-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix bug in muon index bit computation #38532
Conversation
We were previously only doing the data format based assignment for BMTF muons. This is now extended to also OMTF and EMTF muons.
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-38532/30765
|
A new Pull Request was created by @dinyar (Dinyar Rabady) for master. It involves the following packages:
@epalencia, @cmsbuild, @cecilecaillol, @rekovic can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-ace95f/25862/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Hi @cecilecaillol, @epalencia, Is this (and the backports) fine to go in? Also reminder to @pmendrik that it would be great if this could go into the online DQM (it doesn't need to go in before 5 July as it only affects cosmic running). Finally attn @vukasinmilosevic as it fixes L1T DQM data-emu comparisons. Cheers, |
+l1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
We were previously only doing the data format-based assignment for BMTF muons. This is now extended to also OMTF and EMTF muons. This will mostly have an effect on the DQM, removing uGMT data-emulator mismatches during cosmics data taking. (cc @pmandrik; I will also create backports to 12_4_X and 12_3_X imminently and would request deployment to the online DQM if everything is fine.)
PR validation:
Ran on RAW data locally and confirmed that the index bit mismatches went away.