-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Associated PF for Egamma in 2018 PbPb miniAOD #37262
Conversation
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37262/28885
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37262/28887
|
A new Pull Request was created by @ttrk (Kaya Tatar) for master. It involves the following packages:
@jpata, @cmsbuild, @clacaputo, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT RelVals-INPUTThe relvals timed out after 4 hours. Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
Hi @smuzaffar , it is not clear to me whether the time out error is related to the PR or to jenkins |
@clacaputo , timeout is not related to this PR. the Relval INPUT tests try to run all workflows step1 . Looks like due to network issue that test timedout of 4 hour ( https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-relvals/17127/ ). I would suggest to ignore this error |
test parameters:
|
@cmsbuild please test |
Pull request #37262 was updated. @jpata, @cmsbuild, @clacaputo, @slava77 can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f7117e/23998/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+reconstruction
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f7117e/24172/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
+1 |
Description
PF candidate association is necessary for a GED electron/photon to avoid double counting energy in PF isolation.
In AOD, the association is stored in
particleBasedIsolation
object. In miniAOD, association is accessible viaassociatedPackedPFCandidates()
of a pat electron/photon (e.g. here), the AOD-2-miniAOD process transfers the association between objects.Currently, the transfer does not work correctly for 2018 PbPb data, i.e.
run2_miniAOD_pp_on_AA_103X
process. This is understood as packedPFcandidates in this workflow is made from an intermediate, "cleaned" PF collection (introduced via PR) and while references inparticleBasedIsolation
are still the ones from original PF collection. TheassociatedPackedPFCandidates
collection created in current workflow is not correct.This PR fixes the problem by producing a map between original (old) and the cleaned (new) PF candidate references and updating the references in
particleBasedIsolation
from old to new ones.Validation
Tests pass wf 140.5611 and give correct output.
@mandrenguyen