[13.2.X] Support HLT tracks in alignment validation

[mmusich]

backport of #42302

PR description:

It is in the plans to start using hltMergedTracks from the SteamHLTMonitor PD in the tracker alignment procedure in order to minimize the drift between the derived alignment correction / validations and their actual usage in production (at the HLT).
This PR proposes a couple of minimal fixes in order to be able to run the standard setup.
There are two commits:

• 829f188 supports the hltMergedTracks collection in the common track selection and refitting sequence
• 7a12d5f supports the SiStripMatchedRecHit2D and ProjectedSiStripRecHit2D collections in TrackerTrackHitFilter. Encountering hits from either of these two collections was leading to a runtime exception of the type:

----- Begin Fatal Exception 05-Jul-2023 19:33:49 CEST-----------------------
An exception of category 'Unknown RecHit Type' occurred while
   [0] Processing  Event run: 370102 lumi: 668 event: 1557577232 stream: 0
   [1] Running path 'p'
   [2] Calling method for module TrackerTrackHitFilter/'TrackerTrackHitFilter'
   
Exception Message:
RecHit of type 22SiStripMatchedRecHit2D not supported. (use c++filt to demangle the name)
----- End Fatal Exception -------------------------------------------------

These two collections (as the previously stated in the removed comment) did not happen anymore since CMSSW > 2_0_X because of hit splitting in stereo modules in offline reconstruction, but in HLT tracking stereo hit splitting is not performed.
In order to cope with the SiStripMatchedRecHit2D, the cut on the S/N is performed by taking the average of the stereo and mono hits.

PR validation:

Tested the minimal configuration provided by @henriettepetersen (available here).

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Verbatim backport of #42302

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for CMSSW_13_2_X.

It involves the following packages:

• Alignment/CommonAlignment (alca)
• RecoTracker/FinalTrackSelectors (reconstruction)

@perrotta, @consuegs, @clacaputo, @cmsbuild, @saumyaphor4252, @tvami, @mandrenguyen, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@pakhotin, @VourMa, @adewit, @felicepantaleo, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @JanFSchulte, @tocheng, @VinInn, @missirol, @rovere, @tlampen, @gpetruc, @mmusich, @mtosi, @dgulhan this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

• Backported from Support HLT tracks in alignment validation #42302

[mmusich]

test parameters:

• addpkg = Alignment/OfflineValidation
• workflows = 1001.2, 1001.3

[mmusich]

@cmsbuild, please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-68910f/33891/summary.html
COMMIT: 7a12d5f
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_2_X_2023-07-25-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/42367/33891/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• You potentially removed 3 lines from the logs
• Reco comparison results: 5 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 50
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3210569
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 3
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3210544
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 49 files compared)
• Checked 218 log files, 161 edm output root files, 50 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[tvami]

+1

[mmusich]

@cms-sw/reconstruction-l2 ping (here and in the other backports)

[mandrenguyen]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_13_2_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_13_3_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[perrotta]

+1