Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

test: add back no printable characters test since is valid test #3991

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

test: add back no printable characters test since is valid test #3991

wants to merge 1 commit into from
+6 −6

Conversation

ShueiYang
Copy link

@ShueiYang ShueiYang commented Feb 17, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Re-enables the previously commented-out test for non-printable characters. The test remains valid and ensures proper handling of such cases. (unless this behaviour is not intended) No changes were made to the test logic, only reactivating it.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Enhanced email validation by activating additional invalid cases.
    • Expanded tests to verify correct handling of identifier formats (e.g., unique string IDs).
    • Updated validations for date, time, datetime, regex, and duration to ensure proper rejection of invalid inputs.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 17, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

This pull request updates string validation tests by reactivating previously commented-out invalid email cases in two test files. In one file, additional test cases have been added for validating identifier formats (UUID, nanoid, cuid, cuid2, ulid) as well as regex patterns and date/time-related formats. The changes adjust the test inputs to ensure that invalid formats are actively rejected, while valid cases are parsed correctly. There are no changes to the declarations of exported or public entities.

Changes

File(s) Modified Change Summary
deno/.../string.test.ts, src/.../string.test.ts Updated email validation tests by uncommenting three invalid email cases (user%example.com@example.org, mailhost!username@example.org, test/test@test.com) to be actively tested.
deno/.../string.test.ts Added new test cases for UUID, nanoid, cuid, cuid2, ulid validations and updated tests for regex, datetime, date, time, and duration parsing to validate both valid and invalid input formats along with error messaging.

Poem

I’m hopping through the code so neat,
Where email tests now tap their feet.
UUIDs and nanoids join the race,
Cuid and ulid keep up the pace.
With every test case crisp and clear,
This rabbit cheers for changes here! 🐇✨

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e308703 and 524bcd3.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • deno/lib/__tests__/string.test.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/__tests__/string.test.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/__tests__/string.test.ts (1)

73-75: LGTM! Re-enabling these test cases improves validation coverage.

The uncommented test cases are valid additions that help ensure proper rejection of email addresses containing special characters. This aligns with the PR's objective of re-enabling non-printable character tests.

deno/lib/__tests__/string.test.ts (1)

74-76: LGTM! Re-enabling these test cases improves email validation coverage.

The uncommented test cases are valid examples of invalid email addresses that should be rejected. They specifically test the handling of invalid characters (%, !, /) in the local part of email addresses.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@netlify Netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Feb 17, 2025 •
edited
Loading

✅ Deploy Preview for guileless-rolypoly-866f8a ready!

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 524bcd3
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/guileless-rolypoly-866f8a/deploys/67b30dac8089b50008453543
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-3991--guileless-rolypoly-866f8a.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@ShueiYang