Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding prescale index and L1 tables with per-type data #9301

Merged

Conversation

avetisya
Copy link
Contributor

This adds the prescale index (as seen by the CMSSW framework) and L1 tables split by Physics, Calibration and Random. The prescale index is currently passes the "sample" operation to hltd and the transfer system so the latter will take it from a random file. The functionality to compare across all files and verify that it is the same is not currently present, although this is done in the CMSSW code so at least if it changes for the same process, we will know.

There were also a few changes to clean up the code and remove some ambiguities. The iSummary variables are now explicitly initialized at the beginning of each lumi section. Also, L1Accept is now L1AlgoAccept to clarify that this is for the algorithm bits only rather than all bits.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @avetisya for CMSSW_7_4_X.

Adding prescale index and L1 tables with per-type data

It involves the following packages:

HLTrigger/JSONMonitoring

@Martin-Grunewald, @perrotta, @cmsbuild, @nclopezo, @fwyzard can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@@ -26,10 +26,10 @@ TriggerJSONMonitoring::TriggerJSONMonitoring(const edm::ParameterSet& ps)

triggerResultsToken_ = consumes<edm::TriggerResults>(triggerResults_);

if (ps.exists("L1Results")) level1Results_ = ps.getParameter<edm::InputTag>("L1Results"); //DS
else level1Results_ = edm::InputTag("hltGtDigis"); //DS
if (ps.exists("L1Results")) level1Results_ = ps.getParameter<edm::InputTag>("L1Results");
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Putting the proper value into the fillDescriptions(), the ps.exists is not needed!
Like-wise for the other ps.exists!

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_4_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_4_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor

Hi Aram @avetisya
Please make a PR for 75X as well, as 74X PRs are no longer forward ported as of today (ORP meeting).

@avetisya
Copy link
Contributor Author

avetisya commented Jun 4, 2015

Hi Martin,

The 75X version is #9441 .

-- Aram

@Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor

@avetisya
Thanks!

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants