Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[HGCAL] MultiCluster to CaloParticle associator #33384

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Apr 18, 2021

Conversation

lecriste
Copy link
Contributor

@lecriste lecriste commented Apr 9, 2021

PR description:

This PR introduces an associator that can be consumed by several analyzers, avoiding code duplication. This PR supersedes PR#32941, no changes are expected in the output.

PR validation:

runTheMatrix -l limited

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 9, 2021

-code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33384/21983

Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 9, 2021

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33384/21984

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 9, 2021

A new Pull Request was created by @lecriste (Leonardo Cristella) for master.

It involves the following packages:

DataFormats/ParticleFlowReco
SimCalorimetry/HGCalAssociatorProducers
SimDataFormats/Associations

@perrotta, @civanch, @kpedro88, @cmsbuild, @srimanob, @mdhildreth, @slava77, @jpata can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@hatakeyamak, @rovere, @lgray, @apsallid, @cbernet, @fabiocos this is something you requested to watch as well.
@silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Apr 9, 2021

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33384/22112

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #33384 was updated. @perrotta, @civanch, @kpedro88, @cmsbuild, @srimanob, @mdhildreth, @slava77, @jpata can you please check and sign again.

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

Please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-61da68/14247/summary.html
COMMIT: 9572be0
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_3_X_2021-04-14-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc900
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/33384/14247/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 38
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2864426
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2864403
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 37 files compared)
  • Checked 160 log files, 37 edm output root files, 38 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Apr 16, 2021

+reconstruction

for #33384 9572be0

  • the reconstruction category part is almost trivial addition of a typedef in DataFormats/ParticleFlowReco/interface/HGCalMultiCluster.h

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Apr 16, 2021

+1

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

+Upgrade

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@qliphy
Copy link
Contributor

qliphy commented Apr 18, 2021

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants