Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

revise trademark policy #70

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 14, 2024
Merged

revise trademark policy #70

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 14, 2024

Conversation

ebullient
Copy link
Member

@ebullient ebullient requested a review from a team as a code owner February 9, 2024 04:00
@ebullient ebullient added the notice Notice (review, announcement) label Feb 9, 2024

- **Nature of Use:**
- Trademarks should be used as adjectives followed by a generic noun, not as verbs or nouns.
- Avoid using trademarks in plural or possessive forms.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks a bit silly to me. Everyone I know uses "Hibernate" as a noun all the time, and phrases such as "Hibernate's approach to xxxx" are very common.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will ask


1. You must have a policy that contributors and recipients disclose their legal or known names and company affiliations to the administrator of the funds.
- Do not use the CF Marks in a manner that would disparage the Commonhaus Foundation or its projects (e.g., untruthful advertising, false/misleading promotional materials, etc.).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Definitely NAL, but I'm surprised that this is compatible with the 1A. I mean, I understand that "untruthful advertising" and other commercial speech may be regulated, but it's not clear to me to what extent "Community Engagement" really qualifies as commercial, nor that our ownership of a TM has much bearing on that.

Pretty sure people are allowed to go on Twitter and disparage Commonhaus and Hibernate to their heart's content and there's not a damn thing we can do about it.

Is this a common thing to find in TM policies?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I linked my sources... Have more? =)

I can and will double check. The statement about untruthful materials is sound, but I'll ask with regard to other opinions. ;)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess my issue is that this is in a section titled "Use in Community Engagement". Which doesn't sound like it's really directly about commercial speech.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good point. Let me chew on it

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It indeed makes more sense in the section you moved it to.

@ebullient ebullient merged commit 89de135 into main Feb 14, 2024
2 checks passed
@ebullient ebullient deleted the trademark branch February 14, 2024 14:17
@ebullient
Copy link
Member Author

Merged as baseline to move forward.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
notice Notice (review, announcement)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants