Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ROOT6] Fix int type in NanoAD plugins for ROOT6 IB #40545

Merged

Conversation

aandvalenzuela
Copy link
Contributor

Hello,

Last ROOT6 IB was failing at compilation after the merge of #40478. The issue was not catch during the PR testing since the file where this error happens (PhysicsTools/NanoAOD/plugins/TableOutputFields.cc) is only part of ROOT6 branch.

This PR is to propose a solution by changing the type to Int32. As for the testing, I have created a development area with the latest ROOT6 IB to then apply these changes on top, and the module PhysicsTools/NanoAOD builds fine.
Thanks,

Andrea.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @aandvalenzuela (Andrea Valenzuela) for CMSSW_13_0_ROOT6_X.

It involves the following packages:

  • PhysicsTools/NanoAOD (xpog)

@cmsbuild, @swertz, @vlimant can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@gpetruc this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@swertz
Copy link
Contributor

swertz commented Jan 17, 2023

please test

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

type bug-fix

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you @aandvalenzuela !
Out of curiosity: can someone explain me why this code is only present in the ROOT6 branch?

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

@perrotta , see #33825

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

davidlange6 commented Jan 17, 2023 via email

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

yes @davidlange6 , these changes are still only in ROOT6 cmssw branch. I have opened #40547 to backport those to cmssw master

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-afd364/30028/summary.html
COMMIT: 9524559
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_0_ROOT6_X_2023-01-16-2300/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/40545/30028/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
  • Reco comparison results: 6 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3555538
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 3
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3555513
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • Checked 211 log files, 162 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@swertz
Copy link
Contributor

swertz commented Jan 17, 2023

+1

AFAIK there is no test of the RNTuple output module, because of some still missing feature (backfilling). But the fix makes sense given the changes introduced in #40478

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_13_0_ROOT6_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_13_0_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 59f6c23 into cms-sw:CMSSW_13_0_ROOT6_X Jan 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants