[12.4.X] supply DQM for SiPixelCalSingleMuonTight

[mmusich]

backport of #39382

PR description:

With the foreseen increase of isolated muon trigger rates (see https://its.cern.ch/jira/browse/CMSHLT-2465 ) it becomes possible to run the SiPixelCalSingleMuonTight at express, allowing for quasi-online efficiency monitoring.
This PR adds a stub of DQM monitor for that AlCa flavour to start producing basic cluster properties histograms that are used as ingredients of the hit efficiency measurement.

PR validation:

Run

 runTheMatrix.py -l 1002.4 -t 4 -j 8 --iboes

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

verbatim backport of #39382, needed for data-taking monitoring purposes.

[mmusich]

type trk, new-feature

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for CMSSW_12_4_X.

It involves the following packages:

• Configuration/StandardSequences (operations)
• DQMOffline/CalibTracker (dqm)
• DQMOffline/Configuration (dqm)

@perrotta, @rappoccio, @pmandrik, @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @syuvivida, @davidlange6, @micsucmed, @fabiocos, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@fabiocos, @VourMa, @makortel, @felicepantaleo, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @JanFSchulte, @rovere, @VinInn, @Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @lecriste, @mtosi, @mmusich, @threus, @dgulhan, @slomeo, @rociovilar this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

• Backported from supply DQM for SiPixelCalSingleMuonTight #39382

[mmusich]

test parameters:

• workflow = 1002.4

[mmusich]

please test

[mmusich]

urgent

• would be good to have for data-taking when collisions resume.

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-dbb9eb/27509/summary.html
COMMIT: 157c785
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-09-13-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/39386/27509/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

• /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-dbb9eb/1002.4_RunDoubleMuon2022B+RunDoubleMuon2022B+TIER0PROMPTRUN3+HARVESTPROMPTRUN3

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 8 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 51
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3779336
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 19
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 3
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3779292
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 4.93 KiB( 50 files compared)
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 1000.0,... ): 2.455 KiB AlCaReco/SiPixelCalSingleMuonTight
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 1000.0,... ): 0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Errors
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 1000.0,... ): 0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
• Checked 211 log files, 45 edm output root files, 51 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: found differences in 2 / 50 workflows

[emanueleusai]

+1

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #39386 was updated. @perrotta, @rappoccio, @pmandrik, @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @syuvivida, @davidlange6, @micsucmed, @fabiocos, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again.

[mmusich]

@cmsbuild, please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-dbb9eb/27554/summary.html
COMMIT: cbf0127
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-09-14-2300/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/39386/27554/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

• /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-dbb9eb/1002.4_RunDoubleMuon2022B+RunDoubleMuon2022B+TIER0PROMPTRUN3+HARVESTPROMPTRUN3

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 51
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3779336
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 8
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 2
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3779304
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 4.926 KiB( 50 files compared)
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 1002.4,... ): 2.455 KiB AlCaReco/SiPixelCalSingleMuonTight
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 1002.4,... ): 0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Errors
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 1002.4,... ): 0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
• Checked 211 log files, 45 edm output root files, 51 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: found differences in 2 / 50 workflows

[francescobrivio]

@cms-sw/dqm-l2 has this been tested in P5?
Although, as far as I understood, this should only affect offline dqm to allow extra monitoring at Express-level.

[mmusich]

has this been tested in P5?

testing in the online DQM serves no purpose at all as this is run only in the offline DQM.

[rovere]

Could @cms-sw/dqm-l2 please review and sign again this PR?

[emanueleusai]

+1

[perrotta]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_4_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_6_X is complete. This pull request will be automatically merged.