test: print the value initialStake instead of its pointer

[ggrieco-tob]

Description

This small change ensure that the debug print shows the value of initialStake instead of its pointer.

---

Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

• included the correct type prefix in the PR title
• added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
• targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
• provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
• followed the guidelines for building modules
• included the necessary unit and integration tests
• added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
• included comments for documenting Go code
• updated the relevant documentation or specification
• reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
• confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

• confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
• confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
• confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
• reviewed state machine logic
• reviewed API design and naming
• reviewed documentation is accurate
• reviewed tests and test coverage
• manually tested (if applicable)

[ggrieco-tob]

Hi!

This is my first PR. I'm wondering if:

• Should I create an issue to address?
• Is it necessary to edit the CHANGELOG.md for such a small change?
• Is there something to document?

[julienrbrt]

Hi!

This is my first PR. I'm wondering if:

• Should I create an issue to address?
• Is it necessary to edit the CHANGELOG.md for such a small change?
• Is there something to document?

Hi, thank you for your PR!

1. Normally yes, but given that it is a small change, and you have explained what it does and the reason of the change in the description, this is ok. Thank you for that.
2. Same as above :)
3. Nope

[ggrieco-tob]

Thanks for the quick response! I'm still waiting for the CI to finish, but after that should be good to review.

[ggrieco-tob]

It seems that the linter test failed:

API rate limit exceeded for installation ID 5766626.

Can someone from the team re-run that test later?