Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DB] Ad a small feature to DT calibration payloads dumper #46224

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 4, 2024

Conversation

battibass
Copy link

PR description:

Adda to a dumper program, used to perform checks on DT conditions, the possibility to inspect payloads tagged with specific labels.

PR validation:

This change does not affect any central workflow. The code compiles and the new feature was tested by dumping a small set of DT conditions.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 3, 2024

cms-bot internal usage

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 3, 2024

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 3, 2024

A new Pull Request was created by @battibass for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • CalibMuon/DTCalibration (alca)

@atpathak, @cmsbuild, @consuegs, @perrotta can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mmusich, @rsreds, @tocheng, @yuanchao this is something you requested to watch as well.
@antoniovilela, @mandrenguyen, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@battibass battibass changed the title [DB] Ad a small feature DT calibration dumper [DB] Ad a small feature to DT calibration payloads dumper Oct 3, 2024
@@ -38,28 +38,32 @@ DumpDBToFile::DumpDBToFile(const ParameterSet& pset) {
if (format != "Legacy" && format != "DTRecoConditions")
throw cms::Exception("IncorrectSetup") << "Parameter format is not valid, check the cfg file" << endl;

auto esConsumesByLabel = [&](auto& token) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since you are naming it now, why not something like

Suggested change
auto esConsumesByLabel = [&](auto& token) {
auto esConsumesWithLabel = [&](auto& token) {

(in order not to get confused with the old fashioned getByLabel)?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @perrotta, done!

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 3, 2024

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 3, 2024

Pull request #46224 was updated. @atpathak, @cmsbuild, @consuegs, @perrotta can you please check and sign again.

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Oct 3, 2024

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 3, 2024

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-ef297d/41914/summary.html
COMMIT: cda07a5
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_2_X_2024-10-03-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/46224/41914/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 103 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 44
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3331336
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 3234
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3328082
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 43 files compared)
  • Checked 193 log files, 163 edm output root files, 44 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Oct 4, 2024

+alca

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 4, 2024

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy, @mandrenguyen, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@mandrenguyen
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants