-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ECAL DQM - Add WF .513 for ECAL GPU vs. CPU validation #37123
Changes from 4 commits
adbbc2c
0a4399f
83b357f
6553266
f9271b0
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -679,7 +679,22 @@ def setup_(self, step, stepName, stepDict, k, properties): | |
offset = 0.512, | ||
) | ||
|
||
# add here a .513 workflow for GPU vs CPU validation | ||
upgradeWFs['PatatrackECALOnlyGPUValidation'] = PatatrackWorkflow( | ||
digi = { | ||
'--accelerators': 'gpu-nvidia', | ||
'--procModifiers': 'gpu,gpuValidationEcal' | ||
}, | ||
reco = { | ||
'-s': 'RAW2DIGI:RawToDigi_ecalOnly,RECO:reconstruction_ecalOnly,VALIDATION:@ecalOnlyValidation,DQM:@ecalOnly', | ||
'--accelerators': 'gpu-nvidia', | ||
'--procModifiers': 'gpu,gpuValidationEcal' | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. That one would also include the HCAL validation modifier. And maybe others in the future. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yes, that's the idea. Then, since this workflow only runs the ECAL reconstruction and validation, only those two are customised. |
||
}, | ||
harvest = { | ||
'-s': 'HARVESTING:@ecalOnlyValidation+@ecal' | ||
}, | ||
suffix = 'Patatrack_ECALOnlyGPU_Validation', | ||
offset = 0.513, | ||
) | ||
|
||
upgradeWFs['PatatrackECALOnlyGPUProfiling'] = PatatrackWorkflow( | ||
digi = { | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
gpuValidationEcal
is not needed here, because I don't think we run any validation in the DIGI stepThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Probably not.