Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

podman run -t issues CRLF, making for confusing 'podman logs' output #7942

Closed
edsantiago opened this issue Oct 6, 2020 · 14 comments · Fixed by #8272
Closed

podman run -t issues CRLF, making for confusing 'podman logs' output #7942

edsantiago opened this issue Oct 6, 2020 · 14 comments · Fixed by #8272
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. stale-issue

Comments

@edsantiago
Copy link
Member

In window 1 (needed to differentiate podman-remote from podman, in logs):

$ bin/podman system service --timeout=0

In window 2:

$ ./bin/podman run --name foo -t alpine sh -c 'echo 1;echo 2'
1
2
$ ./bin/podman logs foo|cat -vT
1^M       <--- CR
2^M
$ ./bin/podman-remote logs foo|cat -vT
1         <--- podman-remote emits those as LF; two lines for the price of one

2

$ for i in "" "-remote";do ./bin/podman$i logs foo|wc -l;done                                                                                         -
2
4

master @ defb754, but seems to be in v2.1 and possibly older as well. Root as well as rootless.

This is, I believe, causing flakes in a podman logs test

@zhangguanzhang
Copy link
Collaborator

same with #7196 (comment) containers/conmon#195 (comment)

@edsantiago
Copy link
Member Author

Indeed - thank you. This was a very hard problem to search for!

@rhatdan rhatdan added the kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. label Oct 7, 2020
@eiffel-fl
Copy link

eiffel-fl commented Oct 7, 2020

If this issue can be a good first one then I can try to investigate on this issue but can someone give me more information (if someone has some)?
Indeed, I did not understand if this problem was fixed by #7660 and where exactly this problem occurs (podman-remote or conmon).

@zhangguanzhang
Copy link
Collaborator

zhangguanzhang commented Oct 8, 2020

If this issue can be a good first one then I can try to investigate on this issue but can someone give me more information (if someone has some)?
Indeed, I did not understand if this problem was fixed by #7660 and where exactly this problem occurs (podman-remote or conmon).

The root cause is this

[psakar@localhost podman]$ podman run --rm --tty busybox echo 1 | cat -A
1^M$
    [psakar@localhost podman]$ podman run --rm --tty busybox echo 1 ; echo 2 | cat -A
1
2$
[psakar@localhost podman]$ 

-t will trigger it

@eiffel-fl
Copy link

Thank you, I do not promise to come back with a PR but I will investigate on this to try to narrow the root cause.

@eiffel-fl
Copy link

eiffel-fl commented Oct 8, 2020

Unfortunately, I do not come with a solution and maybe more problems...

First, I printed buf in redirectResponseToOutputStreams after it was read with conn.Read(buf), for this example ./bin/podman --log-level debug run --rm --tty debian sh -c 'echo 1; echo 2' | cat -A I got the following from debug log:

...
buffer is [2 49 13 10 50 13 10]
...

Where 2 is the pipe where to write, 49 is ASCII code of '1', 13 that of \r and 10 that of \n.
Of course, running the above command without --tty remove the \r from buf.

So, I search what writes conn.
I looked into conmon code and after call to read into read_stdio I printed bufwhich gives (for the same command):

...
Read 1#015#0122#015#012 from read_stdio (10)
...

Here 1 is 1, 015 is 13 so \r and 012 is 10 so \n.
Of course, without --tty it removes 015 from this output.

My understanding of interactions between podman, conmon and crun is still limited.
If I understand well, podman is just the command line or the thing the user interacts with.
conmon can act as a daemon and comes after podman.
Finally, crun receives order from something and create cgroup by playing with the sysfs.

So, in this case, what is writing mainfd_stdout? Is it crun (I searched slightly and found nothing about this in crun code)? Or is it the process inside the container?

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 8, 2020

A friendly reminder that this issue had no activity for 30 days.

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Nov 8, 2020

@haircommander @giuseppe PTAL
Could you answer @eiffel-fl questions?

@eiffel-fl the problem is in both the cases of podman-remote and podman conmon/crun/PID1 are working the same way. The problem being reported here is that when podman-remote logs reports back, it seems to be confused.

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Nov 8, 2020

Going back to @edsantiago original tests, I run

# podman run --tty --rm busybox echo 1; echo 2 | cat -vT
# podman-remote run --name foo2 -t alpine sh -c 'echo 1;echo 2'

And then look at the log files on disk and they are identical

# cat $(podman inspect --format '{{ .LogPath }}' foo1)
2020-11-08T07:08:05.549884452-05:00 stdout F 1
2020-11-08T07:08:05.549884452-05:00 stdout F 2
# cat $(podman inspect --format '{{ .LogPath }}' foo2)
2020-11-08T07:08:13.673393569-05:00 stdout F 1
2020-11-08T07:08:13.673393569-05:00 stdout F 2

So this is not an issue with running the containers, but viewing the container logs.

# podman logs foo1
1
2
# podman-remote logs foo1
1

2

@eiffel-fl I think you are exposing a different bug where the final character printed via podman run is different then podman-remote run. But that should be opened as a different issue.

Bottom line @edsantiago is reporting a bug in podman-remote logs

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Nov 8, 2020

# cat -A $(podman inspect --format '{{ .LogPath }}' foo1)
2020-11-08T07:08:05.549884452-05:00 stdout F 1^M$
2020-11-08T07:08:05.549884452-05:00 stdout F 2^M$
# cat -A $(podman inspect --format '{{ .LogPath }}' foo2)
2020-11-08T07:08:13.673393569-05:00 stdout F 1^M$
2020-11-08T07:08:13.673393569-05:00 stdout F 2^M$

rhatdan added a commit to rhatdan/podman that referenced this issue Nov 8, 2020
When we print podman-remote logs, we are seeing extra newlines.

Fixes: containers#7942

Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
@eiffel-fl
Copy link

Hi @rhatdan.

I quickly read your messages, I will investigate more on the CRLF bug next week, unfortunately I am bit busy now...
By the way, it is good that you fixed the bug in podman log!
Moreover, with your precisions I will be able to search more precisely for the bug, thank you!

Best regards.

rhatdan added a commit to rhatdan/podman that referenced this issue Nov 8, 2020
When we print podman-remote logs, we are seeing extra newlines.

Fixes: containers#7942

Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
rhatdan added a commit to rhatdan/podman that referenced this issue Nov 9, 2020
When we print podman-remote logs, we are seeing extra newlines.

Fixes: containers#7942

Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
rhatdan added a commit to rhatdan/podman that referenced this issue Nov 9, 2020
Fixes: containers#7942

Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Nov 10, 2020

@eiffel-fl I think @jwhonce might have fixed your issue in podman-remote overlay. It definitely fixed this issue.

@rhatdan rhatdan closed this as completed Nov 10, 2020
rhatdan added a commit to rhatdan/podman that referenced this issue Nov 10, 2020
Fixes: containers#7942

Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
@eiffel-fl
Copy link

If this issue is fixed it is perfect! podman can advance and this is the important!

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Nov 12, 2020

Awesome.

vrothberg pushed a commit to vrothberg/libpod that referenced this issue Nov 24, 2020
Fixes: containers#7942

Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 22, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 22, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. stale-issue
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants