx/runner.go (0 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (1)
  • simsx/runner.go

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@alpe your pull request is missing a changelog!

@julienrbrt
Copy link
Member

linter is complaining about unused slices.

@alpe
Copy link
Contributor Author

alpe commented Sep 18, 2024

linter is complaining about unused slices.

The linter is correct. There is more to do. I will add this to sim after import fix

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport/v0.52.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.52's next stable release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants