Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

libpod: change the default rootless cgroup path parent #24301

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rpigott
Copy link

@rpigott rpigott commented Oct 16, 2024

user.slice is a poor choice of slice name to put containers in. There is no direct conflict with the system user.slice, but it may still be easily confused by humans and isn't descriptive of its purpose. After user.slice, user-$UID.slice, user@$uid.service, we don't need another user.slice if we can avoid it.

Let's change user.slice to containers.slice to better represent its usage and help disambiguate it from a slew of user cgroups.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 16, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rpigott
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign mheon for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@rpigott rpigott changed the title libpod: change the default cgroup path parent libpod: change the default rootless cgroup path parent Oct 16, 2024
@Luap99
Copy link
Member

Luap99 commented Oct 17, 2024

@giuseppe PTAL

@giuseppe giuseppe added the No New Tests Allow PR to proceed without adding regression tests label Oct 17, 2024
@giuseppe
Copy link
Member

there is no particular reason for using user.slice so I am ok if we want to change it.

Please adjust all the other occurrences of user.slice in the code, documentation and tests

user.slice is a poor choice of slice name to put containers in. There is
no direct conflict with the system user.slice, but it may still be
easily confused by humans and isn't descriptive of its purpose. After
user.slice, user-$UID.slice, user@$uid.service, we don't need another
user.slice if we can avoid it.

Let's change user.slice to container.slice to better represent its
usage and help disambiguate it from a slew of user cgroups.

Signed-off-by: Ronan Pigott <ronan@rjp.ie>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
No New Tests Allow PR to proceed without adding regression tests release-note-none
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants