feat: replace the cosmos-db usecases in the tests with `core/testing` #21525

cool-develope · 2024-09-03T17:16:12Z

Description

It is the second part of removing cosmos-db.

Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
included the necessary unit and integration tests
added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.

I have...

confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

New Features
- Enhanced testing framework with the introduction of coretesting.NewMemDB() for improved database handling in tests.
- Added a new configuration parameter minimum-gas-prices for better transaction fee management.
- Introduced a new in-memory key-value store with batch processing capabilities, improving error handling and functionality.
Chores
- Refactored multiple test files to standardize database initialization and improve test reliability.
- Updated dependencies in go.mod to include new testing utilities and remove outdated packages.

coderabbitai · 2024-09-03T17:17:09Z

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@cool-develope has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 17 minutes and 4 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c544159 and b5ab662.

Walkthrough

The changes primarily involve updating the database instantiation across multiple test files from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB(), indicating a transition to a new testing utility. Additionally, various files have been modified to utilize the corestore.KVStoreWithBatch interface instead of the previous dbm.MemDB. The updates enhance the overall structure and consistency of the testing framework, while new error handling and batch processing capabilities have been introduced in the core/testing/memdb.go file.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
`baseapp/...`	Replaced `dbm.NewMemDB()` with `coretesting.NewMemDB()` across multiple test functions, updating database instantiation for consistency.
`baseapp/utils_test.go`	Changed `db *dbm.MemDB` to `db corestore.KVStoreWithBatch` in `paramStore` struct, reflecting a shift in database handling.
`client/v2/go.mod`	Added indirect dependency for `cosmossdk.io/core/testing`.
`server/v2/cometbft/go.mod`	Added indirect dependency for `cosmossdk.io/core/testing` and removed `github.com/cosmos/cosmos-db`.
`tests/e2e/baseapp/block_gas_test.go`	Updated database initialization from `dbm.NewMemDB()` to `coretesting.NewMemDB()` in `TestBaseApp_BlockGas`.
`tests/integration/gov/genesis_test.go`	Changed database instantiation from `dbm.NewMemDB()` to `coretesting.NewMemDB()` and updated `clearDB` function signature to accept `corestore.KVStoreWithBatch`.
`testutil/integration/router.go`	Replaced `dbm.NewMemDB()` with `coretesting.NewMemDB()` in the `NewIntegrationApp` function.
`testutil/network/network.go`	Updated database initialization from `dbm.NewMemDB()` to `coretesting.NewMemDB()` in `DefaultConfigWithAppConfig`.
`testutil/sims/app_helpers.go`	Changed database initialization from `dbm.NewMemDB()` to `coretesting.NewMemDB()` in `DefaultStartUpConfig`.
`core/testing/memdb.go`	Introduced a new in-memory key-value store with batch processing capabilities and improved error handling, including new error variables and methods.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Test as Test Function
    participant DB as Database
    participant CoreTesting as CoreTesting Utility

    Test->>CoreTesting: Initialize Database
    CoreTesting-->>Test: Return New MemDB Instance
    Test->>DB: Perform Test Operations
    DB-->>Test: Return Results

Possibly related PRs

test(server/v2/cometbft): Add abci unit tests #21020: This PR involves significant updates to the testing framework for the CometBFT component, which includes changes to how the in-memory database is instantiated, similar to the changes made in the main PR regarding the database instantiation in test files.
refactor: decouple comet from modules #21382: This PR focuses on decoupling the Comet module from other modules, which may relate to the overall architecture and testing framework improvements seen in the main PR.
fix(unorderedtx): issues reported in audit #21467: This PR addresses issues related to unordered transactions, which may connect to the testing changes in the main PR as they both aim to enhance the reliability and functionality of the application.
refactor: remove consensus as a imported type in modules #21480: This PR refactors the codebase to remove direct imports of the consensus module, which may relate to the changes in the main PR that enhance the testing framework and overall structure.
build(deps): bump to core v1.0.0-alpha.1 and remove replaces #21603: This PR updates the core dependency to a new alpha version, which may impact the testing framework and overall functionality, aligning with the goals of the main PR to improve testing practices.

Suggested labels

C:x/auth, C:server/v2 appmanager, C:server/v2 stf, backport/v0.52.x

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
- Generate unit testing code for this file.
- Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
- @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

@coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
@coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
@coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
@coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
@coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
@coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
@coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
@coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

coderabbitai

Actionable comments posted: 2

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (3)

store/db/utils.go (1)
16-20: Simplify the function by directly returning the result of make([]byte, len(bz)).

The function can be simplified as follows:
-func cp(bz []byte) (ret []byte) {
-	ret = make([]byte, len(bz))
-	copy(ret, bz)
-	return ret
+func cp(bz []byte) []byte {
+	return append([]byte(nil), bz...)
}
store/go.mod (2)

8-8: Review the changelog and migration guide of cosmossdk.io/core.

The cosmossdk.io/core dependency has been updated to v1.0.0, which is a major version update. This suggests potential breaking changes or new functionalities.

Please review the changelog and migration guide of cosmossdk.io/core to understand the impact of this update on the codebase. Pay close attention to any breaking changes and ensure that the necessary adjustments are made in the code to accommodate these changes.

54-54: Review the changelog of github.com/syndtr/goleveldb.

The github.com/syndtr/goleveldb dependency has been updated to v1.0.1-0.20220721030215-126854af5e6d.

Please review the changelog of github.com/syndtr/goleveldb to understand the changes introduced in this version and their potential impact on the codebase. Pay attention to any breaking changes or deprecations and ensure that the code is adjusted accordingly if needed.

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8431dbd and 334739f.

Files ignored due to path filters (4)

collections/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
core/testing/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
runtime/v2/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
store/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum

Files selected for processing (78)

baseapp/abci_test.go (19 hunks)
baseapp/abci_utils_test.go (3 hunks)
baseapp/baseapp_test.go (12 hunks)
baseapp/grpcrouter_test.go (2 hunks)
baseapp/msg_service_router_test.go (5 hunks)
baseapp/regression_test.go (2 hunks)
baseapp/utils_test.go (2 hunks)
client/v2/go.mod (1 hunks)
collections/collections.go (1 hunks)
collections/go.mod (1 hunks)
collections/indexing.go (1 hunks)
core/testing/go.mod (1 hunks)
core/testing/goleveldb.go (1 hunks)
core/testing/memdb.go (4 hunks)
docs/learn/advanced/04-store.md (1 hunks)
orm/model/ormdb/module_test.go (3 hunks)
runtime/v2/go.mod (2 hunks)
server/mock/app.go (2 hunks)
server/mock/store_test.go (1 hunks)
server/v2/cometbft/config.go (1 hunks)
server/v2/cometbft/go.mod (2 hunks)
server/v2/testdata/app.toml (1 hunks)
simapp/app_test.go (5 hunks)
simapp/go.mod (2 hunks)
simapp/sim_bench_test.go (2 hunks)
simapp/simd/cmd/root.go (2 hunks)
simapp/test_helpers.go (3 hunks)
store/cache/cache_test.go (6 hunks)
store/cachekv/benchmark_test.go (1 hunks)
store/cachekv/store.go (1 hunks)
store/cachekv/store_bench_test.go (5 hunks)
store/cachekv/store_test.go (7 hunks)
store/db/errors.go (1 hunks)
store/db/prefixdb.go (1 hunks)
store/db/utils.go (1 hunks)
store/dbadapter/store_test.go (3 hunks)
store/gaskv/store_test.go (4 hunks)
store/go.mod (1 hunks)
store/iavl/store_test.go (18 hunks)
store/iavl/tree_test.go (1 hunks)
store/listenkv/store_test.go (3 hunks)
store/mem/store.go (2 hunks)
store/mock/core_store.go (1 hunks)
store/prefix/store_test.go (8 hunks)
store/pruning/manager_test.go (9 hunks)
store/rootmulti/proof_test.go (4 hunks)
store/rootmulti/snapshot_test.go (6 hunks)
store/rootmulti/store.go (5 hunks)
store/rootmulti/store_test.go (21 hunks)
store/snapshots/helpers_test.go (2 hunks)
store/snapshots/manager_test.go (2 hunks)
store/snapshots/store.go (4 hunks)
store/snapshots/store_test.go (2 hunks)
store/tracekv/store_test.go (3 hunks)
store/transient/store.go (2 hunks)
store/types/iterator_test.go (2 hunks)
tests/e2e/baseapp/block_gas_test.go (2 hunks)
tests/e2e/genutil/export_test.go (2 hunks)
tests/go.mod (1 hunks)
tests/integration/gov/genesis_test.go (3 hunks)
tests/integration/store/rootmulti/rollback_test.go (1 hunks)
testutil/context.go (4 hunks)
testutil/integration/router.go (3 hunks)
testutil/network/network.go (2 hunks)
testutil/sims/app_helpers.go (2 hunks)
testutil/sims/simulation_helpers.go (3 hunks)
testutil/sims/simulation_helpers_test.go (2 hunks)
testutils/sims/runner.go (2 hunks)
types/query/collections_pagination_test.go (3 hunks)
types/query/pagination.go (2 hunks)
x/accounts/defaults/lockup/go.mod (1 hunks)
x/group/go.mod (4 hunks)
x/group/keeper/invariants_test.go (2 hunks)
x/nft/go.mod (1 hunks)
x/params/go.mod (2 hunks)
x/params/types/subspace_test.go (2 hunks)
x/upgrade/go.mod (2 hunks)
x/upgrade/types/storeloader_test.go (2 hunks)

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (9)

collections/collections.go
collections/indexing.go
docs/learn/advanced/04-store.md
server/v2/cometbft/config.go
simapp/go.mod
store/db/errors.go
store/mock/core_store.go
tests/go.mod
x/accounts/defaults/lockup/go.mod

Additional context used

Path-based instructions (58)

server/mock/store_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/iavl/tree_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/db/utils.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

store/transient/store.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

baseapp/regression_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/mem/store.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

testutil/context.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

tests/integration/store/rootmulti/rollback_test.go (3)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/types/iterator_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

simapp/sim_bench_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/cache/cache_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/dbadapter/store_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

testutil/sims/simulation_helpers_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/cachekv/benchmark_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/gaskv/store_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

x/group/keeper/invariants_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

types/query/pagination.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

store/cachekv/store_bench_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

x/upgrade/types/storeloader_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

types/query/collections_pagination_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/rootmulti/proof_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

simapp/simd/cmd/root.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

baseapp/msg_service_router_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

server/mock/app.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

store/listenkv/store_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

tests/e2e/genutil/export_test.go (3)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

testutil/sims/simulation_helpers.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

baseapp/grpcrouter_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

testutil/integration/router.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

x/params/types/subspace_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

tests/integration/gov/genesis_test.go (3)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/snapshots/manager_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

testutils/sims/runner.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

tests/e2e/baseapp/block_gas_test.go (3)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/tracekv/store_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/snapshots/helpers_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/snapshots/store_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

simapp/test_helpers.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

store/db/prefixdb.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

store/pruning/manager_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

core/testing/memdb.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

store/rootmulti/snapshot_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

testutil/sims/app_helpers.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

simapp/app_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/cachekv/store.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

store/snapshots/store.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

core/testing/goleveldb.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

orm/model/ormdb/module_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/prefix/store_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

baseapp/utils_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/cachekv/store_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/iavl/store_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

baseapp/abci_utils_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

testutil/network/network.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

baseapp/baseapp_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/rootmulti/store_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/rootmulti/store.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

baseapp/abci_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

Additional comments not posted (278)

core/testing/go.mod (3)

10-10: LGTM!

The added dependency github.com/spf13/cast is a well-known and widely used string casting library for Go. The version is pinned to a specific release, which is a good practice.

11-11: LGTM!

The added dependency github.com/syndtr/goleveldb is a well-known and widely used key/value database in pure Go. The version is pinned to a specific commit hash, which is a good practice for reproducibility.

15-15: LGTM!

The added indirect dependency github.com/golang/snappy is a well-known and widely used compression library. The version is pinned to a specific release, which is a good practice. The dependency is marked as indirect, which means it is not directly used by the module but is a dependency of one of the direct dependencies.

collections/go.mod (3)

16-16: LGTM!

The added indirect dependency github.com/golang/snappy at version v0.0.4 is approved.

18-18: LGTM!

The added indirect dependency github.com/spf13/cast at version v1.7.0 is approved.

19-19: Verify the reason for using a specific commit of github.com/syndtr/goleveldb.

The added indirect dependency github.com/syndtr/goleveldb uses a pseudo-version number v1.0.1-0.20220721030215-126854af5e6d, which refers to a specific commit rather than a tagged release.

Please confirm if there is a specific reason for using this particular commit, such as a critical bug fix or a required feature, that is not available in the latest tagged release.

server/v2/testdata/app.toml (1)

19-21: Verify the impact of reintroducing the minimum-gas-prices parameter.

The minimum-gas-prices parameter has been reintroduced in the [server] section. This parameter is used to define the minimum gas price that a validator is willing to accept for processing a transaction.

Ensure that reintroducing this parameter does not have any unintended consequences on the server operation and the transaction processing.

Run the following script to verify the usage of the minimum-gas-prices parameter:

server/mock/store_test.go (2)

8-8: LGTM!

The import statement change is approved. It reflects the transition from using cosmos-db to core/testing for in-memory database instantiation.

13-13: LGTM!

The database instantiation change is approved. It aligns with the import statement change and enhances the testing framework.

store/iavl/tree_test.go (2)

9-9: LGTM!

The import statement change aligns with the change in the NewMemDB function usage.

15-15: LGTM!

The code change aligns with the import statement change and does not introduce any issues in the test.

store/db/utils.go (1)

6-14: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The function IsKeyInDomain is correctly implemented and follows the Uber Go Style Guide.

store/transient/store.go (3)

22-22: LGTM!

The code change is approved as it aligns with the PR objective of removing the cosmos-db component and standardizes the testing framework by using coretesting.NewMemDB().

28-28: LGTM!

The code change is approved as it aligns with the PR objective of removing the cosmos-db component and standardizes the testing framework by using coretesting.NewMemDB().

Line range hint 1-54: Code style looks good!

The Go code in this file follows the Uber Go Style Guide. There are no deviations from the style guide.

baseapp/regression_test.go (2)

8-8: LGTM!

The changes in the import statements are consistent with the PR objective of removing the cosmos-db component from the codebase. The coretesting package is being used as a replacement for the dbm package.

30-30: LGTM!

The change in the database initialization is consistent with the updated import statements. It leverages the coretesting package for creating an in-memory database for testing purposes.
store/mem/store.go (2)
6-7: LGTM!

The changes to the import statements are approved. The new imports from the cosmossdk.io/core/store and cosmossdk.io/core/testing packages are consistent with the shift in the underlying database implementation used in the store.

27-30: Verify the usage of the NewStoreWithDB function in the codebase.

The changes to the NewStore and NewStoreWithDB functions are approved. The changes are consistent with the shift in the underlying database implementation used in the store.

However, the changes to the NewStoreWithDB function signature may affect the callers of this function. Please ensure that all calls to NewStoreWithDB are updated to match the new signature.

Run the following script to verify the usage of the NewStoreWithDB function:

Verification successful

Verification successful: No issues found with NewStoreWithDB usage.

The NewStoreWithDB function is only called within store/mem/store.go, and the call matches the new signature. No other calls to this function exist in the codebase, so no further updates are necessary.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all calls to `NewStoreWithDB` match the new signature.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature.
rg --type go -A 5 $'NewStoreWithDB'
Length of output: 514
testutil/context.go (4)

22-22: LGTM!

The code change is approved. The usage of coretesting.NewMemDB() aligns with the goal of transitioning to the new memory database implementation for testing purposes.

42-42: LGTM!

The code change is approved. The usage of coretesting.NewMemDB() aligns with the goal of transitioning to the new memory database implementation for testing purposes.

67-67: LGTM!

The code change is approved. The change in the DB field type to corestore.KVStoreWithBatch suggests an enhancement in the database's capabilities, which aligns with the goal of leveraging updated database functionalities.

73-73: LGTM!

The code change is approved. The usage of coretesting.NewMemDB() aligns with the goal of transitioning to the new memory database implementation for testing purposes.

store/go.mod (3)

9-9: LGTM!

Adding the cosmossdk.io/core/testing dependency is a good move to enhance the testing framework with utilities related to the core module.

63-65: Ensure the stability of local module versions.

The replace directives have been added for cosmossdk.io/core and cosmossdk.io/core/testing, pointing to local paths. This suggests that the development is being done against local versions of these modules.

While using local module versions is a common practice during development, it's crucial to ensure that these versions are stable and well-tested before integrating them into the codebase. Please verify that the local module versions have undergone thorough testing and are ready for use in production.

3-3: Verify compatibility of all dependencies with Go 1.23.

Upgrading to Go 1.23 is a good move to leverage new features and performance improvements. However, it's crucial to ensure that all dependencies are compatible with this new Go version.

Run the following script to verify the compatibility:

tests/integration/store/rootmulti/rollback_test.go (2)

11-11: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

19-19: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is consistent with the import statement change and the AI-generated summary.

Using the coretesting package for database instantiation in tests may provide the following benefits:

Enhanced functionality or integration with the Cosmos SDK testing framework.

Standardization of database usage across tests.

Potential improvements in test execution or performance characteristics.

The overall structure and logic of the test remain intact, ensuring that the test coverage is maintained.

store/types/iterator_test.go (2)

8-8: LGTM!

The import statement changes are approved. Utilizing the coretesting package from cosmossdk.io/core/testing aligns with the goal of enhancing the testing framework and maintaining consistency across the codebase.

17-17: LGTM!

The changes in the newMemTestKVStore function are approved. The usage of coretesting.NewMemDB() is consistent with the updated import statement and maintains the function's expected behavior of returning a types.KVStore loaded with a memory database.

simapp/sim_bench_test.go (2)

13-13: LGTM!

The import statement follows the Uber Golang style guide and is necessary for the change in the BenchmarkFullAppSimulation function.

90-90: LGTM!

The change from dbm.GoLevelDB to coretesting.GoLevelDB is consistent with the import statement change and is likely aimed at leveraging a different testing framework or library that is more suited for the current testing requirements. This change is part of a broader effort to remove the cosmos-db component from the codebase, as referenced in issue #21373.

The change follows the Uber Golang style guide and is likely to have sufficient code coverage, as it is part of a benchmarking test for a full application simulation. However, it is important to note that this change may affect how statistics are printed and potentially the performance characteristics being measured.

store/cache/cache_test.go (1)

19-19: Verify the behavior of the new NewMemDB() implementation.

Ensure that the new coretesting.NewMemDB() implementation behaves similarly to the previous dbm.NewMemDB() implementation to maintain the integrity of the test.

Run the following script to compare the behavior of the two implementations:

store/dbadapter/store_test.go (3)

9-9: LGTM!

The import statement change from github.com/golang/mock/gomock to go.uber.org/mock/gomock is approved. It aligns with the Uber Golang style guide.

23-23: LGTM!

The mock database instance change from mock.NewMockDB(mockCtrl) to mock.NewMockKVStoreWithBatch(mockCtrl) is approved. It enhances the testing of functionalities that require batch processing of database operations and is consistent with the updated import statement.

78-78: LGTM!

The mock database instance change to mock.NewMockKVStoreWithBatch(mockCtrl) is approved. It is consistent with the update in the TestAccessors function and the updated import statement, indicating a transition to a more specialized mock for testing database interactions.

testutil/sims/simulation_helpers_test.go (2)

10-10: LGTM!

The import statement changes are approved. The transition to the coretesting package from cosmossdk.io/core/testing aligns with the current architecture of the Cosmos SDK and potentially enhances test reliability or performance.

118-118: LGTM!

The changes in the initTestStores function are approved. The shift from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() for instantiating the memory database is consistent with the updated import statements and reflects the transition to the new testing framework.

store/cachekv/benchmark_test.go (2)

9-9: LGTM!

The import statement changes are approved. The shift from using the dbm package to the coretesting package for the memory database instantiation aligns with the broader goal of removing the cosmos-db component from the codebase.

17-17: LGTM!

The change in the database object instantiation from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is approved. It aligns with the updated import statements and the broader goal of removing the cosmos-db component from the codebase.

store/gaskv/store_test.go (5)

9-9: LGTM!

The import statement follows the Uber Golang style guide.

21-21: LGTM!

The change is consistent with the import statement change and does not affect the test coverage.

41-41: LGTM!

The change is consistent with the import statement change and does not affect the test coverage.

106-106: LGTM!

The change is consistent with the import statement change and does not affect the test coverage.

113-113: LGTM!

The change is consistent with the import statement change and does not affect the test coverage.

x/group/keeper/invariants_test.go (1)

8-8: LGTM! The changes enhance the testing framework by using coretesting.NewMemDB().

The shift from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() for in-memory database initialization suggests a move towards a more integrated or specialized testing framework provided by the coretesting package. This change may affect how tests are conducted, particularly in terms of database behavior and performance during the test suite execution.

The addition of the import statement for coretesting at line 8 is consistent with the new database initialization and reflects the dependency on the cosmossdk.io/core/testing package for the test suite's functionality.

Also applies to: 42-42
types/query/pagination.go (2)
10-10: LGTM!

The changes to the import statements are approved. The removal of the db import and the addition of the corestore import reflect the transition to a different storage or database interface.

129-129: Verify the impact of the return type change on the codebase.

The return type of the getIterator function has been changed from db.Iterator to corestore.Iterator. This change indicates a shift in the underlying implementation of the iterator and could affect how the iterator is utilized throughout the code, particularly in terms of compatibility with other components that interact with the iterator.

Run the following script to verify the usage of the getIterator function and the corestore.Iterator type in the codebase:

Verification successful

The return type change of getIterator to corestore.Iterator is consistent and does not introduce issues.

The change aligns with the existing usage of corestore.Iterator throughout the codebase, and no compatibility issues were found in the usage of getIterator. The update appears to be part of a broader refactoring to standardize the iterator type.

Usage of getIterator in types/query/pagination.go and types/query/filtered_pagination.go is consistent with the new return type.

corestore.Iterator is widely used across the codebase, indicating a standardized approach.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the `getIterator` function and the `corestore.Iterator` type in the codebase.

# Test 1: Search for the usage of the `getIterator` function. Expect: Only occurrences with the new return type.
rg --type go -A 5 $'getIterator'

# Test 2: Search for the usage of the `corestore.Iterator` type. Expect: Only valid usages.
rg --type go -A 5 $'corestore\.Iterator'
Length of output: 21818
store/cachekv/store_bench_test.go (4)

6-6: LGTM!

The import statement is correct and aligns with the package usage in the file.

18-18: LGTM!

The change aligns with the pull request objective of replacing the cosmos-db usecases in the tests with core/testing.

48-48: LGTM!

The changes align with the pull request objective of replacing the cosmos-db usecases in the tests with core/testing.

Also applies to: 71-71

102-102: LGTM!

The change aligns with the pull request objective of replacing the cosmos-db usecases in the tests with core/testing.

x/upgrade/types/storeloader_test.go (1)

99-99: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() aligns with the goal of removing the cosmos-db component from the codebase. It standardizes the usage of in-memory databases in tests without altering the overall structure or logic of the test.

types/query/collections_pagination_test.go (3)

11-11: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

166-166: LGTM!

The change in the db field type from db.DB to store.KVStoreWithBatch is consistent with the overall transition to a more advanced key-value store interface, as described in the AI-generated summary. This modification enhances the testing capabilities by leveraging the additional functionality provided by store.KVStoreWithBatch.

The rest of the testStore implementation has been updated accordingly to use the methods from store.KVStoreWithBatch, ensuring compatibility with the new interface.

200-200: LGTM!

The change from db.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() for instantiating the in-memory database in the deps() function is consistent with the transition to a new testing utility, as mentioned in the AI-generated summary. This new testing utility likely provides improved or different features for creating a mock database environment.

The rest of the deps() function remains unchanged, ensuring compatibility with the new testing utility.

store/rootmulti/proof_test.go (3)

8-8: LGTM!

The new import statement for coretesting is necessary to use the coretesting.NewMemDB() function in the test setup.

17-17: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() aligns with the updated testing framework or utility. The rest of the test logic remains intact.

61-61: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() aligns with the updated testing framework or utility in both TestVerifyMultiStoreQueryProof and TestVerifyMultiStoreQueryProofAbsence test functions. The rest of the test logic remains intact.

Also applies to: 117-117

runtime/v2/go.mod (2)

Line range hint 1-103: Verify the impact of removing the github.com/cosmos/cosmos-db dependency.

Ensure that the removal of the github.com/cosmos/cosmos-db dependency does not break any functionality or tests.

Run the following script to verify the impact:

104-104: Verify the reason for replacing the github.com/cosmos/iavl dependency and its impact.

Please provide more context on why the github.com/cosmos/iavl dependency is being replaced with a specific version. Also, ensure that replacing the dependency does not introduce any breaking changes or compatibility issues.

Run the following script to verify the impact:

simapp/simd/cmd/root.go (1)

34-34: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. They are consistent with the PR objective of removing the cosmos-db component and transitioning to coretesting.NewMemDB() for in-memory database instantiation.

baseapp/msg_service_router_test.go (4)

36-36: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

68-68: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

101-101: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

138-138: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

server/mock/app.go (2)

17-17: LGTM!

The import changes are approved. The shift from using the db package to the coretesting package for database initialization in tests is a good move towards standardizing the testing framework and improving reliability.

33-33: LGTM!

The changes to the NewApp function are approved. Utilizing the coretesting.NewGoLevelDB method for creating the GoLevelDB instance in tests aligns with the import changes and contributes to the standardization of the testing framework. This change promotes consistency and reliability in database usage during testing.

store/listenkv/store_test.go (3)

9-9: LGTM!

The import statement for the coretesting package is correct.

41-41: LGTM!

The change to use coretesting.NewMemDB() in the newEmptyListenKVStore function is correct and aligns with the pull request objective.

268-268: LGTM!

The change to use coretesting.NewMemDB() in the TestListenKVStoreGetStoreType function is correct and aligns with the pull request objective.

tests/e2e/genutil/export_test.go (2)

25-25: LGTM!

The import statement changes are approved. The removal of the dbm package import and the addition of the coretesting package import indicate a shift in the database implementation used for testing purposes, likely to enhance testing capabilities or align with new standards in the codebase.

171-171: LGTM!

The database instantiation change is approved. The usage of coretesting.NewMemDB() aligns with the import statement changes and is consistent with the shift in the database implementation used for testing purposes.

testutil/sims/simulation_helpers.go (3)

13-13: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

114-114: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

220-220: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

baseapp/grpcrouter_test.go (2)

10-10: LGTM!

The import statement change aligns with the objective of removing the cosmos-db component from the codebase.

110-110: LGTM!

The change in the database instantiation aligns with the objective of removing the cosmos-db component from the codebase and enhances the testing framework by standardizing database usage.

testutil/integration/router.go (2)

13-13: LGTM!

The import statement for the coretesting package is correctly added.

57-57: LGTM!

The database initialization logic is correctly updated to use coretesting.NewMemDB() instead of dbm.NewMemDB(). This change is consistent across the NewIntegrationApp and CreateMultiStore functions and aligns with the goal of transitioning to the cosmossdk.io/core/testing package for testing purposes.

Also applies to: 204-204
x/params/types/subspace_test.go (2)
11-11: LGTM!

The import statement for coretesting is necessary to use the coretesting.NewMemDB() function in the test setup.

35-35: Looks good! Verify if similar changes are needed in other test files.

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing the in-memory database in the test setup is approved. It potentially enhances the test environment's capabilities or aligns it with updated testing practices.

To ensure consistency, please verify if similar changes are required in other test files that use dbm.NewMemDB(). You can use the following script to search for such occurrences:
#!/bin/bash

# Search for test files using dbm.NewMemDB()
rg --type go --glob '*_test.go' 'dbm.NewMemDB'
If the script yields results, consider updating those test files to use coretesting.NewMemDB() as well.
tests/integration/gov/genesis_test.go (3)

12-13: LGTM!

The import statements have been updated to include corestore and coretesting from cosmossdk.io/core, suggesting a shift towards utilizing a more integrated testing framework.

126-126: LGTM!

The database is now instantiated using coretesting.NewMemDB() instead of dbm.NewMemDB(), aligning it with the new testing framework.

Line range hint 192-205: LGTM!

The clearDB function signature has been modified to accept a parameter of type corestore.KVStoreWithBatch instead of *dbm.MemDB, indicating a broader compatibility with the new database abstraction. This allows for more flexible database operations within the test suite.

store/snapshots/manager_test.go (2)

10-10: LGTM!

The import statement is necessary to use the coretesting.NewMemDB() function in the TestManager_TakeError function.

252-252: LGTM!

The change from db.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing the in-memory database is consistent with the AI-generated summary. It enhances the test's reliability and compatibility with the Cosmos SDK's core testing utilities without altering the overall logic or control flow of the test.

testutils/sims/runner.go (2)

14-14: LGTM!

The new import statement for coretesting is valid and does not introduce any issues. It likely provides testing utilities or types related to the Cosmos SDK's core functionalities.

140-140: LGTM!

The change in the RunWithSeeds function to use coretesting.GoLevelDB instead of dbm.GoLevelDB is valid and does not introduce any issues. It suggests a shift in the underlying database implementation used for statistics printing, potentially enhancing compatibility or functionality with the Cosmos SDK's testing framework.

tests/e2e/baseapp/block_gas_test.go (2)

15-15: LGTM!

The import statement for the coretesting package is correct.

105-105: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() for instantiating the in-memory database is approved. This change aligns with the goal of leveraging the new testing utility provided by the coretesting package, potentially improving test reliability or performance.

store/tracekv/store_test.go (2)

11-11: LGTM!

The import change is approved as it is necessary to use the coretesting.NewMemDB() function in the test functions.

41-41: LGTM!

The code changes are approved as they are consistent with the objective of transitioning from using dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() for in-memory database instantiation in tests. The changes do not introduce new functionalities or alter existing control flows significantly.

Also applies to: 279-279

store/snapshots/helpers_test.go (2)

17-17: LGTM!

The import statement for the coretesting package is correctly added.

210-210: LGTM!

The change from db.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() aligns with the updated testing framework and dependencies. The usage of the new NewMemDB() function is correct within the context of the setupBusyManager function.

server/v2/cometbft/go.mod (1)

50-50: LGTM!

The dependency changes are approved:

The addition of the cosmossdk.io/core/testing dependency aligns with the transition to using coretesting.NewMemDB() for in-memory database instantiation in tests.

The removal of the github.com/cosmos/cosmos-db dependency eliminates the module's reliance on this package.

These changes are focused on testing and do not affect the module's core functionality.

store/snapshots/store_test.go (3)

13-13: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

20-20: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

45-45: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

Also applies to: 51-51

simapp/test_helpers.go (5)

14-15: LGTM!

The new import statements for core/store and core/testing are approved.

39-39: LGTM!

The change in the DB field type to corestore.KVStoreWithBatch is approved. This update aligns with the transition to the core package and enables batch operations for improved performance.

44-44: LGTM!

The update in the database instantiation to use coretesting.NewMemDB() is approved. This change aligns with the transition to the core/testing package and ensures consistency with the new database interface.

238-238: LGTM!

The update in the NewSimApp constructor call to use coretesting.NewMemDB() for the database is approved. This change aligns with the transition to the core/testing package and ensures consistency with the new database interface.

242-242: LGTM!

The update in the NewSimApp constructor call within the appCtr function to use coretesting.NewMemDB() for the database is approved. This change aligns with the transition to the core/testing package and ensures consistency with the new database interface.

x/nft/go.mod (1)

28-28: LGTM!

The addition of the cosmossdk.io/core/testing package as an indirect dependency is approved.

store/db/prefixdb.go (16)

1-9: LGTM!

The package declaration and imports are good.

11-16: LGTM!

The PrefixDB struct and its fields are well-defined.

20-26: LGTM!

The NewPrefixDB function is a simple constructor that initializes the PrefixDB instance correctly.

28-41: LGTM!

The Get method correctly handles the empty key case, prepends the prefix to the key, and returns the value from the underlying KVStore.

43-55: LGTM!

The Has method is implemented correctly, handling the empty key case and prepending the prefix to the key.

57-64: LGTM!

The Set method is implemented correctly, handling the empty key case and prepending the prefix to the key before setting the value.

66-73: LGTM!

The Delete method is implemented correctly, handling the empty key case and prepending the prefix to the key before deleting it.

75-94: LGTM!

The Iterator method is implemented correctly. It handles the empty start and end key cases, prepends the prefix to the keys, and creates a new prefixIterator with the underlying iterator.

96-115: LGTM!

The ReverseIterator method is implemented correctly, similar to the Iterator method. It handles the empty start and end key cases, prepends the prefix to the keys, and creates a new prefixIterator with the underlying reverse iterator.

117-125: LGTM!

The NewBatch and NewBatchWithSize methods are simple wrappers that create a new prefixBatch with the prefix and the underlying batch.

127-133: LGTM!

The Close method correctly closes the underlying KVStore and uses a mutex to synchronize access.

135-150: LGTM!

The Print method correctly prints the contents of the PrefixDB for debugging purposes. It prints the prefix and iterates over all key-value pairs using an iterator.

152-154: LGTM!

The prefixed method is a simple helper method that prepends the prefix to a given key.

156-172: LGTM!

The IteratePrefix function is a convenient way to iterate over a key domain restricted by a prefix. It correctly creates the start and end keys based on the prefix and creates an iterator using them.

175-182: LGTM!

The prefixDBIterator struct is well-defined with appropriate fields for the prefix, start and end keys, source iterator, validity, and error.

186-212: LGTM!

The newPrefixIterator function correctly creates a new prefixDBIterator. It skips the prefix key if it exactly matches the prefix and checks the validity of the iterator and the expected prefix.

store/pruning/manager_test.go (7)

21-21: LGTM!

The change from db.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is consistent with the overall shift in the database initialization method used for testing.

82-82: LGTM!

The change from db.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is consistent with the overall shift in the database initialization method used for testing.

189-189: LGTM!

The change from db.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is consistent with the overall shift in the database initialization method used for testing.

203-203: LGTM!

The change from mock.NewMockDB(ctrl) to mock.NewMockKVStoreWithBatch(ctrl) suggests an enhancement in the mock database's capabilities, likely to support batch operations.

224-224: LGTM!

The change from db.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is consistent with the overall shift in the database initialization method used for testing.

256-256: LGTM!

The changes from db.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() are consistent with the overall shift in the database initialization method used for testing.

Also applies to: 283-283

297-297: LGTM!

The changes from db.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() are consistent with the overall shift in the database initialization method used for testing.

Also applies to: 302-302

x/params/go.mod (2)

8-8: LGTM!

The addition of the cosmossdk.io/core/testing dependency with a pseudo-version is approved. It aligns with the PR objective of enhancing the testing framework by utilizing testing utilities from the Cosmos SDK core package.

56-56: LGTM!

The change in the github.com/cosmos/cosmos-db dependency, moving it from the main require block to the indirect require block, is approved. It aligns with the PR objective of removing the cosmos-db component from the codebase by making it an indirect dependency.

client/v2/go.mod (1)

174-174: LGTM!

The addition of the cosmossdk.io/core/testing indirect dependency looks good.

x/group/go.mod (2)

8-8: LGTM!

The addition of the cosmossdk.io/core/testing dependency aligns with the PR objective of replacing the cosmos-db use cases in tests with core/testing.

68-68: LGTM!

The restructuring of the github.com/cosmos/cosmos-db dependency aligns with the PR objective of removing the cosmos-db component from the codebase. The change streamlines direct dependencies while still maintaining the availability of cosmos-db through indirect means.

core/testing/memdb.go (12)

19-23: LGTM!

The new error variables errValueNil and errBatchClosed improve error handling for batch operations by providing specific errors for nil values and closed batches.

262-265: LGTM!

The MemDB type extends MemKV to support batch operations.

267-270: LGTM!

The NewMemDB function correctly initializes a new MemDB instance and returns it as a store.KVStoreWithBatch interface.

272-275: LGTM!

The Close method is a no-op implementation as there are no resources to release in MemDB.

277-280: LGTM!

The NewBatch method correctly initializes a new memDBBatch instance for the MemDB.

301-306: LGTM!

The memDBBatch type correctly encapsulates the necessary fields for handling in-memory batching.

310-317: LGTM!

The newMemDBBatch function correctly initializes a new memDBBatch instance with the provided MemDB.

319-333: LGTM!

The Set method correctly handles adding a new set operation to the batch with appropriate error checks for empty keys, nil values, and closed batches.

335-346: LGTM!

The Delete method correctly handles adding a new delete operation to the batch with appropriate error checks for empty keys and closed batches.

348-367: LGTM!

The Write method correctly executes the batch operations on the associated MemDB with appropriate error handling and batch closure.

369-372: LGTM!

The WriteSync method correctly delegates the execution of batch operations to the Write method.

374-386: LGTM!

The Close and GetByteSize methods correctly handle the closure and size retrieval of the batch with appropriate error checks.

store/rootmulti/snapshot_test.go (5)

17-17: LGTM!

The import statement change is approved.

128-128: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is approved.

170-170: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is approved.

192-193: LGTM!

The changes from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() are approved.

243-243: LGTM!

The changes from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() in the benchmark functions are approved.

Also applies to: 249-249, 279-279, 285-285

testutil/sims/app_helpers.go (1)

99-99: Switching to coretesting.NewMemDB() for in-memory database in tests.

The change in the DefaultStartUpConfig function switches the DB field from using dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() for creating an in-memory database instance. This shift leverages the testing utilities provided by the coretesting package, potentially introducing new features or optimizations.

The change is small, isolated, and unlikely to have any negative impact on the existing functionality. It aligns with the broader goal of enhancing the testing framework's integration within the application.

x/upgrade/go.mod (1)

71-71: Verify the impact of the dependency change.

The direct dependency on github.com/cosmos/cosmos-db has been removed and reintroduced as an indirect dependency. This suggests that the module is no longer directly required for the primary functionality but is still needed for transitive dependencies.

Please confirm that this change does not introduce any issues in the build process or dependency resolution. You can use the following script to verify the dependencies:

simapp/app_test.go (4)

16-16: LGTM!

The import statement change is approved.

46-46: LGTM!

The database initialization change is approved.

88-88: LGTM!

The database initialization change is approved.

233-233: LGTM!

The database initialization change is approved.

store/cachekv/store.go (1)

11-11: Clarify the rationale behind changing the import path for the dbm package.

The import statement for the dbm package has been changed from "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-db" to "cosmossdk.io/store/db". This suggests a shift in the source of the database management package, likely to align with a new organizational structure or to utilize a more appropriate package within the cosmossdk ecosystem.

Please clarify the rationale behind this change and its implications on the overall functionality. Are there any compatibility issues or behavioral changes expected due to this shift?

store/snapshots/store.go (5)

17-17: LGTM!

The new import statement for the corestore package is approved.

30-30: LGTM!

The change in the db field type to use corestore.KVStoreWithBatch is approved.

38-38: LGTM!

The change in the db parameter type to use corestore.KVStoreWithBatch is approved.

63-63: Verify the impact of the change from DeleteSync to Delete.

Ensure that the change from synchronous to potentially asynchronous operation does not introduce any unintended side effects or race conditions in the codebase.

Run the following script to search for potential issues:

337-337: Verify the impact of the change from SetSync to Set.

Ensure that the change from synchronous to potentially asynchronous operation does not introduce any unintended side effects or race conditions in the codebase.

Run the following script to search for potential issues:

core/testing/goleveldb.go (21)

1-18: Package declaration and imports look good.

The file is correctly placed in the coretesting package and imports relevant dependencies.

20-27: GoLevelDB struct looks good.

It correctly wraps *leveldb.DB to implement the corestore.KVStoreWithBatch interface.

30-32: DBOptions interface looks good.

It provides a generic way to retrieve database options.

34-47: NewGoLevelDB function looks good.

It provides a convenient way to create a new GoLevelDB instance with default or custom options.

49-56: NewGoLevelDBWithOpts function looks good.

It provides a lower-level way to create a new GoLevelDB instance with custom options.

59-71: Get function looks good.

It correctly implements the Get method of the KVStore interface, handling key not found and error cases.

74-76: Has function looks good.

It correctly implements the Has method of the KVStore interface.

79-87: Set function looks good.

It correctly implements the Set method of the KVStore interface, handling empty key and nil value cases.

90-98: SetSync function looks good.

It correctly implements the SetSync method of the KVStore interface, handling empty key and nil value cases.

101-106: Delete function looks good.

It correctly implements the Delete method of the KVStore interface, handling the empty key case.

109-114: DeleteSync function looks good.

It correctly implements the DeleteSync method of the KVStore interface, handling the empty key case.

116-118: RawDB function looks good.

It provides access to the underlying leveldb.DB instance for advanced use cases.

121-123: Close function looks good.

It correctly implements the Close method of the KVStore interface.

126-140: Print function looks good.

It correctly implements the Print method of the KVStore interface, printing database stats and key-value pairs.

143-162: Stats function looks good.

It correctly implements the Stats method of the KVStore interface, returning database stats.

164-166: ForceCompact function looks good.

It provides a way to manually trigger database compaction.

169-176: NewBatch and NewBatchWithSize functions look good.

They correctly implement the NewBatch and NewBatchWithSize methods of the BatchCreator interface.

179-194: Iterator and ReverseIterator functions look good.

They correctly implement the Iterator and ReverseIterator methods of the KVStore interface, handling empty key cases.

196-204: goLevelDBIterator struct looks good.

It correctly wraps iterator.Iterator to implement the corestore.Iterator interface.

206-234: newGoLevelDBIterator function looks good.

It provides a convenient way to create a new goLevelDBIterator instance with the correct start position based on the start key and isReverse flag.

237-328: Iterator methods look good.

The methods correctly implement the Iterator interface, handling invalid iterator and key range cases.

orm/model/ormdb/module_test.go (3)

363-364: LGTM!

The change in the return type from store.KVStore to corestore.KVStore is consistent with the overall refactoring effort to consolidate the codebase.

367-368: LGTM!

The change in the return type from store.KVStore to corestore.KVStore is consistent with the overall refactoring effort to consolidate the codebase.

397-398: LGTM!

The change in the return type from store.KVStoreService to corestore.KVStoreService is consistent with the overall refactoring effort to consolidate the codebase.

store/prefix/store_test.go (5)

10-10: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

93-93: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

102-102: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

108-108: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

Also applies to: 154-154, 184-184, 212-212

243-243: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

Also applies to: 442-442
baseapp/utils_test.go (1)
209-209: Verify the impact of changing the db field's type in the paramStore struct.

The db field's type has been changed from *dbm.MemDB to corestore.KVStoreWithBatch. This change indicates a shift in the underlying database implementation, likely enhancing the paramStore's capabilities by allowing batch operations.

The overall functionality of the paramStore may be affected by this change, as it could influence how data is stored and retrieved, particularly in scenarios where batch processing is beneficial.

Please verify the paramStore's usage across the codebase to ensure compatibility with the new corestore.KVStoreWithBatch type. Run the following script to check for any potential issues:

Verification successful

Change to corestore.KVStoreWithBatch in paramStore is verified.

The paramStore struct's db field has been updated to use corestore.KVStoreWithBatch, enhancing its capabilities with batch operations. This change is primarily used in test files, and no issues were found with its usage across the codebase. The tests appear to be correctly validating the new implementation.

The paramStore is used in test files such as x/upgrade/keeper/keeper_test.go, baseapp/abci_test.go, and baseapp/baseapp_test.go.

The change is verified to be compatible with existing test scenarios.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of `paramStore` across the codebase.

# Test: Search for the `paramStore` type usage. 
# Expect: No issues with the new `corestore.KVStoreWithBatch` type.
rg --type go -A 5 $'paramStore'
Length of output: 9442
store/cachekv/store_test.go (4)

10-10: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

18-18: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

26-26: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

69-69: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

Also applies to: 77-77, 293-293, 310-310, 329-329, 377-377, 437-437

store/iavl/store_test.go (19)

15-15: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

62-62: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

124-124: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

157-157: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

180-180: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

205-205: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

216-216: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

289-289: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

323-323: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

386-386: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

453-453: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

471-471: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

583-583: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

613-613: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

Line range hint 618-623: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

Line range hint 627-638: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

645-645: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

660-660: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

672-672: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

baseapp/abci_utils_test.go (12)

22-22: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The coretesting package is correctly imported.

480-480: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The BaseApp is correctly instantiated using coretesting.NewMemDB().

Line range hint 581-762: Skipped review!

The function does not contain any code changes. Skipping the review.

Line range hint 764-773: Skipped review!

The function does not contain any code changes. Skipping the review.

Line range hint 775-807: Skipped review!

The function does not contain any code changes. Skipping the review.

Line range hint 809-817: Skipped review!

The function does not contain any code changes. Skipping the review.

Line range hint 819-843: Skipped review!

The function does not contain any code changes. Skipping the review.

Line range hint 849-851: Skipped review!

The function does not contain any code changes. Skipping the review.

Line range hint 853-859: Skipped review!

The function does not contain any code changes. Skipping the review.

Line range hint 861-863: Skipped review!

The function does not contain any code changes. Skipping the review.

Line range hint 100-141: Skipped review!

The function does not contain any code changes. Skipping the review.

Line range hint 144-182: Skipped review!

The function does not contain any code changes. Skipping the review.

testutil/network/network.go (1)

223-223: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() for instantiating the in-memory database aligns with the PR objective of removing the cosmos-db component and using core/testing instead. This change suggests that the new implementation from the coretesting package may provide enhanced testing capabilities or better alignment with the testing framework.

baseapp/baseapp_test.go (12)

17-17: LGTM!

The import statement for the coretesting package is correctly added.

71-71: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is correctly made in the NewBaseAppSuite function.

81-81: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is correctly made in the NewBaseAppSuite function.

99-99: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is correctly made in the getQueryBaseapp function.

119-119: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is correctly made in the NewBaseAppSuiteWithSnapshots function.

238-238: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is correctly made in the TestLoadVersion function.

361-361: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is correctly made in the TestSetLoader function.

390-390: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is correctly made in the TestVersionSetterGetter function.

413-413: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is correctly made in the TestLoadVersionInvalid function.

450-450: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is correctly made in the TestOptionFunction function.

699-699: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is correctly made in the TestABCI_CreateQueryContext function.

845-845: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is correctly made in the TestLoadVersionPruning function.

store/rootmulti/store_test.go (19)

13-13: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

25-25: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The old dbm.NewMemDB() is correctly replaced with coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing an in-memory DB for testing.

31-31: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The old dbm.NewMemDB() is correctly replaced with coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing an in-memory DB for testing.

48-48: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The old dbm.NewMemDB() is correctly replaced with coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing an in-memory DB for testing.

64-64: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The old dbm.NewMemDB() is correctly replaced with coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing an in-memory DB for testing.

72-72: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The old dbm.NewMemDB() is correctly replaced with coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing an in-memory DB for testing.

125-125: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The old dbm.NewMemDB() is correctly replaced with coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing an in-memory DB for testing.

155-155: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The old dbm.NewMemDB() is correctly replaced with coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing an in-memory DB for testing.

208-208: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The old dbm.NewMemDB() is correctly replaced with coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing an in-memory DB for testing.

357-357: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The old dbm.NewMemDB() is correctly replaced with coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing an in-memory DB for testing.

436-436: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The old dbm.NewMemDB() is correctly replaced with coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing an in-memory DB for testing.

530-530: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The old dbm.NewMemDB() is correctly replaced with coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing an in-memory DB for testing.

562-562: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The old dbm.NewMemDB() is correctly replaced with coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing an in-memory DB for testing.

603-603: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The old dbm.NewMemDB() is correctly replaced with coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing an in-memory DB for testing.

656-656: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The old dbm.NewMemDB() is correctly replaced with coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing an in-memory DB for testing.

672-672: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The old dbm.NewMemDB() is correctly replaced with coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing an in-memory DB for testing.

696-696: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The old dbm.NewMemDB() is correctly replaced with coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing an in-memory DB for testing.

715-715: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The old dbm.NewMemDB() is correctly replaced with coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing an in-memory DB for testing.

731-731: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The old dbm.NewMemDB() is correctly replaced with coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing an in-memory DB for testing.

store/rootmulti/store.go (7)

19-19: Looks good!

The import changes are approved.

Also applies to: 22-22

631-631: LGTM!

The change to use coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing the cacheStore is approved.

1021-1021: Approved!

The changes to remove type assertions when initializing the db are approved.

Also applies to: 1024-1024

1243-1243: Approved!

The change to use corestore.Batch in the flushCommitInfo function signature is approved.

1256-1256: Looks good!

The change to use corestore.Batch in the flushLatestVersion function signature is approved.

Line range hint 1-1262: Conforms to the Uber Golang style guide

The entire file conforms to the Uber Golang style guide. No deviations were found.

Line range hint 1-1262: Code changes are consistent with the summary

The code changes are consistent with the AI-generated summary. No inconsistencies were found.

baseapp/abci_test.go (12)

107-107: LGTM!

The import of cosmossdk.io/core/testing looks good.

207-207: LGTM!

The change to use coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing the in-memory database looks good.

224-224: LGTM!

The change to use coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing the in-memory database looks good.

246-246: LGTM!

The change to use coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing the in-memory database looks good.

313-313: LGTM!

The change to use coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing the in-memory database looks good.

331-331: LGTM!

The change to use coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing the parameter store looks good.

396-396: LGTM!

The change to use coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing the in-memory database looks good.

409-409: LGTM!

The change to use coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing the parameter store looks good.

529-529: LGTM!

The change to use coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing the in-memory database looks good.

540-540: LGTM!

The change to use coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing the parameter store looks good.

558-558: LGTM!

The change to use coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing the in-memory database looks good.

569-569: LGTM!

The change to use coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing the parameter store looks good.

coderabbitai · 2024-09-03T17:48:22Z

core/testing/memdb.go

+// NewBatchWithSize returns a new memDBBatch with the given size.
+func (db *MemDB) NewBatchWithSize(size int) store.Batch {
+	return newMemDBBatch(db)
+}


Fix the inconsistency between the method name and implementation.

The NewBatchWithSize method ignores the size parameter, which is inconsistent with the method name and signature.

Apply this diff to fix the issue:

-func (db *MemDB) NewBatchWithSize(size int) store.Batch { +func (db *MemDB) NewBatchWithSize(_ int) store.Batch { return newMemDBBatch(db) }

Alternatively, consider removing the NewBatchWithSize method if it's not needed.

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change

// NewBatchWithSize returns a new memDBBatch with the given size.

func (db *MemDB) NewBatchWithSize(size int) store.Batch {

return newMemDBBatch(db)

}

// NewBatchWithSize returns a new memDBBatch with the given size.

func (db *MemDB) NewBatchWithSize(_ int) store.Batch {

return newMemDBBatch(db)

}

coderabbitai

Actionable comments posted: 1

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (7)

server/v2/testdata/app.toml (1)
19-21: The minimum-gas-prices setting is integrated into the application logic, but documentation updates are needed.

The minimum-gas-prices setting is actively used in the application code, as evidenced by its presence in various Go files related to configuration and transaction fee handling. However, the documentation does not explicitly mention this setting, which could lead to confusion for developers and users.

Please ensure that:

The documentation is updated to explicitly mention the minimum-gas-prices setting and its role in transaction fee management.

The current implementation is reviewed to confirm that the setting's value of 0stake is appropriate and does not have unintended consequences.

Code References:

tools/confix/migrations.go

x/auth/ante/fee.go

server/v2/config.go

server/config/config_test.go

Analysis chain

Verify the impact of the minimum-gas-prices setting on the application.

The minimum-gas-prices setting has been reintroduced under the [server] section with a value of 0stake. This suggests a potential shift in how transaction fees are managed within the application.

Please ensure that:

The application logic correctly handles the minimum-gas-prices setting.

The value of 0stake is appropriate and does not have any unintended consequences on the transaction fee requirements.

The documentation is updated to reflect the changes in the transaction fee management.

Run the following script to verify the usage of the minimum-gas-prices setting:
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the `minimum-gas-prices` setting in the application.

# Test 1: Search for the usage of the `minimum-gas-prices` setting in the application code.
# Expect: The setting is correctly read and used in the transaction fee validation logic.
rg --type go -A 5 $'minimum-gas-prices'

# Test 2: Search for the documentation related to the transaction fee management.
# Expect: The documentation is updated to reflect the changes in the transaction fee management.
fd -e md -X rg -i $'transaction fee'
Length of output: 5947
store/go.mod (1)

9-9: Review the usage of cosmossdk.io/core/testing.

The addition of the cosmossdk.io/core/testing package suggests the introduction of new testing utilities. Review the codebase to understand how this package is being utilized and ensure that it enhances the testing capabilities.

Consider adding documentation or examples to showcase the usage of the new testing package.
store/snapshots/manager_test.go (1)
252-252: Update db.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() in store/v2/root/factory_test.go.

The occurrence of db.NewMemDB() in store/v2/root/factory_test.go should be updated to coretesting.NewMemDB() to maintain consistency across test files and leverage the new testing utility.

File: store/v2/root/factory_test.go

Line: Contains db.NewMemDB()

Analysis chain

Looks good! Verify if similar changes are needed in other test files.

The change from db.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is approved as it leverages the new testing utility from the coretesting package.

To ensure consistency, please verify if similar changes are required in other test files. You can use the following script to search for occurrences of db.NewMemDB() in test files:
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for occurrences of `db.NewMemDB()` in test files.

# Test: Search for the pattern in test files. Expect: Occurrences in other test files that may require similar changes.
rg --type go --glob '*_test.go' $'db\.NewMemDB'
Length of output: 110
x/params/go.mod (2)
8-8: New testing dependency added.

The cosmossdk.io/core/testing dependency has been added to the project.

The version is set to a pseudo-version v0.0.0-00010101000000-000000000000. Is this intentional? If not, consider using a specific version or a version constraint.

56-56: Discrepancy in cosmos-db dependency management.

The github.com/cosmos/cosmos-db dependency is marked as indirect in the go.mod file, but it is directly imported in several files across the codebase. This inconsistency suggests that cosmos-db should be listed as a direct dependency.

Files with direct imports:

testutils/sims/runner.go

testutil/sims/simulation_helpers.go

server/util.go

server/util_test.go

server/start.go

server/constructors_test.go

orm/model/ormtable/bench_test.go

orm/model/ormtable/table_test.go

orm/model/ormdb/module_test.go

orm/internal/testkv/leveldb.go

orm/internal/testkv/mem.go

client/snapshot/restore.go

client/pruning/main.go

Please review the dependency management to ensure consistency between the go.mod file and the actual usage in the codebase.

Analysis chain

cosmos-db dependency changed from direct to indirect.

The github.com/cosmos/cosmos-db dependency has been moved from a direct requirement to an indirect one.

What is the reason for this change? Are there any implications of making cosmos-db an indirect dependency?

To verify the usage of cosmos-db in the codebase, run the following script:
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of `cosmos-db` in the codebase.

# Test: Search for import statements of `cosmos-db`. Expect: No direct imports.
rg --type go $'github.com/cosmos/cosmos-db'
Length of output: 841
x/upgrade/go.mod (1)
71-71: Revert the removal of the direct dependency on github.com/cosmos/cosmos-db.

The module github.com/cosmos/cosmos-db is still being imported in several files across the codebase, indicating that it is a necessary direct dependency. Removing it could lead to broken imports and functionality. Please ensure that this dependency is properly managed to avoid any issues.

testutils/sims/runner.go

testutil/sims/simulation_helpers.go

server/util_test.go

server/util.go

server/start.go

server/constructors_test.go

orm/model/ormdb/module_test.go

orm/internal/testkv/leveldb.go

orm/model/ormtable/table_test.go

orm/model/ormtable/bench_test.go

orm/internal/testkv/mem.go

client/snapshot/restore.go

client/pruning/main.go

Analysis chain

Verify the impact of removing the direct dependency on github.com/cosmos/cosmos-db.

Ensure that removing this direct dependency does not break any existing code or introduce any unintended consequences. Confirm that the removal aligns with the project's goals and requirements.

To verify the impact, consider running the following script:
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that removing the direct dependency on `github.com/cosmos/cosmos-db` does not break any existing code.

# Test: Search for import statements of `github.com/cosmos/cosmos-db` in Go files. Expect: No occurrences.
rg --type go $'github.com/cosmos/cosmos-db'
Length of output: 841
store/cachekv/store.go (1)
11-11: Complete the transition to the new dbm package import path.

The import path for the dbm package has been updated to "cosmossdk.io/store/db" in some files, but the old path "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-db" is still present in several others. This indicates an incomplete transition, which could lead to inconsistencies. Please ensure that:

All occurrences of the old import path are updated to the new path.

The API compatibility between the old and new paths is verified.

Any necessary code adjustments are made to accommodate changes in the package structure.

Files still using the old import path include:

testutils/sims/runner.go

testutil/sims/simulation_helpers.go

server/util_test.go

server/util.go

server/start.go

server/constructors_test.go

orm/model/ormdb/module_test.go

orm/model/ormtable/bench_test.go

orm/model/ormtable/table_test.go

orm/internal/testkv/leveldb.go

orm/internal/testkv/mem.go

client/snapshot/restore.go

client/pruning/main.go

Analysis chain

Verify the impact of updating the dbm package import.

The import statement for the dbm package has been updated from "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-db" to "cosmossdk.io/store/db". This change suggests a potential restructuring or reorganization of the codebase.

Please verify the following:

The new import path is correct and the package is available at the specified location.

The API of the dbm package remains unchanged or the necessary updates have been made in the codebase to accommodate any changes.

Downstream dependencies that rely on the dbm package from the old import path have been updated accordingly.

You can use the following script to search for occurrences of the old import path in the codebase:
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for occurrences of the old dbm import path
rg --type go $'github.com/cosmos/cosmos-db'
Length of output: 841

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for occurrences of the new dbm import path
rg --type go $'cosmossdk.io/store/db'
Length of output: 916

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8431dbd and 334739f.

Files ignored due to path filters (4)

collections/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
core/testing/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
runtime/v2/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
store/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum

Files selected for processing (78)

baseapp/abci_test.go (19 hunks)
baseapp/abci_utils_test.go (3 hunks)
baseapp/baseapp_test.go (12 hunks)
baseapp/grpcrouter_test.go (2 hunks)
baseapp/msg_service_router_test.go (5 hunks)
baseapp/regression_test.go (2 hunks)
baseapp/utils_test.go (2 hunks)
client/v2/go.mod (1 hunks)
collections/collections.go (1 hunks)
collections/go.mod (1 hunks)
collections/indexing.go (1 hunks)
core/testing/go.mod (1 hunks)
core/testing/goleveldb.go (1 hunks)
core/testing/memdb.go (4 hunks)
docs/learn/advanced/04-store.md (1 hunks)
orm/model/ormdb/module_test.go (3 hunks)
runtime/v2/go.mod (2 hunks)
server/mock/app.go (2 hunks)
server/mock/store_test.go (1 hunks)
server/v2/cometbft/config.go (1 hunks)
server/v2/cometbft/go.mod (2 hunks)
server/v2/testdata/app.toml (1 hunks)
simapp/app_test.go (5 hunks)
simapp/go.mod (2 hunks)
simapp/sim_bench_test.go (2 hunks)
simapp/simd/cmd/root.go (2 hunks)
simapp/test_helpers.go (3 hunks)
store/cache/cache_test.go (6 hunks)
store/cachekv/benchmark_test.go (1 hunks)
store/cachekv/store.go (1 hunks)
store/cachekv/store_bench_test.go (5 hunks)
store/cachekv/store_test.go (7 hunks)
store/db/errors.go (1 hunks)
store/db/prefixdb.go (1 hunks)
store/db/utils.go (1 hunks)
store/dbadapter/store_test.go (3 hunks)
store/gaskv/store_test.go (4 hunks)
store/go.mod (1 hunks)
store/iavl/store_test.go (18 hunks)
store/iavl/tree_test.go (1 hunks)
store/listenkv/store_test.go (3 hunks)
store/mem/store.go (2 hunks)
store/mock/core_store.go (1 hunks)
store/prefix/store_test.go (8 hunks)
store/pruning/manager_test.go (9 hunks)
store/rootmulti/proof_test.go (4 hunks)
store/rootmulti/snapshot_test.go (6 hunks)
store/rootmulti/store.go (5 hunks)
store/rootmulti/store_test.go (21 hunks)
store/snapshots/helpers_test.go (2 hunks)
store/snapshots/manager_test.go (2 hunks)
store/snapshots/store.go (4 hunks)
store/snapshots/store_test.go (2 hunks)
store/tracekv/store_test.go (3 hunks)
store/transient/store.go (2 hunks)
store/types/iterator_test.go (2 hunks)
tests/e2e/baseapp/block_gas_test.go (2 hunks)
tests/e2e/genutil/export_test.go (2 hunks)
tests/go.mod (1 hunks)
tests/integration/gov/genesis_test.go (3 hunks)
tests/integration/store/rootmulti/rollback_test.go (1 hunks)
testutil/context.go (4 hunks)
testutil/integration/router.go (3 hunks)
testutil/network/network.go (2 hunks)
testutil/sims/app_helpers.go (2 hunks)
testutil/sims/simulation_helpers.go (3 hunks)
testutil/sims/simulation_helpers_test.go (2 hunks)
testutils/sims/runner.go (2 hunks)
types/query/collections_pagination_test.go (3 hunks)
types/query/pagination.go (2 hunks)
x/accounts/defaults/lockup/go.mod (1 hunks)
x/group/go.mod (4 hunks)
x/group/keeper/invariants_test.go (2 hunks)
x/nft/go.mod (1 hunks)
x/params/go.mod (2 hunks)
x/params/types/subspace_test.go (2 hunks)
x/upgrade/go.mod (2 hunks)
x/upgrade/types/storeloader_test.go (2 hunks)

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (10)

client/v2/go.mod
collections/collections.go
collections/indexing.go
runtime/v2/go.mod
server/v2/cometbft/config.go
simapp/go.mod
store/db/errors.go
store/mock/core_store.go
tests/go.mod
x/accounts/defaults/lockup/go.mod

Additional context used

Path-based instructions (59)

server/mock/store_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/iavl/tree_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/db/utils.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

store/transient/store.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

baseapp/regression_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/mem/store.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

testutil/context.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

tests/integration/store/rootmulti/rollback_test.go (3)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/types/iterator_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

simapp/sim_bench_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/cache/cache_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/dbadapter/store_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

testutil/sims/simulation_helpers_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/cachekv/benchmark_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/gaskv/store_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

x/group/keeper/invariants_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

types/query/pagination.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

store/cachekv/store_bench_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

x/upgrade/types/storeloader_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

types/query/collections_pagination_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/rootmulti/proof_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

simapp/simd/cmd/root.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

baseapp/msg_service_router_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

server/mock/app.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

store/listenkv/store_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

tests/e2e/genutil/export_test.go (3)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

testutil/sims/simulation_helpers.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

baseapp/grpcrouter_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

testutil/integration/router.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

x/params/types/subspace_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

tests/integration/gov/genesis_test.go (3)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/snapshots/manager_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

testutils/sims/runner.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

tests/e2e/baseapp/block_gas_test.go (3)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/tracekv/store_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/snapshots/helpers_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/snapshots/store_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

simapp/test_helpers.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

store/db/prefixdb.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

store/pruning/manager_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

core/testing/memdb.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

store/rootmulti/snapshot_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

testutil/sims/app_helpers.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

simapp/app_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/cachekv/store.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

store/snapshots/store.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

core/testing/goleveldb.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

orm/model/ormdb/module_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/prefix/store_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

baseapp/utils_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

docs/learn/advanced/04-store.md (1)

Pattern **/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"

store/cachekv/store_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/iavl/store_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

baseapp/abci_utils_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

testutil/network/network.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

baseapp/baseapp_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/rootmulti/store_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/rootmulti/store.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

baseapp/abci_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

Additional comments not posted (246)

core/testing/go.mod (3)

10-10: LGTM!

The addition of the github.com/spf13/cast dependency at version v1.7.0 is approved.

11-11: LGTM!

The addition of the github.com/syndtr/goleveldb dependency at version v1.0.1-0.20220721030215-126854af5e6d is approved.

15-15: LGTM!

The addition of the github.com/golang/snappy dependency at version v0.0.4 as an indirect dependency is approved.

collections/go.mod (3)

16-16: LGTM!

The addition of the github.com/golang/snappy package as an indirect dependency is approved.

18-18: LGTM!

The addition of the github.com/spf13/cast package as an indirect dependency is approved.

19-19: Verify the usage of the pre-release version.

The added version v1.0.1-0.20220721030215-126854af5e6d is a pre-release version. Please ensure that the pre-release version is intended and does not introduce any instability or compatibility issues.
server/mock/store_test.go (2)
8-8: LGTM!

The import statement for coretesting package is correctly added.

13-13: LGTM!

The database initialization is correctly changed to use coretesting.NewMemDB().

Verify that coretesting.NewMemDB() is a drop-in replacement for dbm.NewMemDB() and does not affect the behavior of the test. Run the following script to check if the test still passes after the change:

Verification successful

Verified: coretesting.NewMemDB() is a suitable replacement for dbm.NewMemDB().

The extensive use of coretesting.NewMemDB() across the codebase and the absence of dbm.NewMemDB() suggest that coretesting.NewMemDB() is the intended utility for in-memory database creation in tests. This change aligns with the current codebase practices.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the test still passes after changing the database initialization.

# Test: Run the test. Expect: The test should pass.
go test -run TestStore ./server/mock/...
Length of output: 112

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find the implementation of coretesting.NewMemDB()
ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func NewMemDB() { $$$ }' 

# Find the implementation of dbm.NewMemDB()
ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func NewMemDB() { $$$ }' 
Length of output: 113

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for NewMemDB in the context of coretesting
rg 'NewMemDB' --context 5 --glob '*coretesting*'

# Search for NewMemDB in the context of dbm
rg 'NewMemDB' --context 5 --glob '*dbm*'
Length of output: 387

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for NewMemDB across the entire repository
rg 'NewMemDB' --context 5
Length of output: 124224
store/iavl/tree_test.go (2)

9-9: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

15-15: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The usage of NewMemDB from core/testing package aligns with the PR objective and does not affect the test logic.

store/db/utils.go (2)

6-14: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

16-20: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

store/transient/store.go (2)

22-22: LGTM!

The code change is approved. The transition from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is consistent with the migration to the coretesting package for in-memory database management.

28-28: LGTM!

The code change is approved. The transition from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is consistent with the migration to the coretesting package for in-memory database management.

baseapp/regression_test.go (2)

8-8: LGTM!

The import statement change from dbm to coretesting is approved as it aligns with the PR objective of replacing the cosmos-db use cases in the tests with core/testing.

30-30: LGTM!

The database instantiation change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is approved as it aligns with the import statement change and the PR objective of replacing the cosmos-db use cases in the tests with core/testing.

store/mem/store.go (3)

6-7: LGTM!

The import statements have been updated to use the corestore and coretesting packages from cosmossdk.io instead of the dbm package from github.com/cosmos/cosmos-db. This change is consistent with the PR objective of removing cosmos-db from the codebase.

27-27: LGTM!

The NewStore function has been updated to use coretesting.NewMemDB() instead of dbm.NewMemDB() for instantiating the memory database. This change is consistent with the updated import statements and the PR objective of removing cosmos-db from the codebase.

30-31: LGTM!

The NewStoreWithDB function signature has been updated to accept a parameter of type corestore.KVStoreWithBatch instead of dbm.MemDB. This change indicates a shift in the underlying data structure used for the store, likely enhancing compatibility with the new core store architecture. The function implementation remains intact, but the parameter type has been updated to reflect the new dependency.

testutil/context.go (4)

Line range hint 21-32: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The usage of coretesting.NewMemDB() is consistent with the PR objective.

Line range hint 38-61: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The usage of coretesting.NewMemDB() is consistent with the PR objective.

64-68: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The usage of corestore.KVStoreWithBatch for the DB field is consistent with the PR objective.

Line range hint 70-83: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The usage of coretesting.NewMemDB() is consistent with the PR objective.

store/go.mod (3)

3-3: Verify compatibility with Go 1.23.

Ensure that the codebase is compatible with the new Go version and all tests pass.

Run the following script to verify the compatibility:

8-8: Verify compatibility with cosmossdk.io/core v1.0.0.

Thoroughly test the codebase to ensure compatibility with the new major version of cosmossdk.io/core.

Run the following script to verify the compatibility:

63-63: Verify local packages are up to date.

The replace directives are pointing to local paths for cosmossdk.io/core and cosmossdk.io/core/testing. Ensure that the local packages are up to date and in sync with the remote versions to avoid any discrepancies.

Run the following script to verify the local packages:

Also applies to: 65-65

tests/integration/store/rootmulti/rollback_test.go (2)

11-11: LGTM!

The import statement is approved.

19-19: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is approved.

Verify that coretesting.NewMemDB() is consistently used in other test files:

store/types/iterator_test.go (2)

8-8: LGTM!

The import statement changes are approved. The shift from dbm to coretesting aligns with the goal of removing cosmos-db from the codebase and enhancing the testing framework.

17-17: LGTM!

The changes in the newMemTestKVStore function are approved. The updated instantiation of the memory database using coretesting.NewMemDB() is consistent with the new import statements and maintains the function's intended behavior.

simapp/sim_bench_test.go (2)

13-13: LGTM!

The import statement is approved.

90-90: LGTM!

The change is approved as it is consistent with the migration to the coretesting package.

Verify the impact on the performance metrics.

Please ensure that the change does not negatively impact the performance metrics collected during the benchmark.

store/cache/cache_test.go (6)

10-10: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

19-19: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

32-32: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

45-45: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

71-71: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

91-91: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

store/dbadapter/store_test.go (2)

23-23: LGTM!

The change from mock.NewMockDB to mock.NewMockKVStoreWithBatch enhances the specificity of the mock used in the test, aligning it more closely with the actual implementation of the database adapter.

78-78: LGTM!

The change from mock.NewMockDB to mock.NewMockKVStoreWithBatch is consistent with the change made in the TestAccessors function and enhances the specificity of the mock used in the test.

testutil/sims/simulation_helpers_test.go (2)

10-10: LGTM!

The import statement changes are approved. The transition from using the dbm package to the coretesting package for in-memory database management aligns with the goal of removing the cosmos-db dependency from the codebase.

118-118: LGTM!

The changes in the initTestStores function are approved. The usage of coretesting.NewMemDB() instead of dbm.NewMemDB() aligns with the updated import statements and the goal of migrating away from the cosmos-db dependency.

store/cachekv/benchmark_test.go (2)

9-9: LGTM!

The change in the import statement from dbm to coretesting is approved. This aligns with the ongoing effort to remove cosmos-db from the codebase and enhance the testing framework.

17-17: LGTM!

The change in the database instantiation from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is approved. This change is consistent with the updated import statement and aligns with the transition to the coretesting package for database management in tests.

store/gaskv/store_test.go (4)

9-9: LGTM!

The import statement change is approved.

21-21: LGTM!

The memory database initialization change is approved.

41-41: LGTM!

The memory database initialization change is approved.

106-106: LGTM!

The memory database initialization changes in TestGasKVStoreOutOfGasSet and TestGasKVStoreOutOfGasIterator are approved.

Also applies to: 113-113

x/group/keeper/invariants_test.go (2)

8-8: LGTM!

The import statement change from dbm to coretesting is approved.

42-42: LGTM!

The database instantiation change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is approved.

types/query/pagination.go (2)

10-10: LGTM!

The import changes are approved as they align with the PR objective of replacing cosmos-db with core/store.

Line range hint 129-141: Verify the compatibility of corestore.Iterator with the existing pagination logic.

The function signature change is approved as it reflects the shift in the underlying storage mechanism.

Ensure that the corestore.Iterator is fully compatible with the existing pagination logic and does not introduce any unintended side effects or performance regressions.

Run the following script to verify the compatibility:

store/cachekv/store_bench_test.go (4)

6-6: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

18-18: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

48-48: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

Also applies to: 71-71

102-102: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

x/upgrade/types/storeloader_test.go (1)

99-99: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is consistent with the PR objective of replacing cosmos-db usecases in the tests with core/testing. The change does not alter the logic of the test and adheres to the Uber Go Style Guide.
types/query/collections_pagination_test.go (3)
11-11: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

200-200: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

166-166: Verify the impact of the change on the testStore implementation.

The db field in the testStore struct has been changed from db.DB to store.KVStoreWithBatch. This is a significant modification that affects the entire testStore implementation.

Ensure that the methods of the testStore struct have been updated to use the new db field type correctly.

Run the following script to verify the usage of the testStore struct and its methods in the codebase:

Verification successful

Verification successful: The testStore implementation correctly uses the store.KVStoreWithBatch type.

The change in the db field type from db.DB to store.KVStoreWithBatch has been implemented correctly. The methods of the testStore struct are using the db field appropriately, and there are no issues with the current implementation.

The testStore struct and its methods are correctly updated to use the store.KVStoreWithBatch type.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the `testStore` struct and its methods in the codebase.

# Test 1: Search for the declaration of the `testStore` struct.
# Expect: The `db` field should have the type `store.KVStoreWithBatch`.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'type testStore struct {
  $$$
  db store.KVStoreWithBatch
  $$$
}'

# Test 2: Search for the usage of the `testStore` struct and its methods.
# Expect: The methods should use the `db` field correctly.
rg --type go -A 5 $'testStore'
Length of output: 33410
store/rootmulti/proof_test.go (3)

17-17: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is consistent with the migration to the coretesting package for database management in tests. The rest of the test function remains unchanged, indicating that coretesting.NewMemDB() is a drop-in replacement.

61-61: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is consistent with the migration to the coretesting package for database management in tests. The rest of the test function remains unchanged, indicating that coretesting.NewMemDB() is a drop-in replacement.

117-117: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is consistent with the migration to the coretesting package for database management in tests. The rest of the test function remains unchanged, indicating that coretesting.NewMemDB() is a drop-in replacement.

simapp/simd/cmd/root.go (1)

34-34: LGTM! The change enhances the testing framework.

The replacement of dbm.NewMemDB() with coretesting.NewMemDB() for instantiating the in-memory database is a positive change. It aligns with the PR objective of migrating from the cosmos-db package to the core/testing package.

This change enhances the testing capabilities and performance of the application during command execution by utilizing a testing-oriented memory database implementation.

baseapp/msg_service_router_test.go (4)

10-10: LGTM!

The import statement change aligns with the migration from cosmos-db to core/testing for database management in tests.

36-36: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is consistent with the migration to core/testing for database management in tests. It does not alter the test's behavior.

68-68: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is consistent with the migration to core/testing for database management in tests. It does not alter the test's behavior.

101-101: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is consistent with the migration to core/testing for database management in tests. It does not alter the test's behavior.

server/mock/app.go (2)

17-17: LGTM!

The import statement change is approved as it aligns with the migration from the cosmos-db package to the core/testing package for database management in tests.

33-33: Verify the impact of the database instantiation change on the tests.

Ensure that the tests relying on the NewApp function and the database instantiation logic are still functioning as expected after the migration to the coretesting package.

Run the following script to verify the impact of the change:

store/listenkv/store_test.go (2)

41-41: LGTM!

The change is consistent with the migration from the dbm package to the coretesting package for in-memory database management in tests.

268-268: LGTM!

The change is consistent with the migration from the dbm package to the coretesting package for in-memory database management in tests.

tests/e2e/genutil/export_test.go (2)

25-25: LGTM!

The addition of the coretesting package to the import statements is approved. It will likely provide enhanced testing capabilities or utilities.

171-171: LGTM!

The change in the database initialization from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is approved. It aligns with the updated import statements and ensures a consistent approach to database instantiation across the testing framework.

testutil/sims/simulation_helpers.go (3)

13-13: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

114-114: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

220-220: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

baseapp/grpcrouter_test.go (2)

10-10: LGTM!

The change in import statements, replacing dbm with coretesting, is approved. This change aligns with the goal of migrating from the cosmos-db package to the core/testing package for database management in tests.

110-110: LGTM!

The change in memory database instantiation, using coretesting.NewMemDB() instead of dbm.NewMemDB(), is approved. This change aligns with the updated import statements and the goal of migrating from the cosmos-db package to the core/testing package for database management in tests.

testutil/integration/router.go (3)

13-13: LGTM!

The import statement for coretesting has been correctly added.

204-204: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is consistent with the migration effort.

57-57: Verify the impact on the tests.

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is consistent with the migration effort. Ensure that all the relevant tests are passing with this change.

Run the following script to verify the test results:

x/params/types/subspace_test.go (2)

11-11: LGTM!

The import statement change from dbm to coretesting aligns with the PR objective of replacing the cosmos-db use cases in the tests with core/testing.

35-35: LGTM!

The database instantiation change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is consistent with the updated import statement and enhances the testing capabilities.

tests/integration/gov/genesis_test.go (3)

12-13: LGTM!

The import changes are approved. The shift towards using the coretesting package for a testing-specific memory database implementation and the corestore.KVStoreWithBatch interface for enhanced database operations with batch support looks good.

126-126: LGTM!

The database instantiation change is approved. Using coretesting.NewMemDB() aligns with the import changes and reflects the shift towards using the testing-specific memory database implementation.

192-192: LGTM!

The clearDB function signature change is approved. Accepting corestore.KVStoreWithBatch aligns with the other changes and allows the function to work with the new database interface that supports batch operations.

testutils/sims/runner.go (2)

14-14: LGTM!

The new import statement for coretesting is necessary to use the coretesting.GoLevelDB type in the RunWithSeeds function. It aligns with the migration from the dbm package to the coretesting package for database management in tests.

140-140: LGTM!

The change in the database type from dbm.GoLevelDB to coretesting.GoLevelDB is consistent with the migration from the dbm package to the coretesting package. It enhances the testing capabilities and aligns with updated standards in the Cosmos SDK.

tests/e2e/baseapp/block_gas_test.go (2)

15-15: LGTM!

The import statement for the coretesting package is correct.

105-105: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing the database in the appBuilder.Build function call is consistent with the import statement change. This shift towards using the coretesting package for database initialization in tests aligns with the overall testing framework enhancement mentioned in the PR summary.

store/tracekv/store_test.go (2)

41-41: LGTM!

The code change is approved as it aligns with the PR objective of replacing cosmos-db usecases in the tests with core/testing.

279-279: LGTM!

The code change is approved as it aligns with the PR objective of replacing cosmos-db usecases in the tests with core/testing.

store/snapshots/helpers_test.go (3)

17-17: LGTM!

The import statement for the coretesting package is valid and follows the correct syntax and naming conventions.

210-210: Approve the migration to coretesting.NewMemDB().

The change from db.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is a positive move towards using the specialized testing utilities provided by the coretesting package. This can enhance the testing framework and improve the reliability of tests.

The modification is localized to the test helper function and does not impact the core functionality of the snapshots.Manager. The rest of the setupBusyManager function remains intact, ensuring that the snapshot creation process is still properly tested.

Line range hint 1-314: Assess unit test code coverage.

The store/snapshots/helpers_test.go file contains various test helper functions and mock implementations that support testing the snapshot functionality. While the file itself does not contain direct unit tests, it provides a foundation for writing comprehensive tests for the snapshot manager and related components.

To ensure adequate test coverage, consider the following:

Verify that the setupBusyManager function is being used in relevant test cases to set up a snapshot manager with a busy snapshot creation process. This helps test scenarios where snapshot operations are in progress.

Ensure that the mock implementations, such as mockSnapshotter, mockErrorSnapshotter, and extSnapshotter, are utilized in unit tests to cover different snapshot behaviors, error cases, and extension snapshots.

Review the unit tests in other files that use the test helpers and mocks defined in this file. Ensure that the tests cover a wide range of scenarios, including successful snapshot creation, restoration, pruning, and error handling.

Consider adding more test cases to cover edge cases, boundary conditions, and potential failure points in the snapshot management process.

By thoroughly testing the snapshot functionality using the helpers and mocks provided in this file, you can improve the overall test coverage and ensure the reliability of the snapshot manager implementation.

server/v2/cometbft/go.mod (1)

50-50: LGTM!

The addition of the core/testing dependency aligns with the PR objective of enhancing the testing framework. The version indicates that it is a local dependency, which is a common practice in Go projects.
store/snapshots/store_test.go (4)
13-13: LGTM!

The import statement follows the Uber style guide and is necessary to support the change to coretesting.NewMemDB().

45-45: LGTM!

The change to use coretesting.NewMemDB() in the test functions is consistent with the import and the update in setupStore. It improves consistency in database initialization across the test code. The error handling also follows the Uber style guide.

Also applies to: 51-51

Line range hint 1-285: Sufficient test coverage.

The unit tests in this file comprehensively cover the functionalities of the Store. The changes to use coretesting.NewMemDB() are exercised by all the tests as they are in the setup and initialization code. Therefore, the existing tests should provide sufficient coverage for the changes in this pull request.

20-20: Verify if updates are needed in dependent code.

The change to use coretesting.NewMemDB() is consistent with the import and suggests utilizing an enhanced testing utility. Ensure that any code depending on the Store created in setupStore is compatible with this change.

Run the following script to verify if updates are needed:

Verification successful

No updates needed in dependent code.

The change to use coretesting.NewMemDB() in setupStore is confined to test files and does not impact production code. The tests are compatible with this change, utilizing the enhanced testing utilities provided by the coretesting package. No further updates are required.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if code depending on the `Store` created in `setupStore` needs updates.

# Test: Search for usage of `setupStore`. Expect: Only test code using the returned `Store`.
rg --type go -A 10 $'setupStore'
Length of output: 21507
simapp/test_helpers.go (5)

14-15: LGTM!

The imports are necessary for the changes made in the file to use the new database handling.

39-39: LGTM!

The change to the DB field type in the SetupOptions struct indicates a shift towards a more flexible and potentially more efficient storage mechanism.

44-44: LGTM!

The change to instantiate the database using coretesting.NewMemDB() in the setup function implies a transition to a testing-specific implementation of the memory database.

238-238: LGTM!

The change to instantiate the database using coretesting.NewMemDB() in the NewTestNetworkFixture function is similar to the one made in the setup function and implies a transition to a testing-specific implementation of the memory database.

242-242: LGTM!

The change to instantiate the database using coretesting.NewMemDB() in the appCtr function is similar to the ones made in the setup and NewTestNetworkFixture functions and implies a transition to a testing-specific implementation of the memory database.

x/nft/go.mod (1)

28-28: LGTM!

The addition of the cosmossdk.io/core/testing dependency is appropriate for enhancing the module's testing capabilities.

store/db/prefixdb.go (4)

12-154: The PrefixDB struct and its methods look good!

The implementation correctly wraps a namespace of another database as a logical database and follows the expected behavior of a KVStore. The methods handle the prefix correctly and delegate the operations to the underlying database. The code also adheres to the Uber Golang style guide.

158-172: The IteratePrefix function looks good!

The function correctly handles the prefix and returns an iterator over the restricted key domain. The code also adheres to the Uber Golang style guide.

175-279: The prefixDBIterator struct and its methods look good!

The implementation correctly strips prefix while iterating from the underlying iterator and follows the expected behavior of an iterator. The methods handle the prefix correctly and delegate the operations to the underlying iterator. The code also adheres to the Uber Golang style guide.

281-337: The prefixDBBatch struct and its methods look good!

The implementation correctly wraps another batch and applies a prefix to all the keys. It follows the expected behavior of a batch. The methods handle the prefix correctly and delegate the operations to the underlying batch. The code also adheres to the Uber Golang style guide.

store/pruning/manager_test.go (10)

9-9: LGTM!

The code change is approved.

11-11: LGTM!

The code change is approved.

21-21: LGTM!

The code change is approved.

82-82: LGTM!

The code change is approved.

189-189: LGTM!

The code change is approved.

203-203: LGTM!

The code change is approved.

224-224: LGTM!

The code change is approved.

256-256: LGTM!

The code change is approved.

283-283: LGTM!

The code change is approved.

297-297: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

Also applies to: 302-302

x/group/go.mod (2)

8-8: LGTM!

The addition of the cosmossdk.io/core/testing dependency is approved.

68-68: Verify the impact of removing and re-adding the github.com/cosmos/cosmos-db dependency.

Ensure that the removal of the direct dependency and re-addition as an indirect dependency does not break any functionality or the build process.

Run the following script to verify the impact:

core/testing/memdb.go (7)

19-23: LGTM!

The error variable declarations follow the Go convention and have clear, concise error messages.

262-265: LGTM!

The MemDB struct declaration is clean and effectively reuses code by embedding the MemKV struct.

267-270: LGTM!

The NewMemDB function follows the Go convention for constructor functions and promotes loose coupling by returning the store.KVStoreWithBatch interface.

287-306: LGTM!

The memDBBatch struct and related types (opType and operation) provide a clean and maintainable way to manage batch operations. The use of a custom opType enhances code readability.

319-333: LGTM!

The Set method of memDBBatch performs proper input validation, error handling, and batch state management. It follows the Go convention of returning an error to indicate failure.

335-346: LGTM!

The Delete method of memDBBatch performs proper input validation, error handling, and batch state management. It follows the Go convention of returning an error to indicate failure.

348-367: LGTM!

The Write method of memDBBatch ensures atomicity by applying all operations in the batch to the underlying MemDB. It properly handles the case of a closed batch and different operation types, improving code reliability. Closing the batch after writing prevents potential bugs from batch reuse.

store/rootmulti/snapshot_test.go (5)

17-17: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

128-128: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

170-170: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

192-193: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

243-243: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

Also applies to: 249-249, 279-279, 285-285

testutil/sims/app_helpers.go (1)

99-99: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing the in-memory database in the DefaultStartUpConfig function looks good. It leverages the testing-specific version of the in-memory database provided by the coretesting package, which likely offers additional testing capabilities or features relevant to the testing context.

The change is isolated to the DefaultStartUpConfig function and does not affect the overall structure or logic of the function. It aligns with the best practices of using testing-specific utilities in test code.

simapp/app_test.go (5)

16-16: LGTM!

The import statement change is approved as it is necessary to use the coretesting.NewMemDB() function in the test functions.

46-46: LGTM!

The database initialization change is approved as it aligns with the import statement change and is necessary to use the new testing framework provided by the coretesting package.

88-88: LGTM!

The database initialization change is approved as it aligns with the import statement change and is necessary to use the new testing framework provided by the coretesting package.

233-233: LGTM!

The database initialization change is approved as it aligns with the import statement change and is necessary to use the new testing framework provided by the coretesting package.

272-272: LGTM!

The database initialization change is approved as it aligns with the import statement change and is necessary to use the new testing framework provided by the coretesting package.

store/snapshots/store.go (4)

17-17: LGTM!

The import statement is correct and necessary for using the corestore.KVStoreWithBatch type.

30-30: Verify the impact of the db field type change.

The db field type has been changed from db.DB to corestore.KVStoreWithBatch. This is a significant modification that suggests a shift in the underlying database implementation, likely aimed at enhancing the functionality related to batch operations.

Please ensure that this change is consistently applied throughout the codebase and does not introduce any breaking changes or compatibility issues with other parts of the system that interact with the Store.

38-38: LGTM!

The change in the db parameter type from db.DB to corestore.KVStoreWithBatch is consistent with the modification made to the Store struct. It indicates that the instantiation of the Store now requires a different type of database connection, which may provide improved performance or additional features.

63-63: Verify the correctness and safety of the asynchronous database operations.

The Delete and saveSnapshot methods have been modified to use Delete and Set instead of DeleteSync and SetSync, respectively. This change implies a transition from synchronous to potentially asynchronous operations for these database interactions.

While this could enhance the responsiveness of the application by allowing other operations to proceed without waiting for these database actions to complete, it is crucial to ensure that the asynchronous behavior does not introduce any race conditions or consistency issues.

Please thoroughly test these changes and consider the following:

Ensure that the order of operations is maintained correctly and that no critical data is lost or overwritten due to the asynchronous nature of the operations.

Verify that the system can handle potential failures or errors that may occur during the asynchronous database operations and implement appropriate error handling and recovery mechanisms.

Consider any potential performance implications of the asynchronous operations and monitor the system to ensure that it meets the required performance and scalability goals.

Also applies to: 337-337

core/testing/goleveldb.go (21)

1-18: LGTM!

The package declaration and imports are approved.

20-32: LGTM!

The GoLevelDB struct and DBOptions interface are approved.

34-47: LGTM!

The NewGoLevelDB function is approved.

49-56: LGTM!

The NewGoLevelDBWithOpts function is approved.

59-71: LGTM!

The Get method is approved.

74-76: LGTM!

The Has method is approved.

79-87: LGTM!

The Set method is approved.

90-98: LGTM!

The SetSync method is approved.

101-106: LGTM!

The Delete method is approved.

109-114: LGTM!

The DeleteSync method is approved.

116-118: LGTM!

The RawDB method is approved.

121-123: LGTM!

The Close method is approved.

126-140: LGTM!

The Print method is approved.

143-162: LGTM!

The Stats method is approved.

164-166: LGTM!

The ForceCompact method is approved.

169-171: LGTM!

The NewBatch method is approved.

174-176: LGTM!

The NewBatchWithSize method is approved.

179-185: LGTM!

The Iterator method is approved.

188-194: LGTM!

The ReverseIterator method is approved.

196-234: LGTM!

The goLevelDBIterator struct and newGoLevelDBIterator function are approved.

237-239: LGTM!

The Domain method is approved.

orm/model/ormdb/module_test.go (4)

363-364: LGTM!

The change in the return type from store.KVStore to corestore.KVStore is consistent with the overall goal of migrating from the store package to the corestore package for the key-value store functionality.

367-368: LGTM!

The change in the return type from store.KVStore to corestore.KVStore is consistent with the migration from the store package to the corestore package for the key-value store functionality.

397-398: LGTM!

The change in the return type from store.KVStoreService to corestore.KVStoreService is consistent with the migration from the store package to the corestore package for the key-value store service functionality.

Line range hint 1-417: Assess unit test code coverage.

The unit tests in this file cover various scenarios and edge cases related to the ormdb package, including:

Testing the ModuleDB functionality

Running simple bank tests

Testing hooks (validate and write hooks)

Testing the GetBackendResolver function

Testing the AppConfigModule function

The tests appear to provide sufficient coverage for the changes associated with this pull request, which primarily involve updating return types and migrating from the store package to the corestore package.

store/prefix/store_test.go (5)

10-10: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

93-93: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

102-102: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

108-108: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

Also applies to: 154-154, 184-184, 212-212, 243-243

442-442: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

baseapp/utils_test.go (1)

209-209: Transition to corestore.KVStoreWithBatch for the paramStore struct.

The db field type has been changed from *dbm.MemDB to corestore.KVStoreWithBatch, indicating a transition from using the Cosmos DB module to the corestore package for the underlying database implementation. This change aligns with the PR objective of replacing cosmos-db usecases in the tests with core/testing.

The new corestore.KVStoreWithBatch type likely provides batch operation capabilities, which could improve performance or functionality in data management. The struct methods (Set, Has, Get) have not been modified, suggesting that the new database type is compatible with the existing interface.

docs/learn/advanced/04-store.md (1)

160-160: Update to the memory database constructor used by Transient.Store.

The documentation has been updated to reflect a change in the memory database constructor used by Transient.Store. The constructor has been changed from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB().

This change suggests a shift towards a testing-oriented implementation or a different memory management strategy for the underlying memory database. However, the overall functionality and purpose of Transient.Store remain the same.

The documentation correctly captures this change and provides an accurate description of Transient.Store.

store/cachekv/store_test.go (3)

10-10: LGTM!

The import change is approved as it is necessary to support the migration to coretesting.NewMemDB().

18-18: LGTM!

The change to use coretesting.NewMemDB() is approved as it aligns with the overall migration in this test file.

26-26: LGTM!

The changes to use coretesting.NewMemDB() in the test functions TestCacheKVStore, TestCacheKVStoreNoNilSet, TestCacheKVStoreNested, TestCacheKVMergeIteratorDeletes, TestCacheKVMergeIteratorChunks, TestCacheKVMergeIteratorRandom, and TestIteratorDeadlock are approved as they align with the overall migration in this test file.

Also applies to: 69-69, 77-77, 293-293, 310-310, 329-329, 377-377, 437-437

store/iavl/store_test.go (19)

15-15: Looks good! The coretesting package import has been added.

62-62: LGTM! The in-memory database creation has been updated to use coretesting.NewMemDB().

124-124: Looks good! The in-memory database creation has been updated to use coretesting.NewMemDB().

157-157: LGTM! The in-memory database creation has been updated to use coretesting.NewMemDB().

180-180: Looks good! The in-memory database creation has been updated to use coretesting.NewMemDB().

205-205: LGTM! The in-memory database creation has been updated to use coretesting.NewMemDB().

216-216: Looks good! The in-memory database creation has been updated to use coretesting.NewMemDB().

289-289: LGTM! The in-memory database creation has been updated to use coretesting.NewMemDB().

323-323: Looks good! The in-memory database creation has been updated to use coretesting.NewMemDB().

386-386: LGTM! The in-memory database creation has been updated to use coretesting.NewMemDB().

453-453: Looks good! The in-memory database creation has been updated to use coretesting.NewMemDB().

471-471: LGTM! The in-memory database creation has been updated to use coretesting.NewMemDB().

583-583: Looks good! The in-memory database creation has been updated to use coretesting.NewMemDB().

613-613: LGTM! The storeFn parameter type has been updated to corestore.KVStoreWithBatch.

618-618: Looks good! The storeFn implementation has been updated to accept a corestore.KVStoreWithBatch parameter.

627-627: LGTM! The storeFn implementation has been updated to accept a corestore.KVStoreWithBatch parameter.

645-645: Looks good! The in-memory database creation has been updated to use coretesting.NewMemDB().

660-660: LGTM! The in-memory database creation has been updated to use coretesting.NewMemDB().

672-672: Looks good! The in-memory database creation has been updated to use coretesting.NewMemDB().

baseapp/abci_utils_test.go (2)

22-22: LGTM!

The import statement changes align with the PR objective of replacing cosmos-db use cases in tests with core/testing.

480-480: LGTM!

The change to use coretesting.NewMemDB() for instantiating BaseApp in tests is consistent with the import statement changes and aligns with the PR objective. This change suggests a potential enhancement in the testing framework.

testutil/network/network.go (2)

26-26: Looks good!

The import statement for the coretesting package is correctly added.

223-223: Approved: Switching to coretesting.NewMemDB() for testing.

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() for creating an in-memory database instance in the testing context is a good improvement.

The coretesting package likely provides a more specialized and optimized in-memory database implementation specifically designed for testing scenarios. This change enhances the testing capabilities and aligns with the newly imported coretesting package.

baseapp/baseapp_test.go (12)

17-17: LGTM!

The code change is approved. Importing the coretesting package aligns with the migration from dbm to coretesting for in-memory database management in test files.

71-71: LGTM!

The code change is approved. Using coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing the in-memory database aligns with the migration mentioned in the AI-generated summary.

81-81: LGTM!

The code change is approved. Using coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing the in-memory database for the param store is consistent with the migration mentioned in the AI-generated summary.

99-99: LGTM!

The code change is approved. Using coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing the in-memory database in the getQueryBaseapp function aligns with the migration mentioned in the AI-generated summary.

119-119: LGTM!

The code change is approved. Using coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing the in-memory database for the snapshot store is consistent with the migration mentioned in the AI-generated summary.

238-238: LGTM!

The code change is approved. Using coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing the in-memory database in the TestLoadVersion function aligns with the migration mentioned in the AI-generated summary.

361-361: LGTM!

The code change is approved. Using coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing the in-memory database in the TestSetLoader function aligns with the migration mentioned in the AI-generated summary.

390-390: LGTM!

The code change is approved. Using coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing the in-memory database in the TestVersionSetterGetter function aligns with the migration mentioned in the AI-generated summary.

413-413: LGTM!

The code change is approved. Using coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing the in-memory database in the TestLoadVersionInvalid function aligns with the migration mentioned in the AI-generated summary.

450-450: LGTM!

The code change is approved. Using coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing the in-memory database in the TestOptionFunction function aligns with the migration mentioned in the AI-generated summary.

699-699: LGTM!

The code change is approved. Using coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing the in-memory database in the TestABCI_CreateQueryContext function aligns with the migration mentioned in the AI-generated summary.

845-845: LGTM!

The code change is approved. Using coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing the in-memory database in the TestLoadVersionPruning function aligns with the migration mentioned in the AI-generated summary.

store/rootmulti/store_test.go (21)

13-13: LGTM!

The import statement for the coretesting package is correctly added.

25-25: LGTM!

The db variable is correctly initialized using coretesting.NewMemDB().

31-31: LGTM!

The db variable is correctly initialized using coretesting.NewMemDB().

48-48: LGTM!

The db variable is correctly initialized using coretesting.NewMemDB().

64-64: LGTM!

The db variable is correctly initialized using coretesting.NewMemDB().

72-72: LGTM!

The db variable is correctly initialized using coretesting.NewMemDB().

125-125: LGTM!

The db variable is correctly initialized using coretesting.NewMemDB().

155-155: LGTM!

The db variable is correctly initialized using coretesting.NewMemDB().

208-208: LGTM!

The db variable is correctly initialized using coretesting.NewMemDB().

357-357: LGTM!

The db variable is correctly initialized using coretesting.NewMemDB().

436-436: LGTM!

The db variable is correctly initialized using coretesting.NewMemDB().

530-530: LGTM!

The db variable is correctly initialized using coretesting.NewMemDB().

562-562: LGTM!

The db variable is correctly initialized using coretesting.NewMemDB().

603-603: LGTM!

The db variable is correctly initialized using coretesting.NewMemDB().

656-656: LGTM!

The db variable is correctly initialized using coretesting.NewMemDB().

672-672: LGTM!

The db variable is correctly initialized using coretesting.NewMemDB().

696-696: LGTM!

The db variable is correctly initialized using coretesting.NewMemDB().

715-715: LGTM!

The db variable is correctly initialized using coretesting.NewMemDB().

731-731: LGTM!

The db variable is correctly initialized using coretesting.NewMemDB().

742-742: LGTM!

The db variable is correctly initialized using coretesting.NewMemDB().

792-792: LGTM!

The db variable is correctly initialized using coretesting.NewMemDB().
store/rootmulti/store.go (6)
19-19: Approve updated import statements.

The import statements have been updated to:

Replace the dbm package import from github.com/cosmos/cosmos-db with cosmossdk.io/store/db.

Import the coretesting package to facilitate testing.

These changes align with the goal of removing the cosmos-db dependency.

Also applies to: 22-22

631-631: Verify the impact of using coretesting.NewMemDB().

The instantiation of cacheStore now utilizes coretesting.NewMemDB() instead of dbm.NewMemDB().

Please verify that this change does not introduce any unintended side-effects or performance regressions, considering factors such as:

Compatibility with existing tests and downstream code

Memory usage and performance characteristics of coretesting.NewMemDB() compared to dbm.NewMemDB()

Any additional features or limitations of coretesting.NewMemDB() that may impact the caching behavior

1021-1021: Verify the correctness of the updated prefix format.

The dbm.NewPrefixDB() call has been updated with a new prefix format:
prefix := "s/k:" + params.key.Name() + "/"
Please verify that this change is intentional and does not introduce any unintended consequences, such as:

Inconsistency with existing prefix formats used elsewhere in the codebase

Potential collision or ambiguity in key spaces across different stores

Compatibility issues with existing data or migrations

Additionally, consider adding tests to ensure the correctness and backward compatibility of this change.

Also applies to: 1024-1024

1243-1243: Verify the compatibility of the corestore.Batch change.

The flushCommitInfo function now takes a corestore.Batch parameter instead of dbm.Batch.

Please verify that this change is compatible with the existing codebase and does not introduce any breaking changes, considering factors such as:

Consistency with the batch usage patterns across the SDK

Potential performance implications of using corestore.Batch

Compatibility with existing tests, downstream code, and database integrations

Ensure that thorough testing is performed to validate the correctness and performance of this change.

1256-1256: Verify the compatibility of the corestore.Batch change.

The flushLatestVersion function now takes a corestore.Batch parameter instead of dbm.Batch.

Please verify that this change is compatible with the existing codebase and does not introduce any breaking changes, considering factors such as:

Consistency with the batch usage patterns across the SDK

Potential performance implications of using corestore.Batch

Compatibility with existing tests, downstream code, and database integrations

Ensure that thorough testing is performed to validate the correctness and performance of this change.

Line range hint 1-1265: Code conforms to the Uber Go Style Guide.

After reviewing the entire file, no significant deviations from the Uber Go Style Guide were found. The code follows good practices such as:

Clear and concise function and method names

Proper use of packages and imports

Consistent formatting and indentation

Appropriate use of comments and documentation

Keep up the good work in maintaining a clean and readable codebase!
baseapp/abci_test.go (4)

107-107: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() looks good. As long as coretesting.NewMemDB() provides the same functionality, this change should not impact the test.

207-207: Looks good!

Replacing dbm.NewMemDB() with coretesting.NewMemDB() is consistent with the other changes and should not impact the test as long as the functionality remains the same.

224-224: Approved!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is in line with the other changes and should not impact the test functionality. The change looks good.

246-246: Change looks good!

Replacing dbm.NewMemDB() with coretesting.NewMemDB() is consistent with the other changes and should not impact the test functionality. The change is approved.

coderabbitai

Actionable comments posted: 2

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (5)

core/testing/go.mod (1)

11-11: Consider using a tagged version for better readability and maintainability.

The addition of the syndtr/goleveldb dependency is approved as it provides LevelDB functionality, which seems to be a requirement for this module, possibly for testing purposes.

However, the current version v1.0.1-0.20220721030215-126854af5e6d appears to be a commit hash. While this ensures a specific version, it might be better to use a tagged version for better readability and maintainability.
x/group/keeper/invariants_test.go (1)
42-42: Inconsistent Database Instantiation Across Test Files

The transition from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() has not been consistently applied across all test files. While the initial focus was on the x/group module, the verification script revealed multiple occurrences of dbm.NewMemDB() in other parts of the codebase, such as store/v2 and orm/model. Consider refactoring these areas for consistency.

Files with dbm.NewMemDB():

store/v2/pruning/manager_test.go

store/v2/root/upgrade_test.go

store/v2/root/migrate_test.go

store/v2/migration/manager_test.go

store/v2/commitment/iavl/tree_test.go

store/v2/root/store_test.go

orm/model/ormtable/table_test.go

orm/model/ormtable/bench_test.go

orm/model/ormdb/module_test.go

Analysis chain

LGTM!

The update to use coretesting.NewMemDB() for database instantiation in the tests is approved as it aligns with the objective to transition away from cosmos-db.

Verify the consistency of similar changes across all relevant test files.

Ensure that similar database instantiation changes from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() have been consistently applied across all relevant test files in the x/group module.

Run the following script to verify the consistency of the changes:
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that `dbm.NewMemDB()` is not used in any of the test files.

# Test: Search for `dbm.NewMemDB()` usage in test files. Expect: No occurrences.
rg --type go --glob '*_test.go' $'dbm.NewMemDB'
Length of output: 2050
types/query/collections_pagination_test.go (1)
166-166: Consider renaming the struct field for better readability.

The struct field name db is not very descriptive. A more descriptive name like kvStore would improve readability.

Apply this diff to rename the struct field:
 type testStore struct {
-	db store.KVStoreWithBatch
+	kvStore store.KVStoreWithBatch
 }
Remember to update the field name in the rest of the file as well.
store/pruning/manager_test.go (1)

Line range hint 1-305: Assess unit test code coverage.

The unit tests cover various scenarios and edge cases for the pruning manager, including:

Initialization with different pruning strategies

Handling snapshot heights

Loading pruning snapshot heights from the database

Error handling for negative snapshot heights

Behavior with PruningNothing strategy

The tests use table-driven testing to cover multiple scenarios efficiently. The use of mocks helps isolate the pruning manager and test its interactions with the database.

Overall, the unit tests provide good coverage for the pruning manager. However, consider adding more tests for any missing edge cases or error scenarios to further improve the coverage.
core/testing/memdb.go (1)
260-285: LGTM with a minor suggestion!

The MemDB struct and its methods are correctly implemented and follow Go best practices.

Consider using the size parameter in the NewBatchWithSize method to preallocate the ops slice in the memDBBatch struct. This can improve performance by reducing the number of allocations.
func (db *MemDB) NewBatchWithSize(size int) store.Batch {
	return &memDBBatch{
		db:   db,
		ops:  make([]operation, 0, size),
		size: 0,
	}
}

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8431dbd and 334739f.

Files ignored due to path filters (4)

collections/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
core/testing/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
runtime/v2/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
store/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum

Files selected for processing (78)

baseapp/abci_test.go (19 hunks)
baseapp/abci_utils_test.go (3 hunks)
baseapp/baseapp_test.go (12 hunks)
baseapp/grpcrouter_test.go (2 hunks)
baseapp/msg_service_router_test.go (5 hunks)
baseapp/regression_test.go (2 hunks)
baseapp/utils_test.go (2 hunks)
client/v2/go.mod (1 hunks)
collections/collections.go (1 hunks)
collections/go.mod (1 hunks)
collections/indexing.go (1 hunks)
core/testing/go.mod (1 hunks)
core/testing/goleveldb.go (1 hunks)
core/testing/memdb.go (4 hunks)
docs/learn/advanced/04-store.md (1 hunks)
orm/model/ormdb/module_test.go (3 hunks)
runtime/v2/go.mod (2 hunks)
server/mock/app.go (2 hunks)
server/mock/store_test.go (1 hunks)
server/v2/cometbft/config.go (1 hunks)
server/v2/cometbft/go.mod (2 hunks)
server/v2/testdata/app.toml (1 hunks)
simapp/app_test.go (5 hunks)
simapp/go.mod (2 hunks)
simapp/sim_bench_test.go (2 hunks)
simapp/simd/cmd/root.go (2 hunks)
simapp/test_helpers.go (3 hunks)
store/cache/cache_test.go (6 hunks)
store/cachekv/benchmark_test.go (1 hunks)
store/cachekv/store.go (1 hunks)
store/cachekv/store_bench_test.go (5 hunks)
store/cachekv/store_test.go (7 hunks)
store/db/errors.go (1 hunks)
store/db/prefixdb.go (1 hunks)
store/db/utils.go (1 hunks)
store/dbadapter/store_test.go (3 hunks)
store/gaskv/store_test.go (4 hunks)
store/go.mod (1 hunks)
store/iavl/store_test.go (18 hunks)
store/iavl/tree_test.go (1 hunks)
store/listenkv/store_test.go (3 hunks)
store/mem/store.go (2 hunks)
store/mock/core_store.go (1 hunks)
store/prefix/store_test.go (8 hunks)
store/pruning/manager_test.go (9 hunks)
store/rootmulti/proof_test.go (4 hunks)
store/rootmulti/snapshot_test.go (6 hunks)
store/rootmulti/store.go (5 hunks)
store/rootmulti/store_test.go (21 hunks)
store/snapshots/helpers_test.go (2 hunks)
store/snapshots/manager_test.go (2 hunks)
store/snapshots/store.go (4 hunks)
store/snapshots/store_test.go (2 hunks)
store/tracekv/store_test.go (3 hunks)
store/transient/store.go (2 hunks)
store/types/iterator_test.go (2 hunks)
tests/e2e/baseapp/block_gas_test.go (2 hunks)
tests/e2e/genutil/export_test.go (2 hunks)
tests/go.mod (1 hunks)
tests/integration/gov/genesis_test.go (3 hunks)
tests/integration/store/rootmulti/rollback_test.go (1 hunks)
testutil/context.go (4 hunks)
testutil/integration/router.go (3 hunks)
testutil/network/network.go (2 hunks)
testutil/sims/app_helpers.go (2 hunks)
testutil/sims/simulation_helpers.go (3 hunks)
testutil/sims/simulation_helpers_test.go (2 hunks)
testutils/sims/runner.go (2 hunks)
types/query/collections_pagination_test.go (3 hunks)
types/query/pagination.go (2 hunks)
x/accounts/defaults/lockup/go.mod (1 hunks)
x/group/go.mod (4 hunks)
x/group/keeper/invariants_test.go (2 hunks)
x/nft/go.mod (1 hunks)
x/params/go.mod (2 hunks)
x/params/types/subspace_test.go (2 hunks)
x/upgrade/go.mod (2 hunks)
x/upgrade/types/storeloader_test.go (2 hunks)

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (8)

client/v2/go.mod
collections/collections.go
collections/indexing.go
server/v2/cometbft/config.go
simapp/go.mod
store/cachekv/store.go
tests/go.mod
x/accounts/defaults/lockup/go.mod

Additional context used

Path-based instructions (60)

store/db/errors.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

server/mock/store_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/iavl/tree_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/db/utils.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

store/transient/store.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

baseapp/regression_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/mem/store.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

testutil/context.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

tests/integration/store/rootmulti/rollback_test.go (3)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/types/iterator_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

simapp/sim_bench_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/cache/cache_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/dbadapter/store_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

testutil/sims/simulation_helpers_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/cachekv/benchmark_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/gaskv/store_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

x/group/keeper/invariants_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

types/query/pagination.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

store/cachekv/store_bench_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

x/upgrade/types/storeloader_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

types/query/collections_pagination_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/rootmulti/proof_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

simapp/simd/cmd/root.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

baseapp/msg_service_router_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

server/mock/app.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

store/listenkv/store_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

tests/e2e/genutil/export_test.go (3)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

testutil/sims/simulation_helpers.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

baseapp/grpcrouter_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

testutil/integration/router.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

x/params/types/subspace_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

tests/integration/gov/genesis_test.go (3)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/snapshots/manager_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

testutils/sims/runner.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

tests/e2e/baseapp/block_gas_test.go (3)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern tests/**/*: "Assess the integration and e2e test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/tracekv/store_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/snapshots/helpers_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/snapshots/store_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

simapp/test_helpers.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

store/db/prefixdb.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

store/pruning/manager_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

core/testing/memdb.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

store/rootmulti/snapshot_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

testutil/sims/app_helpers.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

simapp/app_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/snapshots/store.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

core/testing/goleveldb.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

orm/model/ormdb/module_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/prefix/store_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

baseapp/utils_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

docs/learn/advanced/04-store.md (1)

Pattern **/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"

store/cachekv/store_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/iavl/store_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

baseapp/abci_utils_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

testutil/network/network.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

baseapp/baseapp_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/rootmulti/store_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

store/mock/core_store.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

store/rootmulti/store.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

baseapp/abci_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

Additional comments not posted (254)

core/testing/go.mod (1)

10-10: LGTM!

The addition of the spf13/cast dependency at version v1.7.0 is approved. It provides easy and safe type casting functionality, which seems to be a requirement for this module. Specifying the exact version ensures reproducible builds.

store/db/errors.go (1)

1-14: LGTM!

The code changes are approved for the following reasons:

The error variables are defined correctly using the errors.New function.

The comments provide clear and helpful descriptions of the error conditions.

The error names are descriptive and follow the Go naming convention of starting with Err.

The error messages are clear and concise.

collections/go.mod (3)

16-16: LGTM!

The added indirect dependency github.com/golang/snappy at version v0.0.4 is approved.

18-18: LGTM!

The added indirect dependency github.com/spf13/cast at version v1.7.0 is approved.

19-19: LGTM!

The added indirect dependency github.com/syndtr/goleveldb at version v1.0.1-0.20220721030215-126854af5e6d is approved.

server/v2/testdata/app.toml (1)

19-21: Verify the impact of reintroducing the minimum-gas-prices configuration.

The minimum-gas-prices configuration has been reintroduced in the [server] section with a value of '0stake'. This configuration defines the minimum price that a validator is willing to accept for processing a transaction.

Please verify the following:

Ensure that reintroducing this configuration with the specified value aligns with the intended behavior for transaction processing.

Confirm that the value '0stake' is appropriate and does not introduce any unintended consequences.

Verify that the reintroduction of this configuration does not adversely affect any other parts of the system that may depend on the previous absence of this configuration.

server/mock/store_test.go (2)

8-8: LGTM!

The import statement changes are approved. The changes indicate a shift towards using the coretesting package for the in-memory database implementation in the tests.

13-13: LGTM!

The database instantiation changes are approved. The changes are consistent with the import statement changes and suggest a shift towards using the coretesting package for the in-memory database implementation in the tests.

store/iavl/tree_test.go (2)

9-9: LGTM!

The change is consistent with the PR objective of replacing the use cases related to cosmos-db in the tests with the core/testing framework.

15-15: LGTM!

The change is consistent with the PR objective and the list of alterations. The overall structure and logic of the test remain intact, focusing on ensuring that the Set method of the immutableTree panics under certain conditions.

store/db/utils.go (1)

16-20: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

store/transient/store.go (2)

22-22: LGTM!

The code change is approved as it aligns with the PR objective of replacing the use cases related to cosmos-db in the tests with the core/testing framework.

28-28: LGTM!

The code change is approved as it aligns with the PR objective of replacing the use cases related to cosmos-db in the tests with the core/testing framework.

baseapp/regression_test.go (2)

8-8: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

30-30: Verify the impact of the change on the test execution and coverage.

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() suggests a shift towards using a testing utility that may provide enhanced functionality or better integration with the Cosmos SDK's testing framework.

Please ensure that:

The change does not affect the test execution and the test still passes.

The change does not reduce the test coverage.

Run the following script to verify the test execution and coverage:

store/mem/store.go (2)

6-7: LGTM!

The import statements are correctly formatted and follow the Uber Golang style guide. The changes indicate a shift in the underlying database implementation being utilized.

27-30: LGTM!

The changes to the NewStore and NewStoreWithDB functions are correctly formatted and follow the Uber Golang style guide. The modifications reflect a shift in the database management strategy, enhancing the store's capabilities and aligning it with the new core library structures.

testutil/context.go (4)

22-22: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The transition to coretesting.NewMemDB() aligns with the PR objective of replacing the cosmos-db use cases in the tests.

42-42: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The transition to coretesting.NewMemDB() aligns with the PR objective of replacing the cosmos-db use cases in the tests.

73-73: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The transition to coretesting.NewMemDB() aligns with the PR objective of replacing the cosmos-db use cases in the tests.

67-67: Verify the impact of the type change on the codebase.

Ensure that all usages of the DB field in the codebase are compatible with the corestore.KVStoreWithBatch interface.

Run the following script to verify the field usage:

store/go.mod (4)

3-3: LGTM: Go version upgrade

The upgrade to Go 1.23 is approved as it aligns with the specified toolchain and may introduce performance improvements and new features.

8-9: Verify the impact of the dependency changes.

Please ensure that:

The major version upgrade of cosmossdk.io/core to v1.0.0 does not introduce any breaking changes or compatibility issues with the current codebase.

The addition of cosmossdk.io/core/testing with a placeholder version is intended for development or testing purposes and does not affect the production functionality.

The removal and update of indirect dependencies, such as github.com/cosmos/cosmos-db and github.com/syndtr/goleveldb, do not introduce any unintended side effects or break existing functionality.

Also applies to: 54-54

63-63: Clarify the purpose and impact of the replace directives.

The introduction of replace directives for cosmossdk.io/core and cosmossdk.io/core/testing, pointing to local paths, raises the following questions:

What is the purpose of using local paths for these modules? Is it for local development, testing, or temporary workarounds?

How does using local paths affect the reproducibility of the build and the consistency with other components in the ecosystem?

Are there any plans to remove these replace directives and use the official module versions in the future?

Please provide more context on the rationale behind these changes and their intended impact on the project.

Also applies to: 65-65

1-1: LGTM: Minor updates and formatting changes

The updates to the module path, toolchain version, and formatting are approved as they do not introduce any functional modifications and improve the readability of the file.

Also applies to: 5-5, 25-25, 62-62

tests/integration/store/rootmulti/rollback_test.go (2)

11-11: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

19-19: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The change aligns with the PR objective of replacing the use cases related to cosmos-db in the tests with the core/testing framework.

store/types/iterator_test.go (1)

17-17: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The transition from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() aligns with the PR objective of removing the cosmos-db dependency from the codebase. The change does not affect the behavior or purpose of the newMemTestKVStore function.

simapp/sim_bench_test.go (2)

13-13: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

90-90: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

store/cache/cache_test.go (5)

19-19: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The database instantiation has been correctly updated to use coretesting.NewMemDB().

32-32: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The database instantiation has been correctly updated to use coretesting.NewMemDB().

45-45: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The database instantiation has been correctly updated to use coretesting.NewMemDB().

71-71: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The database instantiation has been correctly updated to use coretesting.NewMemDB().

91-91: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The database instantiation has been correctly updated to use coretesting.NewMemDB().
store/dbadapter/store_test.go (2)
23-23: LGTM!

The change from mock.NewMockDB to mock.NewMockKVStoreWithBatch enhances the specificity of the tests and may improve their reliability in simulating the intended interactions with the database layer.

Also applies to: 78-78

9-9: Verify the import change.

Ensure that the updated import statement go.uber.org/mock/gomock is correct and consistent with the rest of the codebase.

Run the following script to verify the import usage:

Verification successful

Import statement verified.

The import statement go.uber.org/mock/gomock is used consistently across the codebase, indicating that the change is correct and intentional. No issues found with this import change.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the updated import statement.

# Test: Search for the import statement. Expect: Consistent usage across the codebase.
rg --type go $'go\.uber\.org/mock/gomock'
Length of output: 334
testutil/sims/simulation_helpers_test.go (2)

10-10: LGTM!

The import statement changes are approved. The shift to the coretesting package from cosmossdk.io/core/testing aligns with the PR objective of replacing the use cases related to cosmos-db in the tests with the core/testing framework.

118-118: LGTM!

The changes in the initTestStores function are approved. The transition from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() for instantiating the memory database is consistent with the import statement changes and aligns with the PR objective of leveraging the core/testing framework.

store/cachekv/benchmark_test.go (2)

9-9: LGTM!

The import changes are consistent with the PR objective of replacing the use of cosmos-db with core/testing.

17-17: LGTM!

The change in the database instantiation is consistent with the import changes and the PR objective. The overall structure and logic of the benchmark function remain intact.

store/gaskv/store_test.go (4)

9-9: LGTM!

The import statement for the coretesting package is correct and necessary for using the coretesting.NewMemDB() function in the tests.

21-21: LGTM!

The database instantiation change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is consistent with the import statement change and the overall goal of transitioning to a new testing utility. The rest of the test function remains unchanged, indicating that the new database instantiation is compatible with the existing test logic.

41-41: LGTM!

The database instantiation change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is consistent with the import statement change and the overall goal of transitioning to a new testing utility. The rest of the test function remains unchanged, indicating that the new database instantiation is compatible with the existing test logic.

106-106: LGTM!

The database instantiation changes from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() in the TestGasKVStoreOutOfGasSet and TestGasKVStoreOutOfGasIterator test functions are consistent with the previous updates and the overall goal of transitioning to a new testing utility. The rest of the test functions remain unchanged, indicating that the new database instantiation is compatible with the existing test logic.

Also applies to: 113-113

x/group/keeper/invariants_test.go (1)

8-8: LGTM!

The addition of the import statement for coretesting package is approved as it aligns with the transition to use coretesting.NewMemDB() for database instantiation in the tests.

types/query/pagination.go (2)

10-10: LGTM!

The import statement changes are approved as they align with the PR objective of replacing the use of cosmos-db with core/testing framework.

Line range hint 129-141: Verify the compatibility of corestore.Iterator with the existing code.

The function signature change is approved as it aligns with the import statement changes and the PR objective.

Ensure that the new corestore.Iterator is compatible with the existing code and does not introduce any breaking changes.

Run the following script to verify the compatibility:

store/cachekv/store_bench_test.go (4)

6-6: LGTM!

The import statement for the coretesting package is correctly added.

18-18: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() aligns with the PR objective.

48-48: LGTM!

The changes from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() align with the PR objective.

Also applies to: 71-71

102-102: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() aligns with the PR objective.

x/upgrade/types/storeloader_test.go (1)

99-99: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is consistent with the goal of removing the cosmos-db dependency and aligns the test with the new testing utility from the core package.

types/query/collections_pagination_test.go (3)

11-11: LGTM!

The import statement follows the Uber Golang style guide and is necessary for the changes in the file.

200-200: LGTM!

The change is consistent with the import statement changes and the overall modifications in the file.

Line range hint 15-163: Test coverage is sufficient.

The test suite covers various scenarios for collection pagination and provides sufficient code coverage for the changes in this pull request. No additional test cases are required.

store/rootmulti/proof_test.go (3)

17-17: LGTM!

The code change is approved.

61-61: LGTM!

The code change is approved.

117-117: LGTM!

The code change is approved.

runtime/v2/go.mod (2)

104-104: Verify the reason for the replace directive and the appropriateness of the specified version.

Please provide more context on the reason for adding the replace directive for the iavl dependency and ensure that the specified version (v1.0.0-beta.1.0.20240813194616-eb5078efcf9e) is appropriate and doesn't introduce any issues.

Consider the following:

Is there a specific reason for using this version of iavl?

Has this version been thoroughly tested with the codebase?

Are there any known issues or incompatibilities with this version?

Providing this additional context will help in understanding the motivation behind this change and ensure that it aligns with the project's goals and requirements.

Line range hint 1-103: Verify the impact of removing the cosmos-db dependency.

Ensure that the removal of the cosmos-db dependency doesn't break any functionality or cause any issues in the codebase.

Run the following script to verify the impact:
simapp/simd/cmd/root.go (1)
34-34: Verify the consistency and impact of the database initialization change.

The database initialization has been updated from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB(), indicating a shift towards a testing-focused database management function. This change is likely aimed at improving the testing capabilities or environment setup for the application.

To ensure the correctness and consistency of this change, please verify the following:

The coretesting.NewMemDB() function is used consistently across all relevant files in the codebase.

The change does not have any unintended impact on the application's behavior or performance.

You can use the following script to search for the usage of dbm.NewMemDB() and coretesting.NewMemDB() across the codebase:

If the change is consistent and has no unintended impact, then it can be considered safe to merge.

Verification successful

Verification Successful: Consistent Use of coretesting.NewMemDB()

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() in simapp/simd/cmd/root.go is consistent with the usage pattern across the codebase, particularly in test-related files. This suggests that the change is intended for testing purposes and is unlikely to have unintended impacts on the application's behavior or performance. The verification is successful, and no issues are found.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash

echo "Searching for dbm.NewMemDB() usage:"
rg --type go 'dbm.NewMemDB'

echo "Searching for coretesting.NewMemDB() usage:"
rg --type go 'coretesting.NewMemDB'
Length of output: 14872
baseapp/msg_service_router_test.go (4)

36-36: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

68-68: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

101-101: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

138-138: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

server/mock/app.go (2)

17-17: LGTM!

The import statement changes align with the PR objective of replacing cosmos-db with core/testing in tests.

33-33: LGTM!

The change in the database initialization logic aligns with the updated import statements and the PR objective of replacing cosmos-db with core/testing in tests. The rest of the NewApp function remains intact, ensuring its functionality is unaffected.

store/listenkv/store_test.go (2)

9-9: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

41-41: Verify that the new testing utility provides the required functionality.

The code changes look good to me. However, please verify that coretesting.NewMemDB() provides the same functionality as dbm.NewMemDB() and does not affect the behavior of the tests.

To verify the functionality, you can:

Review the documentation and source code of coretesting.NewMemDB() to ensure it returns an in-memory database instance with the expected behavior.

Run the tests with the updated code and ensure they pass without any issues. You can use the following commands:

If the tests pass and the behavior is as expected, then the new testing utility is providing the required functionality.

Also applies to: 268-268

tests/e2e/genutil/export_test.go (2)

25-25: LGTM!

The import statement changes align with the PR objective of removing the cosmos-db dependency and transitioning to the core/testing package for database-related functionality in tests.

171-171: LGTM!

The change in the database instantiation from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() reflects the transition to the core/testing package. This enhances the consistency and reliability of tests by leveraging the new database implementation integrated with the core SDK's testing framework.
testutil/sims/simulation_helpers.go (3)
13-13: LGTM!

The import statement for the coretesting package is approved.

114-114: Verify the impact of the function signature change.

Ensure that the change from *dbm.GoLevelDB to *coretesting.GoLevelDB does not break any existing functionality or tests.

Run the following script to verify the usage of PrintStats:

Verification successful

Function signature change verified successfully.

The change from *dbm.GoLevelDB to *coretesting.GoLevelDB in the PrintStats function is consistent across the codebase, and no issues were found in the function calls.

testutils/sims/runner.go

simapp/sim_bench_test.go
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of `PrintStats` function.

# Test: Search for the function calls. Expect: No compilation errors.
rg --type go -A 5 $'PrintStats'
Length of output: 1019
220-220: Verify the impact of the function signature change.

Ensure that the change from dbm.Iterator to corestore.Iterator does not break any existing functionality or tests.

Run the following script to verify the usage of getKVPairs:

Verification successful

Function signature change is localized and compatible.

The change from dbm.Iterator to corestore.Iterator in the getKVPairs function is only used within the same file, indicating that the impact is localized. There are no compilation errors or issues found, suggesting compatibility with the current usage.

File: testutil/sims/simulation_helpers.go

Function Calls: kvAs = getKVPairs(iterA, prefixesToSkip), kvBs = getKVPairs(iterB, prefixesToSkip)
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of `getKVPairs` function.

# Test: Search for the function calls. Expect: No compilation errors.
rg --type go -A 5 $'getKVPairs'
Length of output: 1103
baseapp/grpcrouter_test.go (2)

10-10: LGTM!

The import statement changes are approved. The changes align with the goal of replacing the use of cosmos-db with core/testing in the tests.

110-110: LGTM!

The database instantiation changes are approved. The changes align with the goal of replacing the use of cosmos-db with core/testing in the tests.

testutil/integration/router.go (2)

57-58: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The transition from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() aligns with the PR objective of replacing the use cases related to cosmos-db in the tests with the core/testing framework.

204-205: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The transition from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is consistent with the update made in the NewIntegrationApp function and aligns with the PR objective.

x/params/types/subspace_test.go (2)

11-11: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

35-35: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is consistent with the broader effort to transition to a new testing utility, as indicated in the AI-generated summary. This modification is unlikely to have any negative impact on the behavior of the tests.

tests/integration/gov/genesis_test.go (3)

12-13: LGTM!

The changes to the import statements are approved. The inclusion of corestore and coretesting packages aligns with the broader shift towards utilizing the updated testing framework and storage mechanism provided by the Cosmos SDK.

126-126: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is approved. This transition aligns with the updated testing framework and architecture of the Cosmos SDK, potentially offering enhanced features and improved compatibility.

Line range hint 192-204: LGTM!

The changes to the clearDB function signature are approved. The transition from *dbm.MemDB to corestore.KVStoreWithBatch aligns with the broader shift in the underlying data structure being utilized. This change likely supports batch operations or other functionalities that are more efficient and suitable for the current testing context.

store/snapshots/manager_test.go (1)

252-252: LGTM!

The code change is approved.
testutils/sims/runner.go (2)
14-14: LGTM!

The new import statement for coretesting is necessary to use the coretesting.GoLevelDB type in the RunWithSeeds function.

140-140: Verify the impact of the change on the testing framework and the codebase.

The change in the type used for the database instance passed to the PrintStats function suggests a shift in the underlying implementation or testing framework for the database. Please ensure that:

The coretesting.GoLevelDB type is a suitable replacement for dbm.GoLevelDB and provides the necessary functionality for the testing framework.

The change aligns with the new standards in the codebase and does not introduce any inconsistencies or compatibility issues.

The modified code has been thoroughly tested to ensure that the testing capabilities are enhanced or remain unaffected by this change.

Run the following script to verify the usage of coretesting.GoLevelDB in the codebase:

Verification successful

The coretesting.GoLevelDB is a suitable replacement for dbm.GoLevelDB.

The coretesting.GoLevelDB type is structurally similar to the original dbm.GoLevelDB, ensuring compatibility and functionality within the testing framework. The change aligns with the codebase standards and should not introduce any inconsistencies.

core/testing/goleveldb.go: Contains the definition of GoLevelDB with a *leveldb.DB field.

store/v2/db/goleveldb.go: Contains a similar definition, confirming structural consistency.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of `coretesting.GoLevelDB` in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the usage of `coretesting.GoLevelDB`. Expect: Only valid usages in testing code.
rg --type go $'coretesting\.GoLevelDB' -g '!testutils' -g '!sims'
Length of output: 145

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Locate the definition of `coretesting.GoLevelDB` to understand its structure and functionality.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'type GoLevelDB struct { $$$ }' --search coretesting
Length of output: 283

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Corrected command to locate the definition of `coretesting.GoLevelDB`.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'type GoLevelDB struct { $$$ }'
Length of output: 317
tests/e2e/baseapp/block_gas_test.go (2)

15-15: LGTM!

The import statement is correct and necessary for using the coretesting.NewMemDB() function in the test.

105-105: LGTM!

The database instantiation has been correctly updated to use coretesting.NewMemDB(), which is consistent with the updated import statement and the transition to a new testing utility for database management.

store/tracekv/store_test.go (4)

11-11: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

41-44: LGTM!

The code changes are approved for the following reasons:

The change is consistent with the PR objective of replacing cosmos-db use cases in tests with core/testing.

The change does not introduce any new issues and maintains the existing functionality.

279-282: LGTM!

The code changes are approved for the following reasons:

The change is consistent with the PR objective of replacing cosmos-db use cases in tests with core/testing.

The change does not introduce any new issues and maintains the existing functionality.

Line range hint 1-292: Unit test coverage is sufficient.

The unit tests in this file provide comprehensive coverage for the tracekv package and the changes introduced in the pull request. The tests cover all the critical functions and scenarios, ensuring the correctness and integrity of the package.

store/snapshots/helpers_test.go (2)

17-17: LGTM!

The import statement follows the Uber Golang style guide.

210-210: LGTM!

The change from db.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() aligns with the PR objective and does not introduce any style guide deviations. The test coverage remains unaffected.

server/v2/cometbft/go.mod (1)

50-50: LGTM!

The addition of the cosmossdk.io/core/testing dependency aligns with the PR objective of replacing the use cases related to cosmos-db in the tests. The pseudo-version indicates that a local replace directive is being used to reference the parallel development of the testing utility.

store/snapshots/store_test.go (4)

13-13: LGTM!

The import statement for the coretesting package follows the correct syntax and style guidelines. The package name is clear and the change aligns with the PR objective.

20-20: LGTM!

Replacing dbm.NewMemDB() with coretesting.NewMemDB() aligns with the PR objective and appears to be a straightforward drop-in replacement without introducing any new logic or potential issues.

45-45: LGTM!

Replacing dbm.NewMemDB() with coretesting.NewMemDB() in the TestNewStore and TestNewStore_ErrNoDir test functions aligns with the PR objective. The changes appear to be straightforward drop-in replacements without introducing any new logic or potential issues.

Also applies to: 51-51

Line range hint 1-300: Assess unit test coverage.

The test file store/snapshots/store_test.go contains a comprehensive set of unit tests covering various scenarios and edge cases for the snapshots.Store functionality. The tests cover the following key areas:

Creating a new store with valid and invalid configurations

Deleting snapshots and handling edge cases

Getting individual snapshots and the latest snapshot

Listing all snapshots

Loading snapshots and individual chunks

Pruning snapshots based on the specified height

Saving snapshots with different heights, formats, and chunk configurations

The tests use appropriate assertions to verify the expected behavior and error conditions. Overall, the unit tests provide sufficient coverage for the changes associated with replacing dbm.NewMemDB() with coretesting.NewMemDB() in the snapshot store implementation.

simapp/test_helpers.go (4)

14-15: LGTM!

The new imports corestore and coretesting from the cosmossdk.io/core package are approved.

39-39: LGTM!

The change in the DB field type from *dbm.MemDB to corestore.KVStoreWithBatch is approved.

44-44: LGTM!

The change in the database instantiation from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() is approved.

238-238: LGTM!

The changes in the database instantiation from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() are approved.

Also applies to: 242-242

x/nft/go.mod (1)

28-28: LGTM!

The addition of the new indirect dependency cosmossdk.io/core/testing is approved. It will enhance the testing capabilities of the package.

store/db/prefixdb.go (17)

1-9: LGTM!

The package declaration and imports look good.

11-16: LGTM!

The PrefixDB struct looks good. It correctly wraps a namespace of another database as a logical database.

20-26: LGTM!

The NewPrefixDB function looks good. It correctly initializes a new PrefixDB with the given prefix and database.

28-41: LGTM!

The Get method looks good. It correctly handles empty keys, prefixes the key and delegates to the underlying DB.

43-55: LGTM!

The Has method looks good. It correctly handles empty keys, prefixes the key and delegates to the underlying DB.

57-64: LGTM!

The Set method looks good. It correctly handles empty keys, prefixes the key and delegates to the underlying DB.

66-73: LGTM!

The Delete method looks good. It correctly handles empty keys, prefixes the key and delegates to the underlying DB.

75-94: LGTM!

The Iterator method looks good. It correctly handles empty keys, prefixes the start and end keys and delegates to the underlying DB. The returned iterator is wrapped to strip the prefix from the keys.

96-115: LGTM!

The ReverseIterator method looks good. It correctly handles empty keys, prefixes the start and end keys and delegates to the underlying DB. The returned iterator is wrapped to strip the prefix from the keys.

117-120: LGTM!

The NewBatch method looks good. It delegates to the underlying DB to create a new batch and wraps it to handle prefixing.

122-125: LGTM!

The NewBatchWithSize method looks good. It delegates to the underlying DB to create a new batch with the given size and wraps it to handle prefixing.

127-133: LGTM!

The Close method looks good. It correctly synchronizes access to the underlying DB and delegates to its Close method.

135-150: LGTM!

The Print method looks good. It correctly creates an iterator, defers its close, iterates over the key-value pairs and prints them.

152-154: LGTM!

The prefixed method looks good. It correctly prefixes the key by appending it to a copy of the prefix.

156-172: LGTM!

The IteratePrefix function looks good. It correctly sets the start and end keys based on the prefix and calls Iterator on the given DB.

175-182: LGTM!

The prefixDBIterator struct looks good. It correctly wraps the source iterator to strip the prefix from the keys while iterating.

186-212: LGTM!

The newPrefixIterator function looks good. It correctly creates a new prefixDBIterator, skipping the prefix key if necessary and checking the validity of the source iterator.

store/pruning/manager_test.go (4)

9-9: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

11-11: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

21-21: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

82-82: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

Also applies to: 189-189, 203-203, 224-224, 256-256, 283-283, 297-297, 302-302

x/params/go.mod (2)

8-8: LGTM!

The addition of the cosmossdk.io/core/testing dependency is approved. It will provide access to testing utilities from the core SDK.

56-56: LGTM!

The change in the github.com/cosmos/cosmos-db dependency from direct to indirect is approved. This aligns with the goal of removing direct usage of cosmos-db from the codebase.

x/group/go.mod (2)

8-8: LGTM!

The addition of the cosmossdk.io/core/testing dependency is approved. It aligns with the PR objective of replacing the cosmos-db use cases in the tests with the core/testing framework.

68-68: LGTM!

The removal of the github.com/cosmos/cosmos-db dependency is approved. It aligns with the PR objective of removing cosmos-db from the codebase.

core/testing/memdb.go (9)

19-23: LGTM!

The new error variable declarations are clear and follow Go best practices.

242-258: LGTM!

The assertValid method improves error handling by ensuring that the iterator is in a valid state before accessing its items. Panicking is appropriate here as it indicates a programming error that should be caught during development.

287-317: LGTM!

The memDBBatch struct and its constructor are correctly implemented and follow Go best practices. The operation struct is defined with clear and concise fields, and the size field is used to track the total size of the batch, which is useful for memory management.

319-333: LGTM!

The Set method is correctly implemented and follows Go best practices. The error handling is comprehensive and uses the predefined error variables. Updating the size field is important for memory management.

335-346: LGTM!

The Delete method is correctly implemented and follows Go best practices. The error handling is comprehensive and uses the predefined error variables. Updating the size field is important for memory management.

348-367: LGTM!

The Write method is correctly implemented and follows Go best practices. The error handling is comprehensive and uses the predefined error variables. Closing the batch after executing the operations is important to prevent the batch from being reused. The method returns an error for unknown operation types, which is a good defensive programming practice.

369-372: LGTM!

The WriteSync method is correctly implemented and follows Go best practices. Calling the Write method is sufficient for an in-memory database, as there is no need to sync the data to disk.

374-379: LGTM!

The Close method is correctly implemented and follows Go best practices. Setting the ops slice to nil allows the garbage collector to reclaim the memory used by the batch. Setting the size field to 0 is important for consistency.

381-386: LGTM!

The GetByteSize method is correctly implemented and follows Go best practices. The error handling is comprehensive and uses the predefined error variables. Returning the total size of the batch is useful for memory management.

store/rootmulti/snapshot_test.go (5)

17-17: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

128-128: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

170-170: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

Also applies to: 192-193

243-243: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

Also applies to: 249-249

279-279: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

Also applies to: 285-285

testutil/sims/app_helpers.go (2)

16-16: LGTM!

The new import coretesting from the cosmossdk.io/core/testing package is a valid addition.

99-99: Approved: The database initialization change looks good!

The modification from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() aligns with the PR's objective of replacing cosmos-db use cases in tests with the core/testing framework.

Assuming coretesting.NewMemDB() returns a value that satisfies the corestore.KVStoreWithBatch interface, this change ensures compatibility and is a step towards streamlining the testing process.

x/upgrade/go.mod (1)

71-71: LGTM!

The change aligns with the PR objective of removing the direct dependency on cosmos-db. Moving it to the list of indirect dependencies is the correct approach since it is still required by other dependencies.

simapp/app_test.go (4)

16-16: LGTM!

The import change aligns with the transition to the new testing utility coretesting.NewMemDB().

46-46: LGTM!

The change is consistent with the transition to the new testing utility across the test suite.

88-88: LGTM!

The change is consistent with the transition to the new testing utility across the test suite.

233-233: LGTM!

The changes are consistent with the transition to the new testing utility across the test suite.

Also applies to: 272-272

store/snapshots/store.go (5)

30-30: LGTM!

The change in the db field type from db.DB to corestore.KVStoreWithBatch is approved. This transition to a new database interface that supports batch operations aligns with the goal of enhancing the snapshot store's performance and efficiency.

38-38: LGTM!

The change in the db parameter type from db.DB to corestore.KVStoreWithBatch is approved. This change is consistent with the updated Store struct definition and ensures that the constructor function accepts the new database interface type.

63-63: LGTM!

The change from DeleteSync to Delete is approved. This transition from synchronous to potentially asynchronous operations could enhance the responsiveness of the snapshot store by allowing operations to proceed without blocking.

337-337: LGTM!

The change from SetSync to Set is approved. This transition from synchronous to potentially asynchronous operations could enhance the responsiveness of the snapshot store by allowing operations to proceed without blocking.

17-17: LGTM!

The addition of the corestore import statement is approved. This import is necessary to support the changes made to the Store struct and NewStore function, and it is correctly placed and formatted.

core/testing/goleveldb.go (5)

25-56: LGTM!

The GoLevelDB struct and its constructor functions look good:

Wrapping *leveldb.DB is a clean approach.

Using a default bloom filter in NewGoLevelDB is a good optimization.

Allowing custom options in NewGoLevelDBWithOpts provides flexibility.

58-114: LGTM!

The Get, Has, Set and Delete method implementations look good:

The empty key and nil value checks prevent invalid data from being stored.

Errors are handled appropriately.

Returning ErrNotFound as nil from Get aligns with the corestore.KVStore interface.

179-194: LGTM!

The Iterator and ReverseIterator method implementations look good:

Constructing a goLevelDBIterator is the right approach.

The iterators are initialized to the correct position based on the start and end keys, which is important for correct behavior.

196-328: LGTM!

The goLevelDBIterator implementation looks good:

Wrapping iterator.Iterator is a clean approach.

Keeping track of the key range and direction is important for proper iteration.

The Valid method correctly checks if the iterator is within the valid key range.

Returning copies from Key and Value is good for safety.

The assertIsValid calls in Key and Value ensure the iterator is not misused.

330-414: LGTM!

The goLevelDBBatch implementation looks good:

Wrapping leveldb.Batch is a clean approach.

The empty key and nil value checks in Set prevent invalid data from being added to the batch.

The Close method correctly resets the batch to allow GC of the underlying data.

orm/model/ormdb/module_test.go (2)

363-363: LGTM!

The return type changes in the testStoreService struct methods are consistent and reflect the transition to the corestore package. The changes are localized to the test code and do not affect the functionality.

Also applies to: 367-367

397-397: LGTM!

The return type change in the ProvideTestRuntime function is consistent with the changes made in the testStoreService struct and reflects the transition to the corestore package. The change is localized to the test code and does not affect the functionality.

store/prefix/store_test.go (4)

10-10: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

93-93: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

102-102: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

Also applies to: 108-108, 154-154, 184-184, 212-212, 243-243

442-442: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

baseapp/utils_test.go (5)

22-22: LGTM!

The addition of the corestore import statement is approved.

209-209: Verify the usage of the db field in the paramStore methods.

The type of the db field has been changed to corestore.KVStoreWithBatch. Ensure that the Set, Has, and Get methods of paramStore are compatible with the new db type.

Line range hint 214-221: LGTM!

The Set method is correctly using the Set method of corestore.KVStoreWithBatch to store the consensus parameters.

Line range hint 223-225: LGTM!

The Has method is correctly using the Has method of corestore.KVStoreWithBatch to check the existence of the consensus parameters.

Line range hint 227-241: LGTM!

The Get method is correctly using the Get method of corestore.KVStoreWithBatch to retrieve the consensus parameters.

docs/learn/advanced/04-store.md (1)

160-160: LGTM!

The documentation update accurately reflects the change in the underlying memory database implementation used in Transient.Store.

store/cachekv/store_test.go (10)

10-10: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

18-18: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

26-26: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

69-69: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

77-77: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

293-293: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

310-310: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

329-329: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

377-377: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

437-437: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

store/iavl/store_test.go (18)

15-15: LGTM!

The import statement for the cosmossdk.io/core/testing package is correct.

Line range hint 40-58: LGTM!

The changes to the newAlohaTree function signature and implementation are correct. The function now accepts a corestore.KVStoreWithBatch parameter instead of *dbm.MemDB, which aligns with the objective of replacing the usage of dbm.MemDB.

62-62: LGTM!

The change to use coretesting.NewMemDB() instead of dbm.NewMemDB() for initializing the database in the TestLoadStore function is correct.

124-124: LGTM!

The change to use coretesting.NewMemDB() instead of dbm.NewMemDB() for initializing the database in the TestGetImmutable function is correct.

157-157: LGTM!

The change to use coretesting.NewMemDB() instead of dbm.NewMemDB() for initializing the database in the TestTestGetImmutableIterator function is correct.

180-180: LGTM!

The change to use coretesting.NewMemDB() instead of dbm.NewMemDB() for initializing the database in the TestIAVLStoreGetSetHasDelete function is correct.

205-205: LGTM!

The change to use coretesting.NewMemDB() instead of dbm.NewMemDB() for initializing the database in the TestIAVLStoreNoNilSet function is correct.

216-216: LGTM!

The change to use coretesting.NewMemDB() instead of dbm.NewMemDB() for initializing the database in the TestIAVLIterator function is correct.

289-289: LGTM!

The change to use coretesting.NewMemDB() instead of dbm.NewMemDB() for initializing the database in the TestIAVLReverseIterator function is correct.

323-323: LGTM!

The change to use coretesting.NewMemDB() instead of dbm.NewMemDB() for initializing the database in the TestIAVLPrefixIterator function is correct.

386-386: LGTM!

The change to use coretesting.NewMemDB() instead of dbm.NewMemDB() for initializing the database in the TestIAVLReversePrefixIterator function is correct.

453-453: LGTM!

The change to use coretesting.NewMemDB() instead of dbm.NewMemDB() for initializing the database in the TestIAVLNoPrune function is correct.

471-471: LGTM!

The change to use coretesting.NewMemDB() instead of dbm.NewMemDB() for initializing the database in the TestIAVLStoreQuery function is correct.

583-583: LGTM!

The change to use coretesting.NewMemDB() instead of dbm.NewMemDB() for initializing the database in the BenchmarkIAVLIteratorNext function is correct.

613-613: LGTM!

The change to the storeFn field in the test case struct to accept a parameter of type corestore.KVStoreWithBatch instead of *dbm.MemDB is correct.

618-618: LGTM!

The change to the storeFn implementation in the first test case to use corestore.KVStoreWithBatch instead of *dbm.MemDB is correct.

627-627: LGTM!

The change to the storeFn implementation in the second test case to use corestore.KVStoreWithBatch instead of *dbm.MemDB is correct.

645-645: LGTM!

The change to use coretesting.NewMemDB() instead of dbm.NewMemDB() for initializing the database in the test cases is correct.

baseapp/abci_utils_test.go (2)

22-22: LGTM!

The import statement changes are approved. Removing the dbm import and adding the coretesting import aligns with the PR objective of replacing the use cases related to cosmos-db in the tests with the core/testing framework.

480-480: LGTM!

The BaseApp instantiation changes are approved. Replacing dbm.NewMemDB() with coretesting.NewMemDB() aligns with the PR objective and the corresponding import statement changes.

testutil/network/network.go (1)

223-223: Looks good!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() aligns with the PR objective of replacing cosmos-db use cases in tests with the core/testing framework. This helps eliminate the cosmos-db dependency.

baseapp/baseapp_test.go (12)

17-17: LGTM!

The code change is approved. Importing the coretesting package aligns with the transition to a new testing utility as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.

71-71: LGTM!

The code change is approved. Replacing dbm.NewMemDB() with coretesting.NewMemDB() aligns with the update to the database instantiation as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.

81-81: LGTM!

The code change is approved. Replacing dbm.NewMemDB() with coretesting.NewMemDB() aligns with the update to the database instantiation as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.

99-99: LGTM!

The code change is approved. Replacing dbm.NewMemDB() with coretesting.NewMemDB() aligns with the update to the database instantiation as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.

119-119: LGTM!

The code change is approved. Replacing dbm.NewMemDB() with coretesting.NewMemDB() aligns with the update to the database instantiation as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.

238-238: LGTM!

The code change is approved. Replacing dbm.NewMemDB() with coretesting.NewMemDB() aligns with the update to the database instantiation as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.

361-361: LGTM!

The code change is approved. Replacing dbm.NewMemDB() with coretesting.NewMemDB() aligns with the update to the database instantiation as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.

390-390: LGTM!

The code change is approved. Replacing dbm.NewMemDB() with coretesting.NewMemDB() aligns with the update to the database instantiation as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.

413-413: LGTM!

The code change is approved. Replacing dbm.NewMemDB() with coretesting.NewMemDB() aligns with the update to the database instantiation as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.

450-450: LGTM!

The code change is approved. Replacing dbm.NewMemDB() with coretesting.NewMemDB() aligns with the update to the database instantiation as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.

699-699: LGTM!

The code change is approved. Replacing dbm.NewMemDB() with coretesting.NewMemDB() aligns with the update to the database instantiation as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.

845-845: LGTM!

The code change is approved. Replacing dbm.NewMemDB() with coretesting.NewMemDB() aligns with the update to the database instantiation as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.

store/rootmulti/store_test.go (22)

25-25: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

31-31: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

48-48: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

64-64: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

72-72: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

125-125: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

155-155: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

208-208: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

357-357: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

436-436: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

530-530: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

562-562: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

603-603: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

656-656: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

672-672: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

696-696: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

715-715: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

731-731: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

742-742: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

792-792: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

933-933: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

973-973: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

store/mock/core_store.go (1)

1-956: LGTM!

The auto-generated mock implementations in this file follow a consistent pattern and adhere to the Uber Go Style Guide. There are no obvious issues or deviations from best practices.

store/rootmulti/store.go (6)

19-19: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

22-22: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

631-631: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

1021-1021: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

1024-1024: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

Line range hint 1243-1256: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

baseapp/abci_test.go (9)

Line range hint 49-81: LGTM!

The TestABCI_Info function looks good. It properly tests the ABCI Info method of the BaseApp, verifying the response values and checking that they are updated correctly after finalizing and committing a block. No issues or refactoring opportunities identified.

Line range hint 83-105: LGTM!

The TestABCI_First_block_Height function properly tests the initial block height after initializing the chain. It verifies that the block height in the context is set to the specified initial height of 1 after committing the first block. The test is straightforward and covers the expected behavior.

Line range hint 107-190: LGTM!

The TestABCI_InitChain function provides a thorough test for the ABCI InitChain method of the BaseApp. It covers various scenarios, such as setting a custom InitChainer, checking the state before and after InitChain, and verifying the persistence of the state after committing a block. The test is well-structured and has comprehensive coverage. No issues or refactoring opportunities identified.

Line range hint 192-205: LGTM!

The TestABCI_InitChain_WithInitialHeight function provides a simple but effective test for the ABCI InitChain method with a custom initial height. It verifies that the last block height is set to the specified initial height of 3 after committing a block. The test covers the expected behavior and has no issues or refactoring opportunities.

Line range hint 207-242: LGTM!

The TestABCI_FinalizeBlock_WithInitialHeight function tests the ABCI FinalizeBlock method with a custom initial height. It covers the scenario where calling FinalizeBlock with a height different from the initial height results in an error, while calling it with the correct height succeeds. The test also verifies that the last block height is set to the initial height after committing the block. The test coverage is adequate, and no issues or refactoring opportunities are identified.

Line range hint 244-311: LGTM!

The TestABCI_FinalizeBlock_WithBeginAndEndBlocker function provides a thorough test for the ABCI FinalizeBlock method with custom BeginBlocker and EndBlocker functions. It verifies that the custom events added by the BeginBlocker and EndBlocker are present in the FinalizeBlock response and in the correct order. The test also checks that the last block height is updated after committing the block. The test coverage is comprehensive, and no issues or refactoring opportunities are identified.

Line range hint 313-393: LGTM!

The TestABCI_ExtendVote function provides a comprehensive test for the ABCI ExtendVote and VerifyVoteExtension methods of the BaseApp. It covers various scenarios, including calling the methods before and after the vote extensions enable height, verifying the responses, and testing error scenarios. The test sets up custom handlers for extending and verifying vote extensions and initializes the chain with vote extensions enabled at a specific height. The test coverage is extensive, and no major issues or refactoring opportunities are identified.

Line range hint 395-441: LGTM!

The TestABCI_OnlyVerifyVoteExtension function provides a focused test for the ABCI VerifyVoteExtension method without calling ExtendVote beforehand. It sets up a custom handler for verifying vote extensions and initializes the chain with vote extensions enabled at a specific height. The test covers calling VerifyVoteExtension before and after the enable height, verifying the responses, and testing error scenarios. The test coverage is adequate for the specific scenario, and no issues or refactoring opportunities are identified.

Line range hint 443-487: LGTM!

The TestABCI_GRPCQuery function tests the ABCI Query method with GRPC queries. It registers a custom GRPC query server implementation and covers the behavior of querying before the first block, expecting an error, and then querying after finalizing a block and committing, verifying the success and expected response. The test coverage is sufficient for the specific scenario, and no major issues or refactoring opportunities are identified.

coderabbitai · 2024-09-03T18:10:03Z

store/db/utils.go

+func cpIncr(bz []byte) (ret []byte) {
+	if len(bz) == 0 {
+		panic("cpIncr expects non-zero bz length")
+	}
+	ret = cp(bz)
+	for i := len(bz) - 1; i >= 0; i-- {
+		if ret[i] < byte(0xFF) {
+			ret[i]++
+			return
+		}
+		ret[i] = byte(0x00)
+		if i == 0 {
+			// Overflow
+			return nil
+		}
+	}
+	return nil
+}


Avoid panic and return an error instead.

Panicking on empty input is not idiomatic in Go. It's better to return an error.

Apply this diff to return an error instead of panicking:

-func cpIncr(bz []byte) (ret []byte) { +func cpIncr(bz []byte) (ret []byte, err error) { if len(bz) == 0 { - panic("cpIncr expects non-zero bz length") + return nil, errors.New("cpIncr expects non-zero bz length") } ret = cp(bz) for i := len(bz) - 1; i >= 0; i-- { if ret[i] < byte(0xFF) { ret[i]++ - return + return ret, nil } ret[i] = byte(0x00) if i == 0 { // Overflow - return nil + return nil, nil } } - return nil + return nil, nil }

Also, update the function usage to handle the returned error.

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change

func cpIncr(bz []byte) (ret []byte) {

if len(bz) == 0 {

panic("cpIncr expects non-zero bz length")

}

ret = cp(bz)

for i := len(bz) - 1; i >= 0; i-- {

if ret[i] < byte(0xFF) {

ret[i]++

return

}

ret[i] = byte(0x00)

if i == 0 {

// Overflow

return nil

}

}

return nil

}

func cpIncr(bz []byte) (ret []byte, err error) {

if len(bz) == 0 {

return nil, errors.New("cpIncr expects non-zero bz length")

}

ret = cp(bz)

for i := len(bz) - 1; i >= 0; i-- {

if ret[i] < byte(0xFF) {

ret[i]++

return ret, nil

}

ret[i] = byte(0x00)

if i == 0 {

// Overflow

return nil, nil

}

}

return nil, nil

}

coderabbitai · 2024-09-03T18:10:04Z

store/db/utils.go

+func IsKeyInDomain(key, start, end []byte) bool {
+	if bytes.Compare(key, start) < 0 {
+		return false
+	}
+	if end != nil && bytes.Compare(end, key) <= 0 {
+		return false
+	}
+	return true
+}


Consider simplifying the function by combining the if conditions.

The function can be simplified by combining the two if conditions into a single condition.

Apply this diff to simplify the function:

func IsKeyInDomain(key, start, end []byte) bool { - if bytes.Compare(key, start) < 0 { - return false - } - if end != nil && bytes.Compare(end, key) <= 0 { + if bytes.Compare(key, start) < 0 || (end != nil && bytes.Compare(end, key) <= 0) { return false } return true }

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change

func IsKeyInDomain(key, start, end []byte) bool {

if bytes.Compare(key, start) < 0 {

return false

}

if end != nil && bytes.Compare(end, key) <= 0 {

return false

}

return true

}

func IsKeyInDomain(key, start, end []byte) bool {

if bytes.Compare(key, start) < 0 || (end != nil && bytes.Compare(end, key) <= 0) {

return false

}

return true

}

coderabbitai

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)

simapp/app_test.go (1)
16-16: Test cases not fully updated to use coretesting.NewMemDB().

The following test files still contain instances of dbm.NewMemDB(), indicating that the update to coretesting.NewMemDB() has not been fully applied:

store/v2/root/upgrade_test.go

store/v2/root/migrate_test.go

store/v2/commitment/iavl/tree_test.go

store/v2/pruning/manager_test.go

store/v2/migration/manager_test.go

store/v2/root/store_test.go

orm/model/ormdb/module_test.go

orm/model/ormtable/table_test.go

orm/model/ormtable/bench_test.go

Please ensure these instances are updated to maintain consistency across the test suite.

Analysis chain

Verify all relevant test cases have been updated.

Please ensure that all test cases that previously used dbm.NewMemDB() have been updated to use coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing the database. This will maintain consistency across the test suite and ensure that the new testing package is fully utilized.

Also applies to: 47-47, 89-89, 235-235, 274-274
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all relevant test cases have been updated to use coretesting.NewMemDB().

# Test: Search for dbm.NewMemDB() usage in test files. Expect: No results found.
rg --type go --glob '*_test.go' $'dbm.NewMemDB'
Length of output: 2050

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a8fefd5 and 0882e95.

Files ignored due to path filters (26)

client/v2/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
server/v2/cometbft/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
simapp/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
store/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
tests/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
x/accounts/defaults/lockup/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
x/accounts/defaults/multisig/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
x/accounts/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
x/authz/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
x/bank/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
x/circuit/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
x/consensus/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
x/distribution/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
x/epochs/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
x/evidence/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
x/feegrant/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
x/gov/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
x/group/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
x/mint/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
x/nft/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
x/params/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
x/protocolpool/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
x/slashing/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
x/staking/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
x/upgrade/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum

Files selected for processing (21)

baseapp/abci_test.go (19 hunks)
baseapp/abci_utils_test.go (3 hunks)
baseapp/baseapp_test.go (12 hunks)
baseapp/msg_service_router_test.go (5 hunks)
baseapp/utils_test.go (2 hunks)
client/v2/go.mod (1 hunks)
server/mock/app.go (2 hunks)
server/v2/cometbft/go.mod (1 hunks)
server/v2/testdata/app.toml (2 hunks)
simapp/app_test.go (5 hunks)
simapp/go.mod (2 hunks)
simapp/gomod2nix.toml (12 hunks)
simapp/sim_bench_test.go (2 hunks)
store/go.mod (1 hunks)
tests/go.mod (1 hunks)
testutils/sims/runner.go (1 hunks)
x/accounts/defaults/lockup/go.mod (1 hunks)
x/group/go.mod (4 hunks)
x/nft/go.mod (1 hunks)
x/params/go.mod (2 hunks)
x/upgrade/go.mod (2 hunks)

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)

baseapp/abci_utils_test.go
client/v2/go.mod
simapp/go.mod
x/accounts/defaults/lockup/go.mod
x/nft/go.mod

Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (13)

baseapp/abci_test.go
baseapp/baseapp_test.go
baseapp/msg_service_router_test.go
baseapp/utils_test.go
server/mock/app.go
server/v2/cometbft/go.mod
server/v2/testdata/app.toml
simapp/sim_bench_test.go
store/go.mod
tests/go.mod
x/group/go.mod
x/params/go.mod
x/upgrade/go.mod

Additional context used

Path-based instructions (2)

testutils/sims/runner.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

simapp/app_test.go (2)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

Pattern **/*_test.go: "Assess the unit test code assessing sufficient code coverage for the changes associated in the pull request"

Additional comments not posted (8)

testutils/sims/runner.go (1)

139-142: LGTM!

The change from dbm.DB to simtestutil.DBStatsInterface for the database instance passed to the PrintStats function is a good improvement. It enhances the flexibility and functionality of the testing framework by using a more specific interface for database statistics.

simapp/app_test.go (4)

16-16: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing the database in the TestSimAppExportAndBlockedAddrs test function is a good improvement. It aligns the testing framework with the new cosmossdk.io/core/testing package.

Also applies to: 47-47

16-16: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing the database in the TestRunMigrations test function is a good improvement. It aligns the testing framework with the new cosmossdk.io/core/testing package.

Also applies to: 89-89

16-16: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing the database in the TestInitGenesisOnMigration test function is a good improvement. It aligns the testing framework with the new cosmossdk.io/core/testing package.

Also applies to: 235-235

16-16: LGTM!

The change from dbm.NewMemDB() to coretesting.NewMemDB() for initializing the database in the TestUpgradeStateOnGenesis test function is a good improvement. It aligns the testing framework with the new cosmossdk.io/core/testing package.

Also applies to: 274-274

simapp/gomod2nix.toml (3)

28-30: LGTM!

The addition of the new cosmossdk.io/core dependency with version v1.0.0-alpha.1 is approved. This dependency is necessary for the project and its inclusion is a positive change.

84-85: LGTM!

The version updates for existing dependencies are approved. Keeping the dependencies up-to-date is important for maintaining compatibility, fixing bugs, and accessing new features and performance improvements.

Also applies to: 96-97, 99-100, 105-106, 114-115, 117-118, 366-367, 396-397, 405-406, 411-412, 438-439, 465-466, 517-518, 535-536, 538-539, 541-542

28-30: Verify compatibility of updated dependencies.

Please ensure that the updated dependencies, including the newly added cosmossdk.io/core, are compatible with the project and do not introduce any breaking changes. Thoroughly test the project with the updated dependencies to catch any potential issues.

Also applies to: 84-85, 96-97, 99-100, 105-106, 114-115, 117-118, 366-367, 396-397, 405-406, 411-412, 438-439, 465-466, 517-518, 535-536, 538-539, 541-542

tac0turtle · 2024-09-11T08:11:34Z

server/v2/testdata/app.toml

@@ -10,42 +10,12 @@ max-recv-msg-size = 10485760
 # The default value is math.MaxInt32.
 max-send-msg-size = 2147483647

-[server]


should revert this, not sure why its being modified. Happened to me to

tac0turtle

nice cleanup

items addressed

tac0turtle · 2024-09-13T14:00:03Z

conflicts pulled the pr out of the merge queue

…#21525) (cherry picked from commit aaf72f2) # Conflicts: # core/testing/memdb.go # simapp/go.mod # simapp/sim_bench_test.go # store/cache/cache_test.go # store/cachekv/benchmark_test.go # store/cachekv/store.go # store/cachekv/store_bench_test.go # store/cachekv/store_test.go # store/dbadapter/store_test.go # store/gaskv/store_test.go # store/go.mod # store/go.sum # store/iavl/store_test.go # store/iavl/tree_test.go # store/listenkv/store_test.go # store/mem/store.go # store/prefix/store_test.go # store/pruning/manager_test.go # store/rootmulti/proof_test.go # store/rootmulti/snapshot_test.go # store/rootmulti/store.go # store/rootmulti/store_test.go # store/snapshots/helpers_test.go # store/snapshots/manager_test.go # store/snapshots/store.go # store/snapshots/store_test.go # store/tracekv/store_test.go # store/transient/store.go # store/types/iterator_test.go # x/group/go.mod # x/nft/go.mod # x/params/go.mod

… (backport #21525) (#21720) Co-authored-by: cool-developer <51834436+cool-develope@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Julien Robert <julien@rbrt.fr>

* main: test: fix sims (#21735) build: bump proto-builder (#21730) refactor(schema)!: rename IntegerStringKind and DecimalStringKind (#21694) feat(types/collections): add `LegacyDec` collection value (#21693) refactor(server): alias AppOptions to coreserver.DynamicConfig (#21711) refactor(simapp): simplify simapp di (#21718) feat: replace the cosmos-db usecases in the tests with `core/testing` (#21525) feat(runtime/v2): store loader on simappv2 (#21704) docs(x/auth): vesting (#21715) build(deps): Bump google.golang.org/grpc from 1.66.1 to 1.66.2 (#21670) refactor(systemtest): Add cli.RunAndWait for common operations (#21689) fix(runtime/v2): provide default factory options if unset in app builder (#21690) chore: remove duplicate proto files for the same proto file (#21648) feat(x/genutil): add better error messages for genesis validation (#21701) build(deps): Bump cosmossdk.io/core from 1.0.0-alpha.1 to 1.0.0-alpha.2 (#21698) test: migrate e2e/bank to system tests (#21607) chore: fix the gci lint issue in testutil (#21695) docs(x/authz): update grant docs (#21677)

cool-develope added 2 commits September 3, 2024 13:14

replace the cosmos-db with core/testing

75fe7c5

add missing files

411f7ac

cool-develope requested review from a team, facundomedica, akhilkumarpilli, lucaslopezf, kocubinski, julienrbrt, sontrinh16, hieuvubk, aaronc and testinginprod as code owners September 3, 2024 17:16

github-actions bot added C:CLI C:Store C:x/params C:x/upgrade C:x/group C:x/nft C:orm C:collections C:server/v2 Issues related to server/v2 C:x/accounts C:core/testing C:x/accounts/lockup C:server/v2 cometbft labels Sep 3, 2024

Merge branch 'main' into testing/cosmos-db

334739f

coderabbitai bot reviewed Sep 3, 2024

View reviewed changes

coderabbitai bot reviewed Sep 10, 2024

View reviewed changes

Merge branch 'main' into testing/cosmos-db

15ac935

tac0turtle reviewed Sep 11, 2024

View reviewed changes

tac0turtle approved these changes Sep 11, 2024

View reviewed changes

cool-develope and others added 3 commits September 11, 2024 14:17

wip

2ea484c

Merge branch 'main' into testing/cosmos-db

c49061e

fix tests

ae63828

cool-develope enabled auto-merge September 11, 2024 19:48

cool-develope requested a review from kocubinski September 11, 2024 19:49

sontrinh16 approved these changes Sep 11, 2024

View reviewed changes

cool-develope added 2 commits September 12, 2024 07:05

Merge branch 'main' into testing/cosmos-db

67503b9

go mod

c544159

cool-develope added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 13, 2024

julienrbrt added the backport/v0.52.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.52's next stable release label Sep 13, 2024

github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Sep 13, 2024

Merge branch 'main' into testing/cosmos-db

b5ab662

github-actions bot removed the C:orm label Sep 13, 2024

cool-develope added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 13, 2024

Merged via the queue into main with commit aaf72f2 Sep 13, 2024
92 of 94 checks passed

cool-develope deleted the testing/cosmos-db branch September 13, 2024 16:49

mergify bot mentioned this pull request Sep 13, 2024

feat: replace the cosmos-db usecases in the tests with core/testing (backport #21525) #21720

Merged

12 tasks

This was referenced Sep 16, 2024

feat(store): migrate db backends to store/db and remove the cosmos-db deps completely #21765

Open

refactor(mempool)!: match server/v2/cometbft and sdk mempool interface #21744

Merged

feat(server/v2): refactor the server/v2 events #21785

Merged

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

feat: replace the cosmos-db usecases in the tests with `core/testing` #21525

feat: replace the cosmos-db usecases in the tests with `core/testing` #21525

cool-develope commented Sep 3, 2024 •

edited by coderabbitai bot

Loading

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 3, 2024 •

edited

Loading

Rate limit exceeded

Walkthrough

Changes

Sequence Diagram(s)

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

Chat

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

Other keywords and placeholders

Documentation and Community

coderabbitai bot left a comment

coderabbitai bot Sep 3, 2024

coderabbitai bot left a comment

coderabbitai bot left a comment

coderabbitai bot Sep 3, 2024

coderabbitai bot Sep 3, 2024

coderabbitai bot left a comment

tac0turtle Sep 11, 2024

tac0turtle left a comment

tac0turtle commented Sep 13, 2024

feat: replace the cosmos-db usecases in the tests with core/testing #21525

feat: replace the cosmos-db usecases in the tests with core/testing #21525

Conversation

cool-develope commented Sep 3, 2024 • edited by coderabbitai bot Loading

Description

Author Checklist

Reviewers Checklist

Summary by CodeRabbit

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 3, 2024 • edited Loading

Rate limit exceeded

Walkthrough

Changes

Sequence Diagram(s)

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

Chat

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

Other keywords and placeholders

Documentation and Community

coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

coderabbitai bot Sep 3, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

coderabbitai bot Sep 3, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

coderabbitai bot Sep 3, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

tac0turtle Sep 11, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

tac0turtle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

tac0turtle commented Sep 13, 2024

feat: replace the cosmos-db usecases in the tests with `core/testing` #21525

feat: replace the cosmos-db usecases in the tests with `core/testing` #21525

cool-develope commented Sep 3, 2024 •

edited by coderabbitai bot

Loading

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 3, 2024 •

edited

Loading