New Run3 offline GT

[francescobrivio]

PR description:

This PR introduces a new key in autoCond to store the offline reprocessing GT for Run3, announced in the AlCaDB HN.
The new GT is: 113X_dataRun3_v1
The difference wrt dataRun2 GT is: https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/113X_dataRun2_v6/113X_dataRun3_v1

The PR also introduces a new relval workflow 136.897 that consumes this new GT.
I have some questions about this new workflow for @cms-sw/pdmv-l2 :

• Is the number of the new workflow ok?
• Should we add this to the standard matrix?

Finally, I modified the names of the steps of the Prompt relval workflow (138.1) since they consume the prompt GT and they shoul not be confused with the steps of the newly introduced Run3 offline workflow.

[EDIT]
As described in JIRA/PDMVRERECO-46 the new GT has already been update to v2 to include two new payloads for SiStripApvGain_FromParticles_GR10_v12_offline and TrackerSurfaceDeformations_v13_offline.
The new GT is: 113X_dataRun3_v2
And the difference wrt to v1 is: 113X_dataRun3_v2 vs 113X_dataRun3_v1

PR validation:

Tested with: runTheMatrix.py -l 138.1,136.897 --ibeos -j4

Backport:

Once this PR is signed off we will make backports to 12_0_X and 11_3_X

[francescobrivio]

Test parameters:

• worfklows=138.1,136.897

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-35202/25141

• This PR adds an extra 56KB to repository

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

  • File Configuration/PyReleaseValidation/python/relval_steps.py modified in PR(s): Add SiStripCalCosmics ALCANANO #34985, Use pdigi_hi_nogen for HI MC wfs #35028

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @francescobrivio for master.

It involves the following packages:

• Configuration/AlCa (alca)
• Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (pdmv, upgrade)

@malbouis, @yuanchao, @jordan-martins, @chayanit, @bbilin, @wajidalikhan, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen, @francescobrivio, @tvami can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @kpedro88, @Martin-Grunewald, @tocheng, @mmusich, @fabiocos, @slomeo this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[francescobrivio]

Test parameters:

• workflows=138.1,136.897

[AdrianoDee]

test parameters:

• worflows=138.1,136.897

[francescobrivio]

@cmsbuild please test

[AdrianoDee]

please test

[francescobrivio]

test parameters:

* worflows=138.1,136.897

@AdrianoDee I'm not sure this got processed correctly by the bot due to the typo...

[AdrianoDee]

please abort

[tvami]

Test parameters:

• workflows=138.1,136.897

this would have worked

[tvami]

test parameters:

• workflows = 138.1,136.897

[tvami]

@cmsbuild , please test

[AdrianoDee]

Sorry, we perfectly crossed and I'd missed your commands.

[francescobrivio]

@cmsbuild please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-909f00/18461/summary.html
COMMIT: 62d25a3
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_1_X_2021-09-08-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/35202/18461/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

• /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-909f00/136.897_RunCosmics2021CRUZET+RunCosmics2021CRUZET+RECOCOSDRUN3+ALCACOSDRUN3+HARVESTDCRUN3

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 39
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3001001
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3000979
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 38 files compared)
• Checked 165 log files, 37 edm output root files, 39 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[tvami]

+alca

[srimanob]

+Upgrade

[kskovpen]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[perrotta]

@cms-sw/pdmv-l2 are you guys ok with the wf naming?

I take the "+1" from PDMV as a "Yes"...

[perrotta]

+1

[kskovpen]

@cms-sw/pdmv-l2 are you guys ok with the wf naming?

I take the "+1" from PDMV as a "Yes"...

Yes, sorry, was in a robot mode. Unless @bbilin and @jordan-martins think otherwise.