Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bindings: skip flaky pause/unpause test #7143

Merged

Conversation

edsantiago
Copy link
Member

The "podman wait to pause|unpause condition" test is failing
several times a day, always a flake. Issue #6518.

Disable it until the cause can be identified and fixed.

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago santiago@redhat.com

The "podman wait to pause|unpause condition" test is failing
several times a day, always a flake. Issue containers#6518.

Disable it until the cause can be identified and fixed.

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
@edsantiago
Copy link
Member Author

Confirmed: test is being skipped - search in-page for 'pause cond'

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Jul 29, 2020

LGTM

1 similar comment
@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@edsantiago
Copy link
Member Author

Filed #7148 for flake. This is distressing: we all hoped that containers/crun#423 would resolve this.

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Jul 29, 2020

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 29, 2020
@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Jul 29, 2020

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: edsantiago, mheon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 29, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit eaa2f52 into containers:master Jul 29, 2020
@edsantiago edsantiago deleted the skip_flaky_binding_test branch July 29, 2020 19:25
edsantiago added a commit to edsantiago/libpod that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2020
Reference: containers#6518, a very-frequently-flaking CI test, disabled
a month ago (containers#7143) because it was triggering so often in CI.
Unfortunately, that seems to have simply swept the problem
under the rug. AFAICT nobody has bothered to look at the
root bug, so let's just reenable. If the problem persists,
I'll let annoyed developers squeaky-wheel 6158 so there's
some incentive to fix it. If the problem has miraculously
gone away in the last month, that's a win too.

(This test failure does not reproduce on my laptop, nor
does it lend itself to devising a simple reproducer on
a test VM.)

Also: since containers#5325 appears to have been closed as fixed,
remove a 'Skip' that references it. Unfortunately this
also requires removing a lot of other cruft. This was
an incidental oh-by-the-way addition that I thought
would be trivial but ended up causing a much larger diff.

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
edsantiago added a commit to edsantiago/libpod that referenced this pull request Sep 14, 2020
Reference: containers#6518, a very-frequently-flaking CI test, disabled
a month ago (containers#7143) because it was triggering so often in CI.
Unfortunately, that seems to have simply swept the problem
under the rug. AFAICT nobody has bothered to look at the
root bug, so let's just reenable. If the problem persists,
I'll let annoyed developers squeaky-wheel 6158 so there's
some incentive to fix it. If the problem has miraculously
gone away in the last month, that's a win too.

(This test failure does not reproduce on my laptop, nor
does it lend itself to devising a simple reproducer on
a test VM.)

Also: since containers#5325 appears to have been closed as fixed,
remove a 'Skip' that references it. Unfortunately this
also requires removing a lot of other cruft. This was
an incidental oh-by-the-way addition that I thought
would be trivial but ended up causing a much larger diff.

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 24, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 24, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants