Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use a quicker example for the channel-inversion test #688

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 10, 2024

Conversation

maresb
Copy link
Contributor

@maresb maresb commented Sep 10, 2024

Description

This test case has an average duration of 141 seconds, compared with the next-highest durations in the 70-90s range for test_run_lock*. Now this test runs in 25 seconds.

AFAICT we just need to check that the lockfile references a package with an out-of-order channel when that channel is specified. The newer example should accomplish this with a much lower overhead.

@maresb maresb requested a review from a team as a code owner September 10, 2024 19:08
Copy link

netlify bot commented Sep 10, 2024

Deploy Preview for conda-lock ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit b272ad5
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/conda-lock/deploys/66e09919c0f69800087b914d
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-688--conda-lock.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@maresb maresb merged commit 886b474 into conda:main Sep 10, 2024
20 of 22 checks passed
@maresb maresb deleted the faster-channel-inversion-test branch September 10, 2024 20:07
@maresb
Copy link
Contributor Author

maresb commented Sep 11, 2024

Great to see you around @mariusvniekerk!!! I'm just charging full speed ahead because my default assumption is that you're busy.

Please feel free to chime in on anything/everything. I'm especially interested in your feedback on this one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant