-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Alpaka Implementation of PFClusterProducer #43130
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43130/37401
|
A new Pull Request was created by @jsamudio for master. It involves the following packages:
The following packages do not have a category, yet: RecoParticleFlow/PFClusterProducerAlpaka @syuvivida, @antoniovilela, @cmsbuild, @fabiocos, @tjavaid, @rappoccio, @jfernan2, @antoniovagnerini, @rvenditti, @davidlange6, @mandrenguyen, @nothingface0 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
type pf |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Cursory look up to RecoParticleFlow/PFClusterProducerAlpaka/plugins/alpaka/PFClusterProducerAlpaka.cc
.
One question I have is if the new package is really necessary? (I haven't digested the code enough to form an opinion though)
DataFormats/ParticleFlowReco/interface/alpaka/CaloRecHitDeviceCollection.h
Show resolved
Hide resolved
RecoParticleFlow/PFClusterProducerAlpaka/plugins/alpaka/PFClusterProducerAlpaka.cc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
RecoParticleFlow/PFClusterProducerAlpaka/plugins/alpaka/PFClusterProducerKernel.dev.cc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
RecoParticleFlow/PFClusterProducerAlpaka/plugins/AlpakaPFCommon.h
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
RecoParticleFlow/PFClusterProducerAlpaka/interface/alpaka/PFClusterProducerKernel.h
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
RecoParticleFlow/PFClusterProducerAlpaka/plugins/alpaka/PFClusterProducerAlpaka.cc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43130/37422
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
assign heterogeneous |
@jsamudio re-run the code-format? |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43130/37438
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43130/38127
|
Pull request #43130 was updated. @rvenditti, @antoniovagnerini, @fwyzard, @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen, @tjavaid, @nothingface0, @cmsbuild, @makortel, @syuvivida can you please check and sign again. |
+heterogeneous |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b729dc/36418/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+reconstruction |
@cms-sw/dqm-l2 , could you please review or sign this PR ? |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
This pull request is a follow up to #42807. It adds SoA formats for PFClusters and PFRecHitFractions as well as an Alpaka based producer for them. The module relies on the usage of the PFRecHitProducer introduced in the #42807.
Included is an alpaka process modifier to use for cmsDriver commands.Once the changes in #43229 are merged, we will use--procModifiers alpaka
will replace the existing HCAL PF clustering with a chain using alpaka modules.--procModifiers alpaka
to replace existing HCAL PF clustering with the alpaka equivalents. We plan an additional follow up to read HCAL thresholds from DB in this module once the changes in #43025 converge.PR validation:
We have performed extensive validation of the PF Clusters and their use in the full PF Validation outlined in
Validation/RecoParticleFlow/
.We observe only minor precision based energy differences in the clusters which have no significant impact to relevant PF outputs.
Validation plots are linked here: https://hep.baylor.edu/jsamudio/pfClusterProducerAlpakaValidation/
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
PR is not a backport.
@hatakeyamak