Rebuild for cuda for ppc64le and aarch64

[regro-cf-autotick-bot]

This PR has been triggered in an effort to update cuda_112_ppc64le_aarch64.

Notes and instructions for merging this PR:

1. Please merge the PR only after the tests have passed.
2. Feel free to push to the bot's branch to update this PR if needed.

Please note that if you close this PR we presume that the feedstock has been rebuilt, so if you are going to perform the rebuild yourself don't close this PR until the your rebuild has been merged.

If this PR was opened in error or needs to be updated please add the bot-rerun label to this PR. The bot will close this PR and schedule another one. If you do not have permissions to add this label, you can use the phrase @conda-forge-admin, please rerun bot in a PR comment to have the conda-forge-admin add it for you.

_{This PR was created by the regro-cf-autotick-bot. The regro-cf-autotick-bot is a service to automatically track the dependency graph, migrate packages, and propose package version updates for conda-forge. Feel free to drop us a line if there are any issues! This PR was generated by https://github.com/regro/cf-scripts/actions/runs/4696813901, please use this URL for debugging.}

[conda-forge-webservices]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[mikemhenry]

Looks like it compiles fine but we get this error at the very end:

 /lib/ld-linux-aarch64.so.1: bad ELF interpreter: No such file or directory

[peastman]

According to https://www.baeldung.com/linux/bad-elf-interpreter, that error is usually caused by trying to run a 32 bit application on a 64 bit OS.

[mikemhenry]

Yah so I think the cross-compilation works but then I think it barfs on the test, I think I will need to add a bit that skips the tests when not build on the target arch.

@peastman I want to get GPU stuff going since it seems like a higher priority, but do you know if anyone would even use these builds?

[peastman]

I can't quite tell what's new here. How are these builds different from the existing ARM Linux builds?

[jaimergp]

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

[jaimergp]

Ready to merge @peastman @mikemhenry

[peastman]

Looks ok to me as far as I can tell. Though again, it isn't clear to me how these builds differ from the existing ones?

[jaimergp]

The pinnings are a bit different (compilers, numpy version, etc). Mostly to ensure ABI compatibility with the rest of the ecosystem.