Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[14_1_X] Era for UPC re-reco of 2016 pPb data #46347

Merged

Conversation

stahlleiton
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Backport of #46087

PR validation:

Tested using the relvals 180,180.1,181,181.1,141.901,142.901,142.903

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 11, 2024

A new Pull Request was created by @stahlleiton for CMSSW_14_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

  • Configuration/AlCa (alca)
  • Configuration/Eras (operations)
  • Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (upgrade, pdmv)
  • Configuration/StandardSequences (operations)
  • RecoHI/HiTracking (reconstruction)
  • RecoTracker/IterativeTracking (reconstruction)
  • RecoVertex/PrimaryVertexProducer (reconstruction)

@AdrianoDee, @Moanwar, @antoniovilela, @atpathak, @cmsbuild, @consuegs, @davidlange6, @fabiocos, @jfernan2, @kskovpen, @mandrenguyen, @miquork, @perrotta, @rappoccio, @srimanob, @subirsarkar, @sunilUIET can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@AnnikaStein, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @Martin-Grunewald, @VinInn, @VourMa, @dgulhan, @fabiocos, @felicepantaleo, @gpetruc, @jazzitup, @kurtejung, @makortel, @mandrenguyen, @martinamalberti, @missirol, @mmusich, @mtosi, @rovere, @rsreds, @sameasy, @slomeo, @tocheng, @yenjie, @yetkinyilmaz, @yuanchao this is something you requested to watch as well.
@antoniovilela, @mandrenguyen, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 11, 2024

cms-bot internal usage

@mandrenguyen
Copy link
Contributor

backport of #46087

@mandrenguyen
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 84KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a309a2/42117/summary.html
COMMIT: cd837b2
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_1_X_2024-10-10-2300/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/46347/42117/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially added 1 lines to the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 45
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3437821
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3437801
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 44 files compared)
  • Checked 195 log files, 166 edm output root files, 45 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@AdrianoDee
Copy link
Contributor

+pdmv

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+alca

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@Moanwar
Copy link
Contributor

Moanwar commented Oct 11, 2024

+Upgrade

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

@mandrenguyen this is also fully signed: could you please merge?

@mandrenguyen
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_14_1_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_14_2_X is complete. This pull request will be automatically merged.

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 5afb930 into cms-sw:CMSSW_14_1_X Oct 15, 2024
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants