[12_0_X] Add HCAL tag HcalRespCorrs_2021_v3.0_mc to Run-3 MC GTs

[tvami]

PR description:

Please see description in #34922

Here is the list of differences:

• 120X_mcRun3_2021_design_v4
  Diff: https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/120X_mcRun3_2021_design_v3/120X_mcRun3_2021_design_v4
• 120X_mcRun3_2021_realistic_v5
  Diff: https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/120X_mcRun3_2021_realistic_v4/120X_mcRun3_2021_realistic_v5
• 120X_mcRun3_2021cosmics_realistic_deco_v4
  Diff: https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/120X_mcRun3_2021cosmics_realistic_deco_v3/120X_mcRun3_2021cosmics_realistic_deco_v4
• 120X_mcRun3_2021_realistic_HI_v4
  Diff: https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/120X_mcRun3_2021_realistic_HI_v3/120X_mcRun3_2021_realistic_HI_v4
• 120X_mcRun3_2023_realistic_v5
  Diff: https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/120X_mcRun3_2023_realistic_v4/120X_mcRun3_2023_realistic_v5
• 120X_mcRun3_2024_realistic_v5
  Diff: https://cms-conddb.cern.ch/cmsDbBrowser/diff/Prod/gts/120X_mcRun3_2024_realistic_v4/120X_mcRun3_2024_realistic_v5

The diffs are wrt the conditions in the master, and only show the differences in the requested tag, HcalRespCorrs_2021_v3.0_mc

if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:

backport of #34922

cc: @mseidel42 @abdoulline

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @tvami (Tamas Vami) for CMSSW_12_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

• Configuration/AlCa (alca)

@malbouis, @yuanchao, @cmsbuild, @tlampen, @pohsun, @francescobrivio, @tvami can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @mmusich, @fabiocos, @tocheng this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

• Backported from Add HCAL tag HcalRespCorrs_2021_v3.0_mc to Run-3 MC GTs #34922

[tvami]

test parameters:

• workflows = 7.23,159.0,11634.0,12434.0,12834.0

[tvami]

backport of #34922

[tvami]

@cmsbuild , please test

[abdoulline]

@tvami Thanks!

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e12615/17841/summary.html
COMMIT: 3972dac
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_0_X_2021-08-17-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/34923/17841/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

• /data/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/compare-root-files-short-matrix/data/PR-e12615/7.23_Cosmics_UP21+Cosmics_UP21+DIGICOS_UP21+RECOCOS_UP21+ALCACOS_UP21+HARVESTCOS_UP21

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 4154 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 39
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2998564
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 440
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2998101
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.004 KiB( 38 files compared)
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): 0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
• Checked 165 log files, 37 edm output root files, 39 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: found differences in 3 / 38 workflows

[tvami]

hold

• the inclusion of this PR will be discussed on Monday:
  https://indico.cern.ch/event/1066868/#14-fix-of-hcal-response-correc

[cmsbuild]

Pull request has been put on hold by @tvami
They need to issue an unhold command to remove the hold state or L1 can unhold it for all

[tvami]

unhold

• today's AlCa meeting concluded that we'd like this in this release

[perrotta]

unhold

• today's AlCa meeting concluded that we'd like this in this releasebe

Good.
As soon as the master PR will be signed by AlCa, it can be merged there. After that, also merging the backport can be considered.

[francescobrivio]

+alca

• @perrotta @qliphy we can discuss tomorrow at the ORP about merging this PR for 12_0

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_0_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_12_1_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[qliphy]

+1

[francescobrivio]

@qliphy didn't we decide at the ORP to wait for the validation before merging this PR?

[qliphy]

@francescobrivio You are right. Indeed @perrotta also just reminded me on this.
Anyway we will build the 12_0_0 release next week once we get the green light, otherwise at worst this is easy to revert. We can discuss this at next Tuesday's ORP before making 12_0_0.