Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix loop of OffsetForLeaderEpoch requests on quick leader changes #4433

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Sep 29, 2023
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 8 additions & 0 deletions CHANGELOG.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ librdkafka v2.3.0 is a feature release:
* Fix a segmentation fault when closing a consumer using the
cooperative-sticky assignor before the first assignment (#4381).
* Fix for insufficient buffer allocation when allocating rack information (@wolfchimneyrock, #4449).
* Fix for infinite loop of OffsetForLeaderEpoch requests on quick leader changes. (#4433).
* Fix to add leader epoch to control messages, to make sure they're stored
for committing even without a subsequent fetch message (#4434).
* Fix for stored offsets not being committed if they lacked the leader epoch (#4442).
Expand All @@ -42,6 +43,13 @@ librdkafka v2.3.0 is a feature release:
than committed one, if either stored or committed leader epoch is -1 (#4442).


### Consumer Fixes

* If an OffsetForLeaderEpoch request was being retried, and the leader changed
while the retry was in-flight, an infinite loop of requests was triggered,
because we weren't updating the leader epoch correctly.
Fixed by updating the leader epoch before sending the request (#4433).


# librdkafka v2.2.0

Expand Down
8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions src/rdkafka_topic.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -682,9 +682,7 @@ static int rd_kafka_toppar_leader_update(rd_kafka_topic_t *rkt,
}
}

if (rktp->rktp_fetch_state == RD_KAFKA_TOPPAR_FETCH_VALIDATE_EPOCH_WAIT)
need_epoch_validation = rd_true;
else if (leader_epoch > rktp->rktp_leader_epoch) {
if (leader_epoch > rktp->rktp_leader_epoch) {
rd_kafka_dbg(rktp->rktp_rkt->rkt_rk, TOPIC, "BROKER",
"%s [%" PRId32 "]: leader %" PRId32
" epoch %" PRId32 " -> leader %" PRId32
Expand All @@ -694,7 +692,9 @@ static int rd_kafka_toppar_leader_update(rd_kafka_topic_t *rkt,
rktp->rktp_leader_epoch, leader_id, leader_epoch);
rktp->rktp_leader_epoch = leader_epoch;
need_epoch_validation = rd_true;
}
} else if (rktp->rktp_fetch_state ==
RD_KAFKA_TOPPAR_FETCH_VALIDATE_EPOCH_WAIT)
need_epoch_validation = rd_true;

fetching_from_follower =
leader != NULL && rktp->rktp_broker != NULL &&
Expand Down
85 changes: 85 additions & 0 deletions tests/0139-offset_validation_mock.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -212,6 +212,89 @@ static void do_test_ssl_error_retried(void) {
}


/**
* @brief If there's an OffsetForLeaderEpoch request which fails, and the leader
* changes meanwhile, we end up in an infinite loop of OffsetForLeaderEpoch
* requests.
* Specifically:
* a. Leader Change - causes OffsetForLeaderEpoch
* request 'A'.
* b. Request 'A' fails with a retriable error, and we retry it.
* c. While waiting for Request 'A', the leader changes again, and we send a
* Request 'B', but the leader epoch is not updated correctly in this
* request, causing a loop.
*
* See #4425.
*/
static void do_test_two_leader_changes(void) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you confirm that this test fails with the old code?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep, it fails with a timeout after we enter the infinite loop

const char *topic = test_mk_topic_name(__FUNCTION__, 1);
const char *c1_groupid = topic;
rd_kafka_t *c1;
const char *bootstraps;
rd_kafka_mock_cluster_t *mcluster;
int msg_cnt = 5;
uint64_t testid = test_id_generate();
rd_kafka_conf_t *conf;

SUB_TEST_QUICK();

mcluster = test_mock_cluster_new(2, &bootstraps);
rd_kafka_mock_topic_create(mcluster, topic, 1, 2);
rd_kafka_mock_partition_set_leader(mcluster, topic, 0, 1);

/* Seed the topic with messages */
test_produce_msgs_easy_v(topic, testid, 0, 0, msg_cnt, 10,
"bootstrap.servers", bootstraps,
"batch.num.messages", "1", NULL);

test_conf_init(&conf, NULL, 60);
test_conf_set(conf, "bootstrap.servers", bootstraps);
test_conf_set(conf, "auto.offset.reset", "earliest");

c1 = test_create_consumer(c1_groupid, NULL, conf, NULL);
test_consumer_subscribe(c1, topic);

/* Consume initial messages and join the group, etc. */
test_consumer_poll("MSG_INIT", c1, testid, 0, 0, msg_cnt, NULL);

/* The leader will change from 1->2, and the OffsetForLeaderEpoch will
* be sent to broker 2. We need to first fail it with
* an error, and then give enough time to change the leader before
* returning a success. */
rd_kafka_mock_broker_push_request_error_rtts(
mcluster, 2, RD_KAFKAP_OffsetForLeaderEpoch, 2,
RD_KAFKA_RESP_ERR_KAFKA_STORAGE_ERROR, 900,
RD_KAFKA_RESP_ERR_NO_ERROR, 1000);

rd_kafka_mock_partition_set_leader(mcluster, topic, 0, 2);
rd_kafka_poll(c1, 1000);
/* Enough time to make a request, fail with a retriable error, and
* retry. */
rd_sleep(1);

/* Reset leader. */
rd_kafka_mock_partition_set_leader(mcluster, topic, 0, 1);
rd_kafka_poll(c1, 1000);
rd_sleep(1);

/* There should be no infinite loop of OffsetForLeaderEpoch, and
* consequently, we should be able to consume these messages as a sign
* of success. */
test_produce_msgs_easy_v(topic, testid, 0, 0, msg_cnt, 10,
"bootstrap.servers", bootstraps,
"batch.num.messages", "1", NULL);

test_consumer_poll("MSG_INIT", c1, testid, 0, 0, msg_cnt, NULL);


rd_kafka_destroy(c1);

test_mock_cluster_destroy(mcluster);

TEST_LATER_CHECK();
SUB_TEST_PASS();
}

/**
* @brief Storing an offset without leader epoch should still be allowed
* and the greater than check should apply only to the offset.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -353,6 +436,8 @@ int main_0139_offset_validation_mock(int argc, char **argv) {

do_test_ssl_error_retried();

do_test_two_leader_changes();

do_test_store_offset_without_leader_epoch();

return 0;
Expand Down