-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ROOT6] Fix int type in NanoAD plugins for ROOT6 IB #40545
[ROOT6] Fix int type in NanoAD plugins for ROOT6 IB #40545
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @aandvalenzuela (Andrea Valenzuela) for CMSSW_13_0_ROOT6_X. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @swertz, @vlimant can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
type bug-fix |
Thank you @aandvalenzuela ! |
That was 18 months ago... Is still valid?
On Jan 17, 2023 4:00 PM, Malik Shahzad Muzaffar ***@***.***> wrote:
@perrotta<https://github.com/perrotta> , see #33825<#33825>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#40545 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABGPFQ7I4PTZZDN4VPYXZ5TWSZYAVANCNFSM6AAAAAAT5UNQMY>.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
yes @davidlange6 , these changes are still only in ROOT6 cmssw branch. I have opened #40547 to backport those to cmssw master |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-afd364/30028/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 AFAIK there is no test of the RNTuple output module, because of some still missing feature (backfilling). But the fix makes sense given the changes introduced in #40478 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_13_0_ROOT6_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_13_0_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
Hello,
Last ROOT6 IB was failing at compilation after the merge of #40478. The issue was not catch during the PR testing since the file where this error happens (
PhysicsTools/NanoAOD/plugins/TableOutputFields.cc
) is only part of ROOT6 branch.This PR is to propose a solution by changing the type to
Int32
. As for the testing, I have created a development area with the latest ROOT6 IB to then apply these changes on top, and the modulePhysicsTools/NanoAOD
builds fine.Thanks,
Andrea.