Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test jlpm versions, test with nodejs lts, bump build number #110

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

test jlpm versions, test with nodejs lts, bump build number #110

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

bollwyvl
Copy link
Contributor

Checklist

  • Used a fork of the feedstock to propose changes
  • Bumped the build number (if the version is unchanged)
  • Reset the build number to 0 (if the version changed)
  • Re-rendered with the latest conda-smithy
  • Ensured the license file is being packaged.

While we are trying to look into node 10, this will take a look at what we've got today...

@conda-forge-linter
Copy link

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

@jochym
Copy link
Contributor

jochym commented Jul 19, 2018

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

recipe/meta.yaml Outdated
@@ -30,12 +30,13 @@ requirements:
- subprocess32 # [py2k]
test:
requires:
- nodejs
- nodejs >=8,<9
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably should be nodejs >=8,<10

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(that is, if you want to catch valid node versions. If you explicitly want LTS, never mind.)

@bollwyvl
Copy link
Contributor Author

bollwyvl commented Jul 19, 2018 via email

jasongrout added a commit to jasongrout/jupyterlab-feedstock that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2018
@jasongrout
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @bollwyvl! I pulled these changes into #144.

@jasongrout jasongrout closed this Oct 5, 2018
@bollwyvl
Copy link
Contributor Author

bollwyvl commented Oct 6, 2018 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants