-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow for increased mass precision in NanoGen + increase mass precision of SUSY particles in NanoAod #33637
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33637/22507
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mseidel42 (Markus Seidel) for master. It involves the following packages: PhysicsTools/NanoAOD @cmsbuild, @mariadalfonso, @gouskos, @fgolf can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test workflow 546,547,548 |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b308c4/14891/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
Increase mass precision for SUSY particles, as requested by @mariadalfonso, following HN post here: https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/physTools/3773.html Change could not be tested locally, hope there is some ttbar NanoAod ouput file that we can check afterwards? |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33637/22570
|
Pull request #33637 was updated. @cmsbuild, @mariadalfonso, @gouskos, @fgolf can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
@mseidel42 please update the title as well (it's not only nanoGEN now) and add the hn link to the PR description |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b308c4/14956/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+xpog nanoGen runs, and no changes in ttbar nano events (expected only on susy samples when the particle is scanned) |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Mass precision in NanoGen was low -> increased to RECO precision, and allow for full precision
PR validation:
Ran NanoGen, checked Z mass distribution, precision looks sufficient for analysis now:
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
Will need backport to 10_6.
@kdlong
Update:
Increase mass precision for SUSY particles, as requested by @mariadalfonso, following HN post here: https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/physTools/3773.html
Change could not be tested locally, hope there is some ttbar NanoAod ouput file that we can check afterwards?