Adding Phase2 tracker T36, T37 and T38 (for IT studies)

[Raffaella07]

PR description:

This PR introduces three new phase-2 Tracker layouts as presented in:
https://indico.cern.ch/event/1344694/contributions/5725063/attachments/2775549/4836942/DPG_TrackerSim_updates.pdf

• T36 merges previous developments on TFPX yawned geometry (T30, introduced in Phase2 tracker: add T30 (geometry with more realistic TFPX) #36660) and TBPX split sensors (T33, introduced in Phase 2 tracker: realistic description of 3D modules in inner tracker #41880, fixed as T33/T35 in Phase2 Tracker: fixed geometries T33/T35 #43712 )
• T37 inherits from T36 + the Z+ and Z- rods of TBPX layers are shifted of 0.7 mm each towards the endcaps.
• T38 inherits from T36 + the Z+ and Z- rods of TBPX layers are shifted of 1.3 mm each towards the endcaps.

T36:
Geometry scenario: 2026D111.
Workflows: 300xx .0

T37:
Geometry scenario: 2026D112.
Workflows: 304xx.0

T38:
Geometry scenario: 2026D113.
Workflows: 308xx.0

PR validation:

• Checked XMLs make sense from Tracker design point of view
• Checked workflow numbering
• Checked that workflows with scenarios D111, D112 and D113 run smoothly with no errors
• Warnings on L1NNCaloTauEmulator - BrokenTowers (step2) DQMGenericClient:postProcessorHLTmuonTracking@endRun (step4). Should not depend on tracker geometry, same exact warnings are present in D108 (tested wf 28824) in clean CMSSW_14_1_pre2.

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

not a backport

@emiglior @mmusich @bsunanda @sroychow @ FYI

[cmsbuild]

@Raffaella07, CMSSW_14_1_X branch is closed for direct updates. cms-bot is going to move this PR to master branch.
In future, please use cmssw master branch to submit your changes.

[cmsbuild]

cms-bot internal usage

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-44765/39982

• This PR adds an extra 468KB to repository

• Found files with invalid states:

  • Geometry/TrackerCommonData/data/PhaseII/Tracker_DD4hep_compatible_OT806_IT741_2024_01/trackerParameters.xml:
    • Added: 535c380
    • Deleted: 6735875

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

  • File Configuration/AlCa/python/autoCondPhase2.py modified in PR(s): [Dummy] Try creating big-enough cache to cause splitting #44368
  • File Configuration/Geometry/README.md modified in PR(s): introducing BigPixel for phase-2 InnerTracker in T39 geometry #44576
  • File Configuration/Geometry/python/GeometryDD4hepExtended2026D111Reco_cff.py modified in PR(s): introducing BigPixel for phase-2 InnerTracker in T39 geometry #44576
  • File Configuration/Geometry/python/GeometryDD4hepExtended2026D111_cff.py modified in PR(s): introducing BigPixel for phase-2 InnerTracker in T39 geometry #44576
  • File Configuration/Geometry/python/GeometryExtended2026D111Reco_cff.py modified in PR(s): introducing BigPixel for phase-2 InnerTracker in T39 geometry #44576
  • File Configuration/Geometry/python/GeometryExtended2026D111_cff.py modified in PR(s): introducing BigPixel for phase-2 InnerTracker in T39 geometry #44576
  • File Configuration/Geometry/python/dict2026Geometry.py modified in PR(s): introducing BigPixel for phase-2 InnerTracker in T39 geometry #44576
  • File Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/relval_2026.py modified in PR(s): introducing BigPixel for phase-2 InnerTracker in T39 geometry #44576, Support for Phase-2 mkFit initialStep track building #44708
  • File Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/upgradeWorkflowComponents.py modified in PR(s): Add run3 tracking low pu era #33532, add Era_Run3_2024, Era_Run3_2025, Tier0 reco scenario for 2024, and change default era in PyReleaseValidation #43761, Alpaka vs CUDA DQM compare modules for pixel tracks objects #43964, introducing BigPixel for phase-2 InnerTracker in T39 geometry #44576, Support for Phase-2 mkFit initialStep track building #44708
  • File Configuration/StandardSequences/python/GeometryConf.py modified in PR(s): introducing BigPixel for phase-2 InnerTracker in T39 geometry #44576
  • File Geometry/CMSCommonData/data/dd4hep/cmsExtendedGeometry2026D111.xml modified in PR(s): introducing BigPixel for phase-2 InnerTracker in T39 geometry #44576
  • File Geometry/CMSCommonData/python/cmsExtendedGeometry2026D111XML_cfi.py modified in PR(s): introducing BigPixel for phase-2 InnerTracker in T39 geometry #44576

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @Raffaella07 for master.

It involves the following packages:

• Configuration/AlCa (alca)
• Configuration/Geometry (geometry, upgrade)
• Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (pdmv, upgrade)
• Configuration/StandardSequences (operations)
• Geometry/CMSCommonData (geometry, upgrade)
• Geometry/TrackerCommonData (geometry)
• Geometry/TrackerNumberingBuilder (geometry)
• Geometry/TrackerRecoData (geometry)
• Geometry/TrackerSimData (geometry)

@antoniovilela, @subirsarkar, @saumyaphor4252, @rappoccio, @bsunanda, @makortel, @davidlange6, @civanch, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @cmsbuild, @mdhildreth, @sunilUIET, @fabiocos, @miquork, @Dr15Jones, @perrotta, @consuegs can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mtosi, @rsreds, @slomeo, @missirol, @Martin-Grunewald, @VinInn, @mmusich, @ghugo83, @tocheng, @sameasy, @rovere, @JanFSchulte, @vargasa, @felicepantaleo, @venturia, @bsunanda, @dgulhan, @yuanchao, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @makortel, @VourMa, @fabiocos this is something you requested to watch as well.
@rappoccio, @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[mmusich]

test parameters:

• workflow_opts = -w upgrade
• workflows = 22034.0, 30034 .0, 30434.0, 30034.0

[mmusich]

@cmsbuild, please test

[mmusich]

@cmsbuild, please abort

[emiglior]

about the potential conflicts with PR 44576, my preference would be to give higher priority to this PR (44765)

[perrotta]

+alca

[srimanob]

+Upgrade

[civanch]

+1

[AdrianoDee]

+pdmv

[emiglior]

Hi, as providing these geometries is one of the items to be reported at the forthcoming TK Annual Review (Apr 29th) it would be really nice to have the PR fully signed by then...

[mmusich]

@cms-sw/orp-l2 your signature is required here.

[rappoccio]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged.