-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: remove api that should not be used #15678
Merged
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e978de0
test: remove api that should not be used
julienrbrt e602b01
updates
julienrbrt 1fc92a7
feedback
julienrbrt e94867d
improve comment
julienrbrt 465cb07
Merge branch 'main' into julien/clean-up
julienrbrt 5e25fac
Merge branch 'main' into julien/clean-up
julienrbrt File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ | ||
package testutil | ||
|
||
import ( | ||
"testing" | ||
|
||
"github.com/google/go-cmp/cmp" | ||
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require" | ||
"google.golang.org/protobuf/testing/protocmp" | ||
) | ||
|
||
// ProtoDeepEqual is a helper function that uses the protocmp package to compare two protobuf messages. | ||
func ProtoDeepEqual(t *testing.T, p1, p2 interface{}) { | ||
t.Helper() | ||
require.Empty(t, cmp.Diff(p1, p2, protocmp.Transform())) | ||
} |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
RequireProtoDeepEqual
is probably a better function name.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
And this is why I am going to request reviews from you more often :D
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For that matter, I think
p1
andp2
should be of typeproto.Message
iirc.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cmp.Diff
acceptsinterface{}
, so I think we should accept interfaces as well.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cmp.Diff
does acceptany
, but I'm not sure what the intended behavior is if a programmer mistakenly passes a non-proto.Message
type when usingprotocmp.Transform
. If there is a runtime failure in that case, then it would be better to fail earlier, at compile time.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, maybe
proto.Message
would be too restrictive if you were comparing slices instead. Maybe the doc should mention that the function can handle values or slices in the case of continuing to acceptany
forp1
andp2
.