-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Migration to DD4hep as default for all Run-3 workflows #35761
Migration to DD4hep as default for all Run-3 workflows #35761
Conversation
test parameters:
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35761/26105
|
A new Pull Request was created by @srimanob (Phat Srimanobhas) for master. It involves the following packages:
@perrotta, @malbouis, @yuanchao, @jordan-martins, @bbilin, @wajidalikhan, @tvami, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen, @qliphy, @francescobrivio, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals AddOn RelVals
AddOn Tests
Expand to see more addon errors ... |
@cmsbuild please test |
+pdmv |
I keep .912 for now, in case we will use it for Phase-2 until the migration to DD4hep is done. .911 has phase-2 option while .912 not yet since nothing in DB for Phase-2 yet. |
@civanch Could you please resign? |
Hi @civanch please also consider signing in the name of geometry too not just simulation. |
+1 |
+Upgrade I sign here first as the success of the test before the last commit. We can wait until the comparison is done before merging. Hope everything goes smoothly after IB includes it, finger crossed. |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e2ed33/19951/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
@perrotta @qliphy The change is only Run-3 DDD workflows which are updated to DD4hep. Nothing else is changed. The new .914 workflow, Run-3 with DDD, runs fine. All unit tests, including HLT, run fine. So new GT with DD4hep-base works as expected. I think we are in a good position to move, and see if something else will fail in IB because of this PR. |
+1
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged. |
PR description:
This is a PR to migrate DD4hep to be a default for Run-3 workflows.
Related issue: #35707
This PR includes:
When this PR is merged, the migration should be transparent to all users. Nothing will change in cmsDriver. No need of
--procModifier
, no change in--era
and--condition
with autoCond GT.Global Tag:
VeryForwardIdealGeometryRecord
tag to 2017 ppRef GT to (partially) fix IB failure with workflow 136.8562 and 149.0 #35828:The difference in GTs is here:
2017 realistic for ppRef5TeV https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/120X_mc2017_realistic_forppRef5TeV_v2/121X_mc2017_realistic_forppRef5TeV_v1
2021 design https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/121X_mcRun3_2021_design_v12/121X_mcRun3_2021_design_v13
2021 realistic https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/121X_mcRun3_2021_realistic_v14/121X_mcRun3_2021_realistic_v15
2021 cosmics https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/121X_mcRun3_2021cosmics_realistic_deco_v14/121X_mcRun3_2021cosmics_realistic_deco_v15
2021 heavy ion https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/121X_mcRun3_2021_realistic_HI_v14/121X_mcRun3_2021_realistic_HI_v15
2023 realistic https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/121X_mcRun3_2023_realistic_v13/121X_mcRun3_2023_realistic_v14
2024 realistic https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/121X_mcRun3_2024_realistic_v13/121X_mcRun3_2024_realistic_v14
PR validation:
runTheMatrix.py --what upgrade -l 11634.0,11634.911,11634.914 --wm init
gives proper configurations.
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
No need of backport AFAIK.