Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HLT Tau DQM from MiniAOD #39651

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

slehti
Copy link
Contributor

@slehti slehti commented Oct 6, 2022

PR description:

Adding support for running HLT Tau DQM on MiniAOD (PAT) samples so that a larger set of tau discriminators is available for the reference object selection.

PR validation:

Checked that the reference objects are the same for RECO and MiniAOD input.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 6, 2022

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39651/32451

  • This PR adds an extra 52KB to repository

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 6, 2022

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39651/32452

  • This PR adds an extra 52KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 6, 2022

A new Pull Request was created by @slehti for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • DQMOffline/Trigger (dqm)
  • HLTriggerOffline/Tau (dqm)

@emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @syuvivida, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mtosi, @Fedespring, @missirol, @HuguesBrun, @jhgoh, @trocino, @cericeci, @rociovilar this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@emanueleusai
Copy link
Member

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 7, 2022

-1

Failed Tests: RelVals
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-863b3b/28095/summary.html
COMMIT: 9fbf715
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_6_X_2022-10-06-2300/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/39651/28095/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

RelVals

----- Begin Fatal Exception 07-Oct-2022 10:07:20 CEST-----------------------
An exception of category 'Configuration' occurred while
   [0] Constructing the EventProcessor
   [1] Constructing module: class=HLTTauRefProducer label='TauRelvalRefProducer'
Exception Message:
MissingParameter: The required ParameterSet 'Taus' was not specified.
----- End Fatal Exception -------------------------------------------------
----- Begin Fatal Exception 07-Oct-2022 10:07:34 CEST-----------------------
An exception of category 'Configuration' occurred while
   [0] Constructing the EventProcessor
   [1] Constructing module: class=HLTTauRefProducer label='TauRelvalRefProducer'
Exception Message:
MissingParameter: The required ParameterSet 'Taus' was not specified.
----- End Fatal Exception -------------------------------------------------
----- Begin Fatal Exception 07-Oct-2022 10:08:02 CEST-----------------------
An exception of category 'Configuration' occurred while
   [0] Constructing the EventProcessor
   [1] Constructing module: class=HLTTauRefProducer label='TauRelvalRefProducer'
Exception Message:
MissingParameter: The required ParameterSet 'Taus' was not specified.
----- End Fatal Exception -------------------------------------------------
Expand to see more relval errors ...

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 7, 2022

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39651/32480

  • This PR adds an extra 52KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 7, 2022

Pull request #39651 was updated. @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @syuvivida, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again.

@emanueleusai
Copy link
Member

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-863b3b/28164/summary.html
COMMIT: 9e3438c
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_6_X_2022-10-10-2300/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/39651/28164/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • /pool/condor/dir_35162/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-863b3b/41834.0_TTbar_14TeV+2026D94+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCP5_GenSimHLBeamSpot14+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+HARVESTGlobal

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 7 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3392309
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 90
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3392197
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • Checked 204 log files, 49 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@emanueleusai
Copy link
Member

@slehti there's several differences in the DQM plots in JetMET/METValidation and JetValidation that do not seem compatible with the description of the PR. Do you understand where those differences are coming from?
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/baseLineComparisons/CMSSW_12_6_X_2022-10-10-2300+863b3b/53314/39500.0_CloseByPGun_CE_H_Coarse_Scint+2026D88+CE_H_Coarse_Scint_GenSimHLBeamSpotHGCALCloseBy+DigiTrigger+RecoGlobal+HARVESTGlobal/JetMET_JetValidation_ak4PFJets.html

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor

there's several differences in the DQM plots in JetMET/METValidation and JetValidation that do not seem compatible with the description of the PR. Do you understand where those differences are coming from?

Unexpected differences in JetMET/{Jet,MET}Validation in phase2 workflows are seen in some other PRs as well, see issue #39754.

@slehti
Copy link
Contributor Author

slehti commented Oct 18, 2022

The HLT Tau DQM should not affect JetMET/METValidation and JetValidation in any way. Changes if any should only be in the HLT Tau DQM plots.
I do not understand those differences, and the PR is not touching JetMET/METValidation or JetValidation code.

@slehti slehti closed this Oct 19, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants