Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ALCA_RECONSTRUCTION] [PY3] Fix needed for python3: Use of subprocess instead of commands #35825

Merged

Conversation

smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

use python3, replace commands with subprocess as reported in #35646

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35825/26187

  • This PR adds an extra 60KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar (Malik Shahzad Muzaffar) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • RecoVertex/BeamSpotProducer (reconstruction, alca)

@malbouis, @yuanchao, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @jpata, @tvami, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@GiacomoSguazzoni, @JanFSchulte, @rovere, @VinInn, @tocheng, @mmusich, @mtosi, @dgulhan, @francescobrivio this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Failed Tests: RelVals
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-48c358/19896/summary.html
COMMIT: 6ea576b
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-10-24-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/35825/19896/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

RelVals

----- Begin Fatal Exception 25-Oct-2021 11:12:03 CEST-----------------------
An exception of category 'NoRecord' occurred while
   [0] Processing  Event run: 1 lumi: 1 event: 1 stream: 0
   [1] Running path 'prevalidation_step'
   [2] Prefetching for module MultiTrackValidator/'trackValidatorBuilding'
   [3] Prefetching for module TrackProducer/'detachedTripletStepTracks'
   [4] Prefetching for module TrackCandidateProducer/'detachedTripletStepTrackCandidates'
   [5] Prefetching for module FastTrackerRecHitMaskProducer/'detachedTripletStepMasks'
   [6] Prefetching for module TrackProducer/'detachedQuadStepTracks'
   [7] Prefetching for module TrackCandidateProducer/'detachedQuadStepTrackCandidates'
   [8] Prefetching for module FastTrackerRecHitMaskProducer/'detachedQuadStepMasks'
   [9] Prefetching for module TrackProducer/'lowPtTripletStepTracks'
   [10] Prefetching for module TrackCandidateProducer/'lowPtTripletStepTrackCandidates'
   [11] Prefetching for module FastTrackerRecHitMaskProducer/'lowPtTripletStepMasks'
   [12] Prefetching for module TrackProducer/'highPtTripletStepTracks'
   [13] Prefetching for module TrackCandidateProducer/'highPtTripletStepTrackCandidates'
   [14] Prefetching for module FastTrackerRecHitMaskProducer/'highPtTripletStepMasks'
   [15] Prefetching for module TrackProducer/'lowPtQuadStepTracks'
   [16] Prefetching for module TrackCandidateProducer/'lowPtQuadStepTrackCandidates'
   [17] Prefetching for module FastTrackerRecHitMaskProducer/'lowPtQuadStepMasks'
   [18] Calling method for module TrackTfClassifier/'initialStep'
Exception Message:
No "TfGraphRecord" record found in the EventSetup.

 The Record is delivered by an ESSource or ESProducer but there is no valid IOV for the synchronization value.
 Please check 
   a) if the synchronization value is reasonable and report to the hypernews if it is not.
   b) else check that all ESSources have been properly configured. 
----- End Fatal Exception -------------------------------------------------

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Oct 25, 2021

please test with #35801

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-48c358/19899/summary.html
COMMIT: 6ea576b
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-10-24-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/35825/19899/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline:
2018.1 step 1
The results for the comparisons for these workflows could be incomplete
This means most likely that the IB is having errors in the relvals.The error does NOT come from this pull request

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 40
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2751113
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 5
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2751085
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -0.004 KiB( 39 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): -0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • Checked 171 log files, 37 edm output root files, 40 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Oct 25, 2021

+alca

  • technical
  • test pass

@jpata
Copy link
Contributor

jpata commented Oct 26, 2021

+reconstruction

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants